Abstract

Transnational companies (TNCs) in general and those operating in the extractive industry sector in particular have an impact on the realisation of human rights. Yet under international human rights law, instruments regulating TNCs’ obligations in terms of human rights are non-binding. Consequently, the state in which TNCs operate remains the only duty bearer of human rights and should ensure that companies under its jurisdiction comply with human rights. The aim of this article is to examine the extent to which Nigeria and South Africa comply with their obligations to ensure that TNCs in extractive industries operating within their borders promote and respect human rights. Ultimately it is argued that the legal architecture in the countries under study does not satisfactorily shield people from the actions of TNCs. In an attempt to remedy the situation, it is suggested that a way forward could be constructed on the following pillars: inserting human rights clauses into international trade and investment agreements; raising awareness of and sensitization on the importance of corporate social responsibility as a profit maximising mechanism; turning corporate social responsibility into binding human rights obligations; and using international human rights monitoring mechanisms. Though the points made in this article generally engage the human rights impacts of extractive industries in Nigeria and South African, the proposed solutions are generalisable to other societies in which these industries operate.

Highlights

  • Human rights law protects the population against abuses of the state

  • Guided by traditional state obligations echoed by the Maastricht Guidelines mentioned earlier, the aim of this article is to explore the extent to which Nigeria and South Africa comply with their obligations to ensure that transnational companies (TNCs) in extractive industries operating within their borders promote and respect human rights

  • Nigeria could learn from South Africa by moving socio-economic rights from the mere Directive Principles of State Policies to the binding part of the Constitution to make sure that the country companies law is tailored towards compelling corporations to respect human rights

Read more

Summary

Introduction

International law".6 In other words, non-state actors are the subjects of international law. Non-state actors are the subjects of international law In this regard, as a result of their influence, TNCs have direct human rights obligations. Guided by traditional state obligations echoed by the Maastricht Guidelines mentioned earlier, the aim of this article is to explore the extent to which Nigeria and South Africa comply with their obligations to ensure that TNCs in extractive industries operating within their borders promote and respect human rights. The first part presents the structure of the extractive industries and the second part focuses on human rights violations by these industries in the countries under investigation

The structure of extractive industries
Turning CSR into binding human rights obligations
Using international human rights monitoring mechanisms
Conclusion
Findings
Literature
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.