Abstract

For environmental studies, identifying road and rail noise is important in projecting potential impacts from increased operations and also in identifying the window/wall attenuation needed to reduce outdoor to indoor noise levels. The Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) transit noise and vibration impact assessment procedures provide spreadsheets for estimating noise levels at specific receptor points. However, computer models such as SoundPLAN and CadnaA are also available. Because these computer models have complex input requirements and account for local terrain, they are rarely used for large corridor studies, but they are well suited to smaller sites. This study compares the FTA procedures with CadnaA modeling at a development site in the Bronx, NY, that is bounded by multiple rail lines and is proximate to a major highway. Discussion of results presents the advantages and disadvantages of each approach and identifies the conditions under which each approach is most appropriate.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.