Abstract
AbstractAlthough Maluku's Ambonese people have been included and excluded on the basis of religion and ethnicity by the Indonesian state, it is religious identity that is politically salient. Despite the best efforts of Maluku's elites to cultivate ethnic solidarities, Ambonese identity not become politically relevant. Why is this the case? I argue that Ambonese ethnic identity did not become politically salient because the quotidian institutions and practices that mediate the lived experience of ordinary Ambonese reinforced attachments to religious communities, rather than ethnic ones. For this reason, Ambonese have weak attachments to ethnic categories. This article therefore highlights that 1) looking at the state yields only a partial account of identity formation, and 2) focusing on the quotidian processes of identity formation helps explain both the depths of emotional attachment to particular identities and the precise mechanisms enabling the continuity of these identities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.