Abstract

Research Article| April 15, 2015 Reassessment of the Maximum Fault Rupture Length of Strike‐Slip Earthquakes and Inference on Mmax in the Anatolian Peninsula, Turkey Arnaud Mignan; Arnaud Mignan aInstitute of Geophysics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, CH‐8092 Zürich, Switzerlandarnaud.mignan@sed.ethz.ch Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Laurentiu Danciu; Laurentiu Danciu bSwiss Seismological Service, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, CH‐8092 Zürich, Switzerland Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Domenico Giardini Domenico Giardini aInstitute of Geophysics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, CH‐8092 Zürich, Switzerlandarnaud.mignan@sed.ethz.ch Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Arnaud Mignan aInstitute of Geophysics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, CH‐8092 Zürich, Switzerlandarnaud.mignan@sed.ethz.ch Laurentiu Danciu bSwiss Seismological Service, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, CH‐8092 Zürich, Switzerland Domenico Giardini aInstitute of Geophysics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, CH‐8092 Zürich, Switzerlandarnaud.mignan@sed.ethz.ch Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Online ISSN: 1938-2057 Print ISSN: 0895-0695 © 2015 by the Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2015) 86 (3): 890–900. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140252 Article history First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Arnaud Mignan, Laurentiu Danciu, Domenico Giardini; Reassessment of the Maximum Fault Rupture Length of Strike‐Slip Earthquakes and Inference on Mmax in the Anatolian Peninsula, Turkey. Seismological Research Letters 2015;; 86 (3): 890–900. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140252 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search Seismic‐hazard analyses and stress tests for critical infrastructures show limitations in the treatment of extreme events. These extreme events can be great earthquakes and/or their cascading effects, generally not foreseen in risk analysis and management (e.g., Komendantova et al., 2014). For instance, earthquake ruptures are known to potentially propagate over several segments (e.g., Eberhart‐Phillips et al., 2003; Fliss et al., 2005), yet fault segments are still modeled as individual faults in most regional seismic‐hazard models based on expert opinion and on limited paleoseismic data. Rate anomalies (known as the bulge) in the Uniform California... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.