Real-world efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in microsatellite unstable/mismatch repair-deficient biliary tract cancer: An AGEO study.

Historically, tumor burden has been considered an impediment to efficacy of immunotherapeutic agents, including vaccines, stem cell transplant, cytokine therapy, and intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin. This effect has been attributed to hypoxic zones in the tumor core contributing to poor T-cell infiltration, formation of immunosuppressive stromal cells, and development of therapy-resistant cell populations. However, the association between tumor burden and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is unknown. We sought to determine the association between radiographic tumor burden parameters and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced lung cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Demographic, disease, and treatment data were collected. Serial tumor dimensions were recorded according to RECIST version 1.1. Associations between radiographic tumor burden (baseline sum of longest diameters, longest single diameter) and clinical outcomes (radiographic response, progression-free survival, and overall survival) were determined using log-rank tests, Cox proportional-hazard regression, and logistic regression. Among 105 patients, the median baseline sum of longest diameters (BSLD) was 6.4 cm; median longest single diameter was 3.6 cm. BSLD was not associated with best radiographic, progression-free survival, or overall survival. In univariate and multivariate analyses, no significant associations were observed for the other radiographic parameters and outcomes when considered as categorical or continuous variables. Although tumor burden has been considered a mediator of efficacy of earlier immunotherapies, in advanced lung cancer it does not appear to affect outcomes from immune checkpoint inhibitors. Historically, tumor burden has been considered an impediment to the efficacy of various immunotherapies, including vaccines, cytokines, allogeneic stem cell transplant, and intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin. However, in the present study, no association was found between tumor burden and efficacy (response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival) of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced lung cancer. These findings suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors may provide benefit across a range of disease burden, including bulky tumors considered resistant to other categories of immunotherapy.

Background: Biliary tract cancer, typically diagnosed at advanced stages with a poor prognosis, has witnessed a glimmer of hope in the progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Yet, their limited response rates necessitate the search for effective biomarkers to refine patient selection. Methods: A total of 125 patients with a confirmed histological diagnosis of unresectable advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTC) who received first-line ICIs in combination with chemotherapy (chemoimmunotherapy) were prospectively enrolled. All baseline samples from 125 patients underwent targeted DNA sequencing, with an additional 62 patients undergoing RNA sequencing, and 85 patients had accessible mIHC data. The associations between molecular characteristics and the response to chemoimmunotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: The cohort had a median age of 63 years (range from 34 to 82) and 52.8% (66/125) were male, including 54 with gallbladder cancer, 57 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 14 with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The median duration of follow-up was 14.8 months for the entire cohort, with the median PFS and OS of 6.9 months (95%CI: 6.2-7.9) and 11.8 months (95%CI: 10.3-14.8), respectively. The most mutated genes were TP53 (64/125, 51.2%), KRAS (34/125, 27.2%), ERBB2 (18/125, 14.4%), and ARID1A (17/125, 13.6%). Mutations of TP53 (51.2%, p = 0.042), BRCA2 (4.8%, p = 0.002), cytokine genes (6.4%, p = 0.004), and high tumor mutation burden (p = 0.072) demonstrated significant correlation with chemoimmunotherapy response. KRAS G12D mutations (PFS: P < 0.001; OS: P = 0.034) and ARID1A loss-of-function mutations (PFS: P = 0.009; OS: P = 0.012) were adverse survival factors, while high CXCL9 or CTLA4 expression was associated with response (CXCL9, P = 0.014; CTLA4, P = 0.067), improved PFS (CXCL9, P = 0.018; CTLA4, P = 0.008), and longer OS (CXCL9, P = 0.010; CTLA4, P = 0.008) under chemoimmunotherapy. Patients were classified into three subtypes using the identified survival biomarkers. Among them, Type I patients, characterized by the absence of KRAS G12D or ARID1A mutations but expressing high levels of CTLA4 or CXCL9, demonstrated the best outcomes under chemoimmunotherapy. Interestingly, further RNA analysis suggested that elevated CXCL9 expression correlated with heightened immune checkpoint expressions, including CTLA4, PD-L1, and PD-1 (all P < 0.001), as well as increased tumor microenvironment immune activity, findings validated in two additional independent patient cohorts both internal and external. Conclusions: Our study revealed predictive biomarkers relevant to the response and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer. Citation Format: Jieer Ying, Qi Xu, Jiaojiao Ni, Hanlin Chen, Chaoqun Li, Yanru Xie, Qinhong Zheng, Jianying Jin, Junrong Yan, Xiaoying Wu, Qiuxiang Ou, Li Yuan, Wei Zhuo, Haimeng Tang. Multi-omics analysis uncovers predictive biomarkers for the efficacy and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy in advanced unresectable biliary tract cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5132.

Real-world efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in microsatellite unstable/mismatch repair-deficient biliary tract cancer: An AGEO study.

Limited data exist on safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) among organ transplant recipients. The objective of this study was to report a case series of two patients with renal transplant who received treatment with an ICI and to conduct a pooled analysis of published cases to describe the safety and efficacy of ICIs in organ transplant patients. A systematic search in the Google Scholar and PubMed databases was carried out to include all the published cases of organ transplant patients who received treatment with ICIs including programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1, or cytotoxic lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitors since their inscription to January 31, 2019. In the present series of two cases with renal allografts who received pembrolizumab, one patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the skin experienced complete response (CR), whereas another patient with melanoma had a mixed response. Both patients experienced allograft rejection, but graft was salvaged. The pooled analysis of 64 patients published in literature showed that overall allograft rejection rate is 41% in organ transplant recipients following ICI therapy. The graft rejection rate was 44% (17/39) for renal, 39% (7/19) for liver, and 20% (1/5) for cardiac allografts. The highest risk was seen among patients who were treated with PD-1 inhibitors, 20/42 (48%)-13/24 (54%) on nivolumab and 7/18 (39%) on pembrolizumab. The risk was lowest with ipilimumab, 23% (3/13). The overall response rate (CR + partial response [PR]) was 20% with ipilimumab, 26% with nivolumab, and 53% with pembrolizumab, whereas disease control rate (CR + PR + stable disease) was 35% with ipilimumab, 37% with nivolumab, and 53% with pembrolizumab. None of the variables including age, gender, type of cancer, type of allograft, type of immunosuppression, time since transplantation to initiation of ICI, and prior history of rejection were significantly associated with the transplant rejection on univariate analysis. The efficacy of ICI among patients with organ transplant appears promising, warranting testing in prospective clinical trials. The risk of rejection and allograft loss is considerable; therefore, the risk and alternative form of therapies should be thoroughly discussed with the transplant patients prior to initiating ICI therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Transplant recipients are at higher risk of developing cancers. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to improve the outcome in more than one cancer type, transplant recipients were excluded from these trials. Most of the data on the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in transplant patients are based upon case series and case reports. The pooled data from these reports suggest that anti-programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors have reasonable safety and efficacy among organ transplant patients, which warrants testing in clinical trials.

BackgroundWhile the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is increasingly recognized in advanced gastric cancer (aGC), overall survival (OS) has not been consistently improved across the different randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the efficacy and safety of ICI and explore potential predictive tumor tissue biomarkers in aGC.MethodsA random-effect pairwise meta-analysis was used to evaluate the primary outcome of OS. Sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate the effects of ICIs on PD-L1 status, TMB, MSI-H, and the Asian patient population. We extracted the OS Kaplan–Meier curves from the included trials to compare the effect of PD-L1 status on response to ICIs using DigitizeIt 2.5 and Guyot’s algorithm.ResultsA pairwise meta-analysis of seven RCTs included in this study showed that ICIs were more effective than the comparator in improving OS (pooled HR: 0.84). We demonstrated that PD-1 ICIs were additive when combined with the comparator arm (pooled HR: 0.79). A sensitivity analysis showed that PD-1 ICIs were associated with better OS outcomes in the Asian patient population as monotherapy (pooled HR: 0.66) or in combination with chemotherapy (pooled HR: 0.83). We demonstrated that tumors with PD-L1 ≥1 (P = 0.02) and PD-L1 ≥10 (P = 0.006) derived OS benefit from ICI monotherapy. Equally, MSI-H (P <0.00001) and TMB-high (P <0.0001) tumors derived favorable survival benefits from ICIs.Conclusions and relevanceThe results of this meta-analysis suggest that ICIs result in improved OS outcomes in aGC. The benefits varied with different ethnicities, class of ICI, PD-L1 expression, MSI status, and TMBSystematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier (CRD42019137829).

See Reply

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are one of the most significant oncological treatment modalities as a result of the rapid advancement of immunotherapy. Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) have emerged as key markers for predicting the efficacy and prognosis of ICIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the predictive role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has also received significant attention. However, the prognosis of some individuals cannot be determined by these indicators; for instance, some patients with low PD-L1 expression also benefit from longer survival. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to investigate the connection between new haematological and pathological markers and clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs. Seventy-six patients with stage III-IV NSCLC treated with ICIs were included in this study. We used the Mann-Whitney test, COX regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis to retrospectively analyze peripheral blood indicators and survival prognostic data of 76 patients in order to investigate the relationship between baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the efficacy of ICIs. To investigate the correlation between CXCL13, CXCR5, CD8 and the efficacy of ICIs, we assessed the expression levels of aforementioned indicators in biopsied tissues of 10 non-small cell lung tumors by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) and performed statistical analysis. Disease control rate (DCR) was higher in patients with baseline NLR <3.4 (p=0.016) and neutrophil percentage <71% (P=0.015). Baseline NLR (HR=2.364, P=0.003) and neutrophil percentage (HR=2.824, P=0.013) had the greatest influence on patients' survival prognosis, with baseline NLR exhibiting a stronger predictive value (AUC=0.717), according to univariate and multifactorial COX regression analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In NSCLC tissues, higher expression of CXCL13 was associated with better clinical outcomes (P=0.032) and higher expression of CD8 was associated with prolonged survival (P=0.022). Low baseline NLR in peripheral blood and high expression of CD8 in tissues are associated with longer PFS and may have a potential predictive value for patients with stage III-IV NSCLC using ICIs.

EP08.01-105 Efficacy of First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced NSCLC harboring KRAS, MET, FGFR, RET, BRAF, and HER2 Alterations

e16124 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) has shown promising efficacy in multiple cancers including biliary tract cancers (BTCs). However, the data focusing on the efficacy of ICIs in patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) is still limited. This study aims to assess the efficacy of ICIs in GBC and explore the clinicopathological and molecular markers of ICI benefit. Methods: This was a single center, retrospective study, including 80 GBC patients who had received ICI (anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) therapy at Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (Shanghai, China) between January 2016 and December 2020. Tumor samples from 31 of these patients who had previously underwent surgical resection before ICI therapy were obtained and conducted for whole exome sequencing and immunohistochemical analysis. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The associations between efficacy with clinicopathological factors, genetic variations and PD-L1/CD8 expression were further explored. Results: Of 80 patients with GBC, 36 were male, the median age was 61 years (range, 30-79). The median PFS and OS was 4.5 months (95% CI, 2.99-5.95) and 8.7 months (95% CI, 7.07-10.26) respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that alcohol intake history (HR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.31-5.40; p=0.007), extrahepatic metastasis (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.15-3.59; p=0.015), carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) level ≥100U/mL (HR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.65-7.74; p=0.001) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10-0.57; p=0.001) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Extrahepatic metastasis (HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.37-4.31; p=0.003), CEA level ≥100U/mL (HR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.33-5.95; p=0.007) and irAEs (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.14-0.72; p=0.006) were independent prognostic factors for OS. ORR and DCR were 13.75% and 37.5%, respectively. Patients with irAEs (85.7%, OR, 16.00; 95% CI, 3.26-78.61; p&lt;0.001), high CD8+ T-cells-infiltrated GBCs (87.5%, OR, 19.83; 95% CI, 2.00-196.38; p=0.011), immune inflamed phenotype (66.7%, OR, 5.60; 95% CI, 1.16-27.08; p=0.032) had higher DCR, while patients with high level of total bilirubin (TBIL&gt;34.2μmol/L) (8.3%, OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01-0.97; p=0.048) had lower DCR. Patients with high CD8+ T-cells-infiltrated or immune inflamed GBCs also had a notably improved PFS and OS. Conclusions: ICIs were effective in patients with GBC. Alcohol intake history, extrahepatic metastasis, CEA level ≥100U/mL, irAEs, high positivity of CD8+ T-cells and immune inflamed phenotype may be useful for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in GBC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising efficacy in multiple cancers including biliary tract cancers (BTCs). However, the data focusing on the efficacy of ICIs in patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) is still limited. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy of ICIs in GBC and explore the clinicopathologic and molecular markers associated with ICI benefit. We retrospective analyzed 69 GBC patients who had received ICI therapy between January 2016 and December 2020. Tumor samples were obtained for genomic sequencing and immunohistochemical analysis. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 4.4 months and 8.5 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that alcohol intake history, carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) level ≥100 U/mL, and cutaneous immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. CEA level ≥100 U/mL and cutaneous irAEs were independent prognostic factors for OS. The objective response rate and disease control rate (DCR) were 15.9% and 37.7%, respectively. Patients with cutaneous irAEs, high CD8+ T cell infiltrated or immune inflamed GBCs had higher DCR. Patients with high CD8+ T cell infiltrated or immune inflamed GBCs also had a notably improved prognosis. These results suggest that ICIs were effective in patients with GBC. High CEA level, cutaneous irAEs, high CD8+ T cell infiltration, and immune inflamed phenotype could be useful for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in GBC.

Background: It has been established that women usually mount a stronger immune response than men of the same age. Data for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) based on the patient’s’ sex are scarce. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the impact of the patients’ sex on the efficacy and toxicity of ICIs. Materials and Methods: Aretrospective audit of a prospectively collected database of patients receiving ICIs for advanced solid tumors between August 2015 and November 2018 was performed at the Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai, India. The categorical and continuous variables were evaluated using descriptive statistics. The Kaplan–Meier estimator was used to analyze the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Atotal of 155 patients were included in the study, of which 36 (23.2%) were female and 119 (76.8%) were male. The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4–4.2) for the male patients and 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.0–2.8) for the female patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.69–1.66; P = 0.764). The median OS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1.5–10.2) for the male patients and 4.2 months (95% CI, 1.1–7.3) for the female patients (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.77–2.12; P = 0.342). The rates of all toxicities, except for pneumonitis, were similar between the male and female patients. All-grade pneumonitis occurred in a total of 7 (5.8%) male patients, while it was not reported in any female patients. All-grade immune-related adverse effects occurred in 24 (20.2%) male and 4 (18.1%) female patients (P = 0.216). Conclusions: This study shows that the efficacy and toxicity of ICIs are similar in the male and female patients. However, future trials with a balanced number of male and female patients are required to ensure an unbiased estimation of the efficacy and safety of ICIs.

The influence of antacids use on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) on ICI efficacy in advanced solid cancer patients. A systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed to retrieve studies investigating the effect of antacid use on ICI efficacy. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and immune-related adverse events were measured using hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs). Thirty studies enrolling 16,147 advanced cancer patients receiving ICI treatment were included. The pooled analysis indicated that PPI use was associated with shorter OS (HR=1.40, 95% CI, 1.25-1.57) and PFS (HR=1.34, 95% CI, 1.19-1.52) in advanced cancer patients treated with ICIs. PPI use did not show effect on ORR or immune-related adverse event of advanced cancer patients receiving ICI treatment. OS, PFS, and ORR did not differ between H2RA users and non-H2RA users. In subgroup analyses, PPI use was associated with shorter OS and PFS in NSCLC and urothelial carcinoma patients and in patients treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 or anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 monotherapy. In addition, ICI efficacy was different in the antacid exposure time frame subgroups. In conclusion, PPI use has a negative effect on OS and PFS among advanced cancer patients receiving ICI treatment. PPIs should be cautiously administered among advanced cancer patients treated with ICI. The safety of H2RAs and the influence of H2RAs on ICI efficacy need further investigation.

e14629 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved the survival of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC), however, the benefit of ICIs was limited to a few patients. It is vital to comprehend the factors influencing the response in order to identify patients who might benefit from ICIs. Cachexia, an intricate multifaceted syndrome characterized by the loss of skeletal muscle and substantial weight reduction, might impact on the immune response and efficacy of ICIs in cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of longitudinal dynamics of cachexia on the efficacy and adverse effect of ICIs for advanced ESCC patients. Methods: Advanced ESCC patients received at least two cycles of ICIs were enrolled from 2017 to 2021. The baseline and longitudinal changes of cachexia during ICI treatment were collected. Based on the longitudinal weight changes during ICI treatment, patients exhibiting cachexia at baseline were categorized into "reversible cachexia" and "irreversible cachexia" group, and patients without cachexia at baseline were also divided into "latent cachexia" and "cachexia-free" group. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were performed to explore the impact of cachexia on the efficacy ICIs for ESCC patients. And chi-square test was used to evaluate the correlation between cachexia and immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). Results: A total of 278 individuals who had either received or were presently undergoing ICI treatment were enrolled, with the median progression free survival (PFS) of 5.8 months and overall survival (OS) of 8.3 months. Patients with cachexia before treatment had notably poorer outcomes, with median PFS of 7.9 vs 5.3 months (P=0.001), median time to progression (TTP) of 10.9 vs 6.1 months (P&lt;0.001), and median OS of 14.3 vs 9.2 months (P=0.001). In terms of the longitudinal dynamics of cachexia, significantly inferior outcomes were observed for patients in irreversible cachexia compared to reversible cachexia, with the PFS of 4.4 months and 9 months (P&lt;0.001), the TTP of 4.9 months and 9 months (P=0.006), and the OS of 7.8 months and 15 months, respectively (P=0.003). Although patients in latent cachexia group had inferior survival compared to cachexia-free group, no statistical difference was observed, with the PFS of 10.0 and 7.9 months and OS of 13.9 and 16.2 months. Besides, neither baseline nor longitudinal changes of cachexia was associated with irAEs for ESCC patients. Conclusions: This study indicated the impact of baseline and longitudinal cachexia on the efficacy of ICIs for advanced ESCC patients with ICIs. Dynamic monitoring and management of cachexia was recommended during the ICI treatment of ESCC patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are highly effective in treating various cancers. We analyzed the significance of the KRAS/STK11 co-mutation in relation to the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in pan-cancer patient cohort. We analyzed data from open-access research: MSK-IMPACT (molecular profiling data from patients receiving systemic antitumor therapy) and MSK-TMB (molecular profiling data from patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors). In both studies, high throughput sequencing was used for molecular profiling. A total of 10,336 patients receiving antitumor therapy (MSK-IMPACT study) and 1661 patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (MSK-TMB study) were included in the analysis. Co-mutation STK11/KRAS was found in 156 (1.5%) and 46 (2.8%) patients in the two studies, respectively. Most patients with the STK11/KRAS co-mutation had non-small cell lung cancer (83% and 85% in the two studies, respectively). Among non-small cell lung cancer patients, the STK11 mutation was associated with a worse outcome for patients receiving systemic antitumor therapy, but not immune checkpoint inhibition therapy (HR for OS 1.90 [95% CI 1.36-2.65] and 1.44 [95% CI 0.88-2.37]). Co-mutation STK11/KRAS was also not associated with patient outcome in any of the studies (HR for OS 0.93 [95% CI 0.56-1.52] and 1.09 [95% CI 0.54-2.19]). High tumor mutational burden was associated with better outcome in the cohort of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. An analogous analysis among patients in the pan-cancer cohort (excluding patients with non-small cell lung cancer) showed STK11 mutations and high tumor mutational burden have a predictive role for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, but not STK11/KRAS co-mutation. Co-mutation STK11/KRAS is common among patients with non-small cell lung cancer and is not an independent predictive marker for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Further studies are required to clarify the role of STK11 mutations in immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment response.

e16175 Background: The safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in Child-Pugh (CP)-B and CP-C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients remain uncertain. In a multidisciplinary system a considerable number of patients will belong to this population and do not qualify for standard of care ICI-based regimens. This study presents a retrospective review of ICI in this specific population at our institution. Methods: This study included HCC patients who received at least one ICI dose between 1/1/2017 and 6/30/23 at Ohio State University. Clinical and pathological characteristics of interest were extracted through chart review. Survival outcomes assessed in this study include progression-free survival (PFS; date of first dose of ICI (Fd-ICI) to progression or death (D) or loss of follow-up (L-f/u)), overall survival (OS; date of diagnosis to D or L-f/u), and ICI-specific OS (OS-ICI; Fd-ICI to D or L-f/u). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate PFS, OS-ICI, and OS survival distributions. Median survival times were calculated and compared between groups using the Wilcoxon test. Results: We had 25 patients (19 CP-B and 6 CP-C) in the study cohort (SC) with a median age of 67 years (range: 48-84), 72% males and 88% Caucasians. Most of them (96%) had ascites, and 40% had hepatic encephalopathy at the time of ICI initiation. Seven patients had tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and 15 had local therapy (LT) before ICI. Most received single-agent ICI (n = 17), while 8 had it combined with bevacizumab (BEV). Median doses of ICI for the group were 3 (range, 1-25) and were better in CP-B (4, 1-25) than in CP C (1, 1-4) population. The group's median PFS, OS-ICI, and OS (in days) were 159, 222, and 439, respectively. The CP-B subgroup had better median PFS (242 vs. 41 days, p = 0.0002) and median OS-ICI (235 vs. 50 days, p = 0.0046) than CP-C. However, the median OS had no significant difference (497 vs. 290 days, p = 0.4). BEV combination improved the OS-ICI (242 vs. 127 days, p = 0.04) but not PFS or OS for the SC (CP-B + C). Additionally, ICI in the second line or more (583 vs. 244, p = 0.02) and specifically after LT (575 vs. 252 days, p = 0.02) improved the OS of this study cohort. Similar findings were noted in the CP-B subgroup (line - 575 vs. 252 days, p = 0.02 and LT - 678 vs. 293 days, p = 0.02). Only two patients experienced grade 3 immune-related adverse events (dermatitis and colitis); no complications were associated with BEV. Conclusions: ICIs can be safely and effectively used in CP-B patients with advanced HCC, particularly after LT and in second-line or later settings. CP-C patients derive limited benefit, highlighting the need for cautious selection. Combining BEV with ICIs is safe and may offer survival benefits in this challenging population.