Abstract
Background: This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of recurrence patterns in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in comparison to those undergoing up-front surgery (US) for PDAC. Methods: The EMBASE, SCOPUS, PubMed and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched to identify eligible comparative studies. The primary outcome was time to first recurrence and location of recurrence. Results: Twenty-five articles were identified including 4822 patients undergoing resection. The weighted mean follow-up interval for recurrence outcomes was 40.8months (CI 33.4-48.1). The weighted mean overall recurrence rate was 63.4% (CI 51.8-73.%) for NAT, significantly lower than the 74% (CI 68.7-80%) weighted overall recurrence rate of the US cohort (OR 0.67 (CI 0.52-0.87), P=0.006). NAT was also associated with a significantly longer weighted mean time to first recurrence (NAT 18.8months US 15.7months, P=0.015). The weighted locoregional recurrence (NAT 12%, US 27%, P=0.004) and liver recurrence (NAT 19.4%, US 30.1% P=0.023) rates were markedly improved among NAT patients. Weighted lung and peritoneal recurrence rates did not differ (P=0.705 and P=0.549 respectively). NAT was further associated with a greater two- (NAT 39%, US 22% OR 1.84 (CI 1.22-2.78), P=0.007) and five-year (NAT 24%, US 13% OR 1.95 (CI 1.03-3.69), P=0.043) recurrence free survival. Borderline resectability, presence of perineural invasion and a lower N0 nodal status were positive predictors of overall recurrence in the NAT cohort. Conclusions: NAT is associated with improved overall recurrence rates and longer time to first recurrence, an observation likely attributed to the improved rates of locoregional and liver recurrence.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.