Abstract
Simple SummaryMonoclonal antibody-bearing radionuclides have been under clinical investigation over the last two decades for their use in theranostic (diagnostic and therapeutic) applications in cancer. However, despite the numerous trials that have been conducted, only two radioimmunotherapies (RIT) have been approved by the FDA for the targeted therapy of hematologic tumors expressing CD20 antigens. Moreover, RIT applications for solid cancers faced major issues—such as radiotoxicity due to low antibodies penetrance requiring substantial curative dose—where new discoveries concerning antibody engineering or radionuclides are trying to overcome. Here, we performed an overview of the last 11-year clinical trials involving RIT for solid and non-solid cancers conducted either with full antibodies or antibody fragments. We discussed the low-to-moderate efficiency of RIT compared to conventional therapies and described the last advances in clinic for antibodies carriers (F(ab′)2, Fab′, ScFv). Finally, we discussed about the complexity of RIT as a therapy and depicted both the issues and the prospects of such a strategy. The specific irradiation of tumors with selective radiolabeled antibodies constitutes an attractive therapeutic approach. Consequent preclinical research has been conducted by both biologists to identify pertinent targets and to select corresponding antibodies (mAb) and by radiochemists to radiolabel mAbs. These numerous preclinical investigations have ascertained the therapeutic interest of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) protocols in mice models. Here, we summarize the clinical studies that have been performed the last decade, including clinical trials (phases I, II, and III), prospective and retrospective studies, and cases series. We thereby reported 92 clinical studies. Among them, 62 concern the treatment of hematological malignancies, and 30 concern solid tumors. For hematologic diseases, the analysis was complex due to the high discrepancy of therapeutic strategies (first-line therapy, consolidation, stem cell transplantation conditioning) as well as the high variety of malignancies that were treated. The clinical studies from the last decade failed to expand anti-CD20 RIT indications but confirmed that RIT using radiolabeled anti-CD20 remains a pertinent choice for patients with relapse follicular lymphomas. For solid tumors, the positive benefit of RIT is more mitigated, apart for few malignancies that can be treated locally. Clinical trials also demonstrated the potential of some antibody formats, such as F(ab′)2, which has already been approved by the China State FDA under the trend name Licartin®. Despite disparate results, mAb fragments are an interesting prospect for the improvement of RIT efficiency as well as for pretargeted strategies that delay the injection of radioactive treatments from the mAb ones.
Highlights
When addressing the role of radionuclides and their action toward tumor antigens, the use of monoclonal antibodies as vectors has been a great challenge since the 1980s
During the first decade of the 2000s, positive clinical results led to the subsequent FDA-approval of two radioimmunoconjugates, 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin®, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) in 2002 and 131I-tositumomab (Bexxar ®, GSK, Brentford, UK) in 2003, both of which are based on murine anti-CD20
Even though the clinical interest and good RIT tolerance were undeniable for some hematologic malignancies such as follicular lymphoma (FL), which has led to the approval of the two main radiolabeled anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), the last decade failed to extend the use of RIT in other indications
Summary
When addressing the role of radionuclides and their action toward tumor antigens, the use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) as vectors has been a great challenge since the 1980s. A previous review discussed the effects of (1) crossfire irradiation, which induces the irradiation of juxtracrine cells (Figure 1A); (2) bystander effects, which occur through communication between targeted cells and the surrounding cells (Figure 1B); and (3) the abscopal effect, which is characterized by the death of non-targeted cells that are distant from the targeted cells (Figure 1C) [6,8]. These three processes result in oxidative stress followed by cell death following macromolecule alterations. We report and discuss RIT efficacy for both hematological and solid tumors based on clinical trial data as well as prospects based on the use of fragments or pretargeting strategies
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.