Abstract

We present a new theoretical picture of magnetically dominated, decaying turbulence in the absence of a mean magnetic field. We demonstrate that such turbulence is governed by the reconnection of magnetic structures, and not by ideal dynamics, as has previously been assumed. We obtain predictions for the magnetic-energy decay laws by proposing that turbulence decays on reconnection timescales, while respecting the conservation of certain integral invariants representing topological constraints satisfied by the reconnecting magnetic field. As is well known, the magnetic helicity is such an invariant for initially helical field configurations, but does not constrain non-helical decay, where the volume-averaged magnetic-helicity density vanishes. For such a decay, we propose a new integral invariant, analogous to the Loitsyansky and Saffman invariants of hydrodynamic turbulence, that expresses the conservation of the random (scaling as $\mathrm{volume}^{1/2}$) magnetic helicity contained in any sufficiently large volume. Our treatment leads to novel predictions for the magnetic-energy decay laws: in particular, while we expect the canonical $t^{-2/3}$ power law for helical turbulence when reconnection is fast (i.e., plasmoid-dominated or stochastic), we find a shallower $t^{-4/7}$ decay in the slow `Sweet-Parker' reconnection regime, in better agreement with existing numerical simulations. For non-helical fields, for which there currently exists no definitive theory, we predict power laws of $t^{-10/9}$ and $t^{-20/17}$ in the fast- and slow-reconnection regimes, respectively. We formulate a general principle of decay of turbulent systems subject to conservation of Saffman-like invariants, and propose how it may be applied to MHD turbulence with a strong mean magnetic field and to isotropic MHD turbulence with initial equipartition between the magnetic and kinetic energies.

Highlights

  • The nature of the decay of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence is an important outstanding problem in fluid dynamics, with far-reaching consequences in astrophysics, from the evolution of primordial magnetic fields in cosmology [1,2,3] to the dynamics of the solar wind [4]

  • Equation (8) states that the rate of change of magnetic helicity is smaller than the rate of the energy decay due to Ohmic heating by a factor equal to the ratio of the integral scale to the resistive dissipation length scale, which becomes arbitrarily small as ηn → 0þ

  • III, we proposed a way to impose the constraint of magnetic-helicity conservation on the decay of nonhelical MHD turbulence via the conservation of IH

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The nature of the decay of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence is an important outstanding problem in fluid dynamics, with far-reaching consequences in astrophysics, from the evolution of primordial magnetic fields in cosmology [1,2,3] to the dynamics of the solar wind [4]. III, we consider the decay of nonhelical MHD turbulence from a magnetically dominated state The mechanism controlling this type of decay has so far remained unknown: Because the mean helicity density vanishes, its conservation cannot be used to derive a scaling relation relating B, the characteristic magnetic field, to its characteristic length scale L. A Kolmogorov-style argument leads to a t−1 power law independently of whether the decay occurs on the ideal [21,24,33,41] or the Sweet-Parker [35,43,50] timescale (see the Appendix A) That both treatments predict the same power law is a coincidence related to the fact that anastrophy conservation implies a constant Lundquist number for n 1⁄4 2 resistive dissipation [50] (incidentally, the scaling argument is essentially this same point with the direction of implication reversed). We conjecture that the simultaneous conservation of both the Saffman-type cross-helicity invariant and the magnetic helicity might govern the initial period of decay of an MHD state starting with U ∼ B

DECAY OF HELICAL TURBULENCE
Theory of helical decay
Numerical results
DECAY OF NONHELICAL TURBULENCE
Qualitative theory of nonhelical decay
The Saffman helicity invariant
Permanence and impermanence of the large scales
E M ðk IBk2 4π2 þ
H k2 2π2 þ
Decay laws
Behavior of other invariants
DISCUSSION
General decay principles
When the Saffman helicity invariant fails
Decay of MHD turbulence in the presence of strong mean field
Helical magnetic field
Nonhelical magnetic field
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.