Abstract

BackgroundTraditionally, dental models, facial and intra-oral photographs and a set of two-dimensional radiographs are used for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. As evidence is lacking, the discussion is ongoing which specific records are needed for the process of making an orthodontic treatment plan.ObjectiveTo estimate the contribution and importance of different diagnostic records for making an orthodontic diagnosis and treatment plan.Data sourcesAn electronic search in PubMed (1948–July 2012), EMBASE Excerpta Medica (1980–July 2012), CINAHL (1982–July 2012), Web of Science (1945–July 2012), Scopus (1996–July 2012), and Cochrane Library (1993–July 2012) was performed. Additionally, a hand search of the reference lists of included studies was performed to identify potentially eligible studies. There was no language restriction.Study selectionThe patient, intervention, comparator, outcome (PICO) question formulated for this study was as follows: for patients who need orthodontic treatment (P), will the use of record set X (I) compared with record set Y (C) change the treatment plan (O)? Only primary publications were included.Data extractionIndependent extraction of data and quality assessment was performed by two observers.ResultsOf the 1041 publications retrieved, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 4 studies were of high quality. Because of the limited number of high quality studies and the differences in study designs, patient characteristics, and reference standard or index test, a meta-analysis was not possible.ConclusionCephalograms are not routinely needed for orthodontic treatment planning in Class II malocclusions, digital models can be used to replace plaster casts, and cone-beam computed tomography radiographs can be indicated for impacted canines. Based on the findings of this review, the minimum record set required for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning could not be defined.Systematic review registration number CRD42012002365

Highlights

  • Orthodontic records are required for an orthodontic diagnosis and treatment plan [1,2]

  • With the development of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) and lower-dose cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), new and valuable tools became available for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning in selected cases [4]

  • We found that many studies deal with the accuracy of diagnostic records; for example, the accuracy of dental plaster casts compared with dental digital casts, but do not analyze the contribution of that specific record to treatment planning [27]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Orthodontic records are required for an orthodontic diagnosis and treatment plan [1,2]. Dental casts, intra- and extra-oral photographs, different radiographic images, and clinical measurements are utilized for this purpose. Recent technological advancements such as digitized dental models, the use of digital dental set-ups to mimic the outcome of orthodontic treatment, and three-dimensional (3D) imaging of the face have led to alternative options for patient documentation. A conventional two-dimensional (2D) set of records is still common, these new developments may lead to a more individualized selection of records to optimize orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Dental models, facial and intra-oral photographs and a set of two-dimensional radiographs are used for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. The discussion is ongoing which specific records are needed for the process of making an orthodontic treatment plan

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Full Text

Published Version
Open DOI Link

Get access to 115M+ research papers

Discover from 40M+ Open access, 2M+ Pre-prints, 9.5M Topics and 32K+ Journals.

Sign Up Now! It's FREE

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call