Abstract

Based on data triangulation, open-ended questions can be used to overcome a typical problem with data collection using surveys: Human behavior can only be captured as stated or intended, but not as real behavior. In this study on knowledge sharing in the workplace, a quantitative measure of behavioral intention was accompanied by such a qualitative, open-ended measure of behavior. The latter was used as a proxy for real instead of stated behavior. This item was coded according to the effort a participant made in answering. It is assumed that the greater the effort put into answering the open-ended question, the more likely it is that the described behavior will be performed in reality. A factorial experimental design was used to analyze the effect of rewards on employees’ knowledge-sharing behavior. As a within-subject design was used, participants had to answer three open-ended questions referring to different vignettes. A strong order effect appeared, leading to longer answers on average for the first vignette (baseline) compared to subsequent vignettes, independent of treatment. Therefore, this approach to operationalizing behavior in surveys might not be useful in within-subject designs. However, it can be used in between-subject comparisons when participants are asked to answer to a single vignette.

Highlights

  • It is not possible to measure actual behavior in surveys and stated behavior is not always valid

  • Due to an order effect, open answers could not serve as a reliable estimator of the likelihood of actual behavior

  • An advantage of verbatim answers is that they can still be used to identify behavioral patterns and modes of Knowledge-sharing behavior (KSB). This strength of qualitative data should be taken into account more instead of merely quantifying qualitative data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is not possible to measure actual behavior in surveys and stated behavior is not always valid. Real-effort designs use real tasks in experiments to imitate realworld behavior and measure behavior more validly This study combines both approaches, surveys and real-effort designs, and uses open-ended questions to measure effort in answering behavior as a proxy for actual instead of stated behavior. I wanted to adapt experimental real-effort tasks to a survey design by using open-ended questions and analyzing the effort participants put into answering them. One solution could be to integrate open-ended questions as a measure of answering effort, and a proxy for real behavior, into quantitative surveys. This kind of method and data triangulation could help to overcome limitations of surveys related to the measurement of behavior

Objectives
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.