Abstract

High level ab initio and CASSCF calculations on the epoxidation of ethylene with dioxirane (DO) and dimethydioxirane (DMDO) have been carried out to distinguish between a symmetrical versus an unsymmetrical spiro orientation of the dioxirane in the transition structure for oxygen atom transfer. The optimized C1 DO/ethylene unsymmetrical spiro CASSCF(12,12)/6-31G(d) transition structure is a first-order saddle point that is 5.5 kcal/mol lower in energy than the corresponding constrained Cs symmetrical approach (a second-order saddle point) after correction for dynamic correlation [CASSCF(MP2)]. However, a single-point energy correction at the BD(T)/6-311+G(d,p) level on these CASSCF geometries suggests that the C1 TS is only 0.6 kcal/mol lower in energy than an symmetrical spiro TS. Both the BD(T) correction to the CAS(8,8)/6-31+G(d,p) and RSPT2 energy correction on CAS(8,8)/6-31G(d) DO/ethylene structures slightly favors the Cs structures. BD(T)/6-311+G(d,p) single point calculations on the C1 and Cs transition structures optimized at the CCSD(T)/6-31G(d) level slightly favor the unsymmetrical TS. These combined data suggest that the potential energy surface for the approach of dioxirane to the CC of ethylene is very soft with the C1 transition structure being slightly favored. For DMDO epoxidation, we conclude that the approach of DMDO to a symmetrically substituted alkene should result in an essentially symmetrical transition structure.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.