Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) vaginal insert with those of oxytocin for labor induction. The present study also examined whether its use reduces the rate of cesarean delivery in term pregnancies with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and low Bishop scores. A total of 240 women with singleton pregnancies at >or= 37 weeks, no prior uterine scar, vertex presentations, reactive nonstress tests, PROM for >or= 12 hours and Bishop scores of <or= 6 were randomly assigned to receive either oxytocin or vaginal PGE(2). The primary outcomes were time from induction to delivery and mode of delivery. The time from labor induction to active labor onset was significantly shorter in the oxytocin group than in the PGE(2) group (4.9 +/- 4.1 vs. 8.5 +/- 3.6 hours; p = 0.02). The time from induction to delivery was also significantly shorter in the oxytocin group (3.4 +/- 1.5 vs. 9.6 +/- 4.7 hours; p = 0.02). Cesarean delivery rates were statistically similar in the oxytocin and PGE(2) groups (18.3 vs. 20.0%; p = 0.81). Neonatal outcomes were comparable in both groups. Comparable results were observed for nulliparous women included in the study population. Oxytocin treatment seems to be superior to vaginal administration of PGE(2) to induce labor in term pregnancies complicated with PROM and unfavorable services.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
