Abstract

This article investigates the dichotomy between higher statistical power and higher allocation to better treatment in an ethical-optimal response-adaptive design. Although many response-adaptive designs in the literature promise higher allocation to the superior treatment, this is not always guaranteed due to the variability of the designs. A new criterion for evaluating response-adaptive designs, motivated by the value-at-risk measure, is proposed to address this problem. We also provide an illustration of applying this criterion in a real clinical trial.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.