Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

With more than 230,000 new cases each year in the United States, prostate cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed among American men [(1)][1] . Prostate cancer is expected to account for nearly 30,000 deaths in the United States in 2004 and consequently represents the second most common cause of

PNFLBA-11 RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY VERSUS OBSERVATION FOR EARLY PROSTATE CANCER: FOLLOW-UP RESULTS OF THE PROSTATE CANCER INTERVENTION VERSUS OBSERVATION TRIAL (PIVOT)

BackgroundWe previously found no significant differences in mortality between men who underwent surgery for localized prostate cancer and those who were treated with observation only. Uncertainty persists regarding nonfatal health outcomes and long-term mortality.MethodsFrom November 1994 through January 2002, we randomly assigned 731 men with localized prostate cancer to radical prostatectomy or observation. We extended follow-up through August 2014 for our primary outcome, all-cause mortality, and the main secondary outcome, prostate-cancer mortality. We describe disease progression, treatments received, and patient-reported outcomes through January 2010 (original follow-up).ResultsDuring 19.5 years of follow-up (median, 12.7 years), death occurred in 223 of 364 men (61.3%) assigned to surgery and in 245 of 367 (66.8%) assigned to observation (absolute difference in risk, 5.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.5 to 12.4; hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.01; P=0.06). Death attributed to prostate cancer or treatment occurred in 27 men (7.4%) assigned to surgery and in 42 men (11.4%) assigned to observation (absolute difference in risk, 4.0 percentage points; 95% CI, −0.2 to 8.3; hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.02; P=0.06). Surgery may have been associated with lower all-cause mortality than observation among men with intermediate-risk disease (absolute difference, 14.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.8 to 25.6) but not among those with low-risk disease (absolute difference, 0.7 percentage points; 95% CI, −10.5 to 11.8) or high-risk disease (absolute difference, 2.3 percentage points; 95% CI, −11.5 to 16.1) (P=0.08 for interaction). Treatment for disease progression was less frequent with surgery than with observation (absolute difference, 26.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 19.0 to 32.9); treatment was primarily for asymptomatic, local, or biochemical (prostate-specific antigen) progression. Urinary incontinence and erectile and sexual dysfunction were each greater with surgery than with observation through 10 years. Disease-related or treatment-related limitations in activities of daily living were greater with surgery than with observation through 2 years.ConclusionsAfter nearly 20 years of follow-up among men with localized prostate cancer, surgery was not associated with significantly lower all-cause or prostate-cancer mortality than observation. Surgery was associated with a higher frequency of adverse events than observation but a lower frequency of treatment for disease progression, mostly for asymptomatic, local, or biochemical progression. (Funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs and others; PIVOT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00007644.)

Lifelong Yearly Prostate Specific Antigen Surveillance is Not Necessary for Low Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy

α1-Adrenergic receptor antagonists are commonly used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia. Preclinical studies suggest that they induce cell death and inhibit tumor growth. This study evaluated the risk of prostate cancer death in men using α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists. A population-based cohort study in Stockholm, Sweden (January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2019) included 451 779 men with a prostate-specific antigen test result. Study entry was 1 year after the first prostate-specific antigen test. Men were considered exposed at their second filled prescription. The primary outcome was prostate cancer mortality. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and prostate cancer incidence. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all outcomes. Inverse-probability weighting with marginal structural models accounted for time-dependent confounders. Of 351 297 men in the final cohort, 39 856 (11.3%) were exposed to α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists. Median (interquartile range) follow-up for prostate cancer mortality was 8.9 (5.1-10.9) years; median (interquartile range) exposure time to α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists was 4.4 (2.0-7.6) years. There was no evidence of an association between α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist use and prostate cancer mortality, all-cause mortality, or high-grade prostate cancer. α1-Adrenergic receptor antagonist use was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer (HR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.17) and low-grade prostate cancer (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.33). Men whose prostate cancer was treated with α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists underwent more frequent prostate-specific antigen testing. Our findings show no significant association between α1-adrenergic receptor adrenoceptor antagonist exposure and prostate cancer mortality or high-grade prostate cancer. Although the preclinical evidence indicates a potential chemopreventive effect, this study's findings do not support it.

LACK OF ASSOCIATION OF PROSTATE CARCINOMA NUCLEAR GRADING WITH PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

Management of patients with rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy

To explore if there is a long-term association between baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA), including free/total PSA ratio and long-term (30-year) risk for prostate cancer death. In all, 1782 men were screened for prostate cancer through PSA analysis. Some years later, frozen plasma samples were used to calculate the ratio of free to total PSA (f/t PSA). At 30-year follow-up, baseline PSA and f/t PSA were compared with recent data extracts from the Swedish Cause of Death Registry and Swedish Cancer Registry. PSA values and f/t PSA values were treated as continuous variables in a multivariable analysis and also stratified according to their distribution and useful clinical thresholds. Risk of death from prostate cancer after 30years of follow-up was significantly increased with a higher baseline PSA level, with the hazard ratio being 1.04 (95% confidence interval 1.03-1.09) per increase of one unit of PSA. Adding f/t PSA increased the model's ability to discriminate (concordance index 0.84-0.88). Men with PSA levels <1.0ng/mL had a very low long-term risk of prostate cancer death (1.2% risk). An f/t PSA ≥ 0.25 extended the low-risk range to PSA < 2.0ng/mL (1.5% risk). Prostate-specific antigen testing can be carried out less frequently or can be discontinued in men aged 55-70years if their PSA levels are <2.0ng/mL and the f/t PSA is ≥0.25.

Editorial

Radical Prostatectomy or Observation for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Extended Follow-up of the Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT)

ULTRASENSITIVE SERUM PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN NADIR ACCURATELY PREDICTS THE RISK OF EARLY RELAPSE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

DETECTION OF MICROMETASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER CELLS IN THE LYMPH NODES BY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION IS PREDICTIVE OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE IN PATHOLOGICAL STAGE T2 PROSTATE CANCER.

Survival Among Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy or Radiation Therapy in the Prostate Specific Antigen Era

Prostate cancer is a major public health problem with considerable uncertainties about the effectiveness of population screening and treatment options. We report the study design, participant sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and the initial results of the testing and diagnostic phase of the Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) trial, which aims to investigate the effectiveness of treatments for localised prostate cancer. In this randomised phase 3 trial, men aged 50-69 years registered at 337 primary care centres in nine UK cities were invited to attend a specialist nurse appointment for a serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. Prostate biopsies were offered to men with a PSA concentration of 3·0 μg/L or higher. Consenting participants with clinically localised prostate cancer were randomly assigned to active monitoring (surveillance strategy), radical prostatectomy, or three-dimensional conformal external-beam radiotherapy by a computer-generated allocation system. Randomisation was stratified by site (minimised for differences in participant age, PSA results, and Gleason score). The primary endpoint is prostate cancer mortality at a median 10-year follow-up, ascertained by an independent committee, which will be analysed by intention to treat in 2016. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02044172, and as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN20141297. Between Oct 1, 2001, and Jan 20, 2009, 228,966 men were invited to attend an appointment with a specialist nurse. Of the invited men, 100,444 (44%) attended their initial appointment and 82,429 (82%) of attenders had a PSA test. PSA concentration was below the biopsy threshold in 73,538 (89%) men. Of the 8566 men with a PSA concentration of 3·0-19·9 μg/L, 7414 (87%) underwent biopsies. 2896 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer (4% of tested men and 39% of those who had a biopsy), of whom 2417 (83%) had clinically localised disease (mostly T1c, Gleason score 6). With the addition of 247 pilot study participants recruited between 1999 and 2001, 2664 men were eligible for the treatment trial and 1643 (62%) agreed to be randomly assigned (545 to active monitoring, 545 to radiotherapy, and 553 to radical prostatectomy). Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of randomly assigned participants were balanced across treatment groups. The ProtecT trial randomly assigned 1643 men with localised prostate cancer to active monitoring, radiotherapy, or surgery. Participant clinicopathological features are more consistent with contemporary patient characteristics than in previous prostate cancer treatment trials. UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.