Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the court practice of 2013 – first half of 2018 in cases on recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and its influence on the reformation of the procedural legislation of Ukraine in this field.The cases on recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards have a significant meaning both for the international image and economy of the state. Despite the courts follow a pro-arbitration approach; the court practice in Ukraine for the last 5 years has formed a number of requirements that complicated the procedure of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards that became a reason for renewing of it.Thus, 15.12.2017 in Ukraine the new procedure came into force that solved some collisions, in particular: 1) the enforcement order shall be issued on the ground of the claim on recognition and enforcement of arbitral award; 2) the amount of recovery under the arbitral award shall be determined including interests and penalty up to the moment of execution; 3) the recovery in the foreign currency shall be converted into the UAH, if claimant is asking for that.Although, a relatively short period of conducting proceedings in cases on recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards under the renew procedure does not allow to estimate its efficiency, the elimination of gaps in law enforcement practice promising the procedure to be prospective.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
