Abstract

This essay posits a framework of shared identity and practice for feminist bibliographers, book historians, and textual scholars. Feminist bibliographyis positioned as the use of bibliographic methodologies to revise how book history and related fields categorize and analyze women’s texts and labor. The opening section of the essay quantitatively analyzes book history companions, readers, and introductions to establish a baseline for how the field functions as a practice and discourse. The second section then analyzes the version of bibliography that has been canonized in book history, identifies how book history has explicitly favored a version of bibliography that is antagonistic to feminist work, and proposes a feminist narrative of bibliography that can and should be incorporated as the foundation for studies of the material book. The last section puts a feminist framework into practice and searches for women’s contributions to bibliographic labor in the Anglo-American world. It offers a new set of founders in bibliography and challenges contemporary bibliographers and book historians to re-evaluate on whom we place importance, how we define interpretive scholarship, and how we construct our discourse.

Highlights

  • I label these practices feminist bibliography, defined as the use of bibliographic methodologies to revise how book history and related fields categorize and analyze women’s texts and labor

  • Throughout, I argue that a philosophical revision of bibliographic methods promotes continued work on women’s writing and labor in book history, my primary interest, and interrelated fields like textual studies and digital humanities

  • It was critical theories that challenged long-held beliefs about aesthetic value and rewrote narratives of literary genealogy and greatness. This dissonance suggests that bibliography and book history were a haven for historically minded analysis, and for work that was free from the messiness of what critical theory introduced to the academy: diversity of subject matter

Read more

Summary

Introduction

I label these practices feminist bibliography, defined as the use of bibliographic methodologies to revise how book history and related fields categorize and analyze women’s texts and labor. I trace a narrative of twentieth-century women bibliographers and their labor as a new version of book history’s origins that creates roots and traditions from which a gendered discourse of book history can draw.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.