Abstract

We have reconstituted a eukaryotic leading/lagging strand replisome comprising 31 distinct polypeptides. This study identifies a process unprecedented in bacterial replisomes. While bacteria and phage simply recruit polymerases to the fork, we find that suppression mechanisms are used to position the distinct eukaryotic polymerases on their respective strands. Hence, Pol ε is active with CMG on the leading strand, but it is unable to function on the lagging strand, even when Pol δ is not present. Conversely, Pol δ-PCNA is the only enzyme capable of extending Okazaki fragments in the presence of Pols ε and α. We have shown earlier that Pol δ-PCNA is suppressed on the leading strand with CMG (Georgescu et al., 2014). We propose that CMG, the 11-subunit helicase, is responsible for one or both of these suppression mechanisms that spatially control polymerase occupancy at the fork.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04988.001

Highlights

  • Composition of the eukaryotic replisome and the function of its various proteins is an area of active investigation

  • We demonstrate here that Pol δ is active on the lagging strand in the presence of Pol ε and Pol α

  • The discontinuous lagging strand is a more difficult process than continuous leading strand synthesis, and the current study aims to identify how polymerases are coordinated during coupled leading–lagging strand synthesis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Composition of the eukaryotic replisome and the function of its various proteins is an area of active investigation. Cellular studies reveal that eukaryotes use two different DNA polymerases for the leading and lagging strands, Pols ε and δ, respectively (Lee et al, 1989; Weinberg and Kelly, 1989; Tsurimoto et al, 1990; Waga and Stillman, 1998; Benkovic et al, 2001; Pursell et al, 2007; Kunkel and Burgers, 2008; Nick McElhinny et al, 2008; Stillman, 2008). Numerous other proteins travel with eukaryotic replication forks and have no bacterial homolog or known function. Many replication fork-associated proteins undergo modifications in response to the cell cycle or DNA damage

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.