Reduction in False-Positive PF4/Heparin Antibody Testing Following Implementation of a Latex Immunoturbidimetric Assay

Abstract

Abstract Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening complication of exposure to heparin that is caused by autoantibodies against heparin-PF4 complexes. We recently changed our in-house HIT screening platform from a manual, daily batched ELISA (Stago-Asserochrom HPIA Immunoassay) to an automated, on-demand latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA, HemosIL HIT-Ab) and have also implemented a reflex from a positive LIA result to the confirmatory serotonin release assay (SRA). We compared the two methods in terms of utilization, test performance, and turnaround time. Methods Data were collected retrospectively from a 7-month period before (June-December 2017) and after (June-December 2018) implementation of the HemosIL LIA in the clinical laboratory at a large academic institution. This study includes consecutive test results from adults (median age: 64 years, range: 19-98 years) seen at our 1,300-bed main hospital. Test utilization, turnaround time (sample receipt to verification), and test performance characteristics were compared between the two methods. Repeat testing was excluded from the analysis. Samples with a positive result on the HemosIL LIA were reflexed to a serotonin release assay (SRA), performed at a large reference laboratory, whereas samples tested with the earlier ELISA assay were referred for SRA testing based upon clinical judgment. When performed, SRA was considered the gold standard for diagnosis of HIT. Results During the 7 months before and after switching methods, there were 109 of 594 (18.4%) positive ELISA results and 45 of 523 (8.6%) positive LIA results. Only 90 of 109 (82%) of the positive results from the ELISA HIT Ab test were sent out by clinicians for SRA testing, whereas 45 of 45 (100%) of the positive results from LIA testing were reflexed to SRA per protocol. Although fewer LIA tests were sent out for SRA testing, there were an equal number of SRA-confirmed cases of HIT with the ELISA (PPV: 16/90 [17.8%]) and LIA methods (PPV: 16/45 [35.6%]), resulting in a high positive predictive value (PPV) with the newly implemented method. Not only was the PPV higher with the LIA test, but it had a significantly shorter mean turnaround time of 96 minutes compared to the ELISA TAT of 1,234 minutes (P < .0001). Conclusions With the new testing protocol, patients received results faster (average 96-minute TAT) and had fewer false-positive results (74/594 pre vs 29/523 post), with no apparent reduction in detection of true-positive cases of HIT (16/594 pre vs 16/523 post).