Quantitative evidence of complex metrical prosody in Chugach Alutiiq

BackgroundSystematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence can provide a rich understanding of complex phenomena. This type of review is increasingly popular, has been used to provide a landscape of existing knowledge, and addresses the types of questions not usually covered in reviews relying solely on either quantitative or qualitative evidence. Although several typologies of synthesis designs have been developed, none have been tested on a large sample of reviews. The aim of this review of reviews was to identify and develop a typology of synthesis designs and methods that have been used and to propose strategies for synthesizing qualitative and quantitative evidence.MethodsA review of systematic reviews combining qualitative and quantitative evidence was performed. Six databases were searched from inception to December 2014. Reviews were included if they were systematic reviews combining qualitative and quantitative evidence. The included reviews were analyzed according to three concepts of synthesis processes: (a) synthesis methods, (b) sequence of data synthesis, and (c) integration of data and synthesis results.ResultsA total of 459 reviews were included. The analysis of this literature highlighted a lack of transparency in reporting how evidence was synthesized and a lack of consistency in the terminology used. Two main types of synthesis designs were identified: convergent and sequential synthesis designs. Within the convergent synthesis design, three subtypes were found: (a) data-based convergent synthesis design, where qualitative and quantitative evidence is analyzed together using the same synthesis method, (b) results-based convergent synthesis design, where qualitative and quantitative evidence is analyzed separately using different synthesis methods and results of both syntheses are integrated during a final synthesis, and (c) parallel-results convergent synthesis design consisting of independent syntheses of qualitative and quantitative evidence and an interpretation of the results in the discussion.ConclusionsPerforming systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence is challenging because of the multiple synthesis options. The findings provide guidance on how to combine qualitative and quantitative evidence. Also, recommendations are made to improve the conducting and reporting of this type of review.

BackgroundGood glycaemic control is a crucial part of diabetes management. Traditional assessment methods, including HbA1c checks and self-monitoring of blood glucose, can be unreliable and inaccurate. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offers a non-invasive and more detailed alternative. Availability of this technology is increasing worldwide. However, there is no current comprehensive evidence on the acceptability and feasibility of these devices. This is a protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence about acceptability and feasibility of CGM in people with diabetes.MethodsWe will search MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL for qualitative and quantitative evidence about the feasibility and acceptability of CGM in all populations with diabetes (any type) using search terms for “continuous glucose monitoring” and “diabetes”. We will not apply any study-type filters. Searches will be restricted to studies conducted in humans and those published from 2011 onwards. We will not restrict the search by language. Study selection and data extraction will be carried out by two reviewers independently using Rayyan and Eppi-Reviewer, respectively, with disagreements resolved by discussion. Data extraction will include key information about each study, as well as qualitative evidence in the form of participant quotes from primary studies and themes and subthemes based on the authors’ analysis. Quantitative data relating to acceptability and feasibility including data loss, adherence, and quantitative ratings of acceptability will be extracted as means and standard deviations or n/N as appropriate. Qualitative evidence will be analysed using framework analysis informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Where possible, quantitative evidence will be combined using random-effects meta-analysis; otherwise, a narrative synthesis will be performed. The most appropriate method for integrating qualitative and quantitative findings will be selected based on the data available.DiscussionOngoing assessment of the acceptability of interventions has been identified as crucially important to scale-up and implementation. This review will provide new knowledge with the potential to inform a programme theory of CGM as well as future roll-out to potentially vulnerable populations, including those with severe mental illness.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42021255141.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02126-9.

Patient-oriented research and the shiny object syndrome.

Obesity increases the risk of many serious illnesses such as coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes and osteoarthritis. More men than women are overweight or obese in the UK but men are less likely to perceive their weight as a problem and less likely to engage with weight-loss services. The aim of this study was to systematically review evidence-based management strategies for treating obesity in men and investigate how to engage men in obesity services by integrating the quantitative, qualitative and health economic evidence base. Electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database were searched from inception to January 2012, with a limited update search in July 2012. Subject-specific websites, reference lists and professional health-care and commercial organisations were also consulted. Six systematic reviews were conducted to consider the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and qualitative evidence on interventions for treating obesity in men, and men in contrast to women, and the effectiveness of interventions to engage men in their weight reduction. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with follow-up data of at least 1 year, or any study design and length of follow-up for UK studies, were included. Qualitative and mixed-method studies linked to RCTs and non-randomised intervention studies, and UK-based, men-only qualitative studies not linked to interventions were included. One reviewer extracted data from the included studies and a second reviewer checked data for omissions or inaccuracies. Two reviewers carried out quality assessment. We undertook meta-analysis of quantitative data and a realist approach to integrating the qualitative and quantitative evidence synthesis. From a total of 12,764 titles reviewed, 33 RCTs with 12 linked reports, 24 non-randomised reports, five economic evaluations with two linked reports, and 22 qualitative studies were included. Men were more likely than women to benefit if physical activity was part of a weight-loss programme. Reducing diets tended to produce more favourable weight loss than physical activity alone (mean weight change after 1 year from a reducing diet compared with an exercise programme -3.2 kg, 95% CI -4.8 kg to -1.6 kg). The type of reducing diet did not affect long-term weight loss. A reducing diet plus physical activity and behaviour change gave the most effective results. Low-fat reducing diets, some with meal replacements, combined with physical activity and behaviour change training gave the most effective long-term weight change in men [-5.2 kg (standard error 0.2 kg) after 4 years]. Such trials may prevent type 2 diabetes in men and improve erectile dysfunction. Although fewer men joined weight-loss programmes, once recruited they were less likely to drop out than women (difference 11%, 95% CI 8% to 14%). The perception of having a health problem (e.g. being defined as obese by a health professional), the impact of weight loss on health problems and desire to improve personal appearance without looking too thin were motivators for weight loss amongst men. The key components differ from those found for women, with men preferring more factual information on how to lose weight and more emphasis on physical activity programmes. Interventions delivered in social settings were preferred to those delivered in health-care settings. Group-based programmes showed benefits by facilitating support for men with similar health problems, and some individual tailoring of advice assisted weight loss in some studies. Generally, men preferred interventions that were individualised, fact-based and flexible, which used business-like language and which included simple to understand information. Preferences for men-only versus mixed-sex weight-loss group programmes were divided. In terms of context, programmes which were cited in a sporting context where participants have a strong sense of affiliation showed low drop out rates and high satisfaction. Although some men preferred weight-loss programmes delivered in an NHS context, the evidence comparing NHS and commercial programmes for men was unclear. The effect of family and friends on participants in weight-loss programmes was inconsistent in the evidence reviewed - benefits were shown in some cases, but the social role of food in maintaining relationships may also act as a barrier to weight loss. Evidence on the economics of managing obesity in men was limited and heterogeneous. The main limitations were the limited quantity and quality of the evidence base and narrow outcome reporting, particularly for men from disadvantaged and minority groups. Few of the studies were undertaken in the UK. Weight reduction for men is best achieved and maintained with the combination of a reducing diet, physical activity advice or a physical activity programme, and behaviour change techniques. Tailoring interventions and settings for men may enhance effectiveness, though further research is needed to better understand the influence of context and content. Future studies should include cost-effectiveness analyses in the UK setting. This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme.

Context is crucial for understanding social phenomena, but is not being addressed. Contexts can become socially entrenched and acquire their own labels, allowing different social coordination systems to be developed for different kinds of situation. Three ways to avoid context are discussed. Fitting data to mathematical models which 'explain' the data using significance tests avoids the problems of context, but may average over different contexts inappropriately. 'Behavioural foundationalism', which assumes a generic model of behaviour that is valid across different contexts, avoids the context problem by producing models based on a micro-specification to see if the macro-consequences match the available data, e.g. neo-classical decision theory and some agent-based simulations. A third strategy to avoid the context problem is to retreat into specificity, providing so much detail that the context is unique with no attempt at generalisation. Three ways forward are proposed (1) using data mining techniques to look for models whose output 'fits' various target kinds of behaviour, (2) context-dependent simulation modelling, with the memory of the agent being context-sensitive, and context-relevant knowledge and behaviours being applied in decision-making, and (3) combining qualitative and formal approaches, with neither qualitative nor quantitative evidence being ignored. Agent-based modelling can use qualitative evidence to inform the behavioural strategies that people use in given situations. Simulations based on micro-level behaviours can produce numbers for comparison with macro-level quantitative data. This supports experimentation to understand emerging processes, and investigate the coherence of the qualitative assumptions and the quantitative evidence. Explicitly recognising and including context-dependency in formal simulation models allows for a well-founded method for integrating qualitative, quantitative and formal modelling approaches in the social sciences. Then some of the wealth of qualitative ethnographic, observational and interviewing work of the social sciences can enrich formal simulation models directly, and allow the quantitative and the qualitative to be assessed together and against each other. Before the advent of cheap computing power, analytic mathematical models were the only formal models available, but their simplicity ruled out context dependency, leading to a focus on what generic models might tell us. New information and communication technologies have resulted in a lot more data on social phenomena to distinguish different contexts and behaviours. We no longer have to fit generic models due to data paucity and limits to storage and processing, or ignore context or over-simplify what we observe to obtain and use formal models. Addressing context has huge potential for the social sciences, including: better models and understanding of human behaviour; more effective ways of collecting, integrating and analysing data; and the prospect for a well-founded means of integrating the insights from quantitative and qualitative evidence and models.

Background/purpose: There is inadequate evidence of reported validity of the results of assessment instruments used to assess clinical competence. This study aimed at combining multiple lines of quantitative and qualitative evidence to support interpretation and use of assessment results.Method: This study is a mixed methods explanatory research set in two stages of data collection and analysis (QUAN : qual). Guided by Messick’s conceptual model, quantitative evidences as reliability and correlation coefficients of various validity components were calculated using students’ scores, grades and success rates of the whole population of students in 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 (n= 383; 326). The underlying values that scaffold validity evidences were identified via Focus Group Discussions (FGD) with faculty and students; sampling technique was purposive; and results were analyzed by content analysis.Results: (1) Themes that resulted from content analysis aligned with quantitative evidences. (2) Assessment results showed: (a) content validity (table of specifications and blueprinting in another study); (b) consequential validity (positive unintended consequences resulted from new assessment approach); (c) relationships to other variables [a statistically significant correlation among various assessment methods; with combined score (0.64–0.86) and between mid and final exam results (r = 0.672)]; (d) internal consistency (high reliability of MCQ and OSCE: 0.81, 0.80); (3) success rates and grades distribution alone could not provide evidence to advocate an argument on validity of results.Conclusion: The unified approach pursued in this study created a strong evidential basis for meaningful interpretation of assessment scores that could be applied in clinical assessments.

This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness of women's economic self‐help groups (ESHG) on individual women empowerment in low‐and middle‐income countries. It also examines the mechanisms that empower women through female participants' experiences of ESHG membership. The review summarises findings from 23 quantitative studies and 11 qualitative studies. The vast majority of these studies was conducted in South Asia. ESHG have positive effects on women's economic and political empowerment, as well as social empowerment ‐ such as, women's family size decision‐making power and social mobility. There is no quantitative evidence to indicate positive effects on women's psychological empowerment. However, the qualitative studies suggest that women participating in ESHG perceive themselves as psychologically empowered. ESHG with a training component, such as financial and business education or life skills training, have a larger effect than programs that do not involve training. Important mechanisms which facilitate empowerment are gaining financial skills (economic empowerment); gaining the capability to speak in front of others, access to household decision‐making (psychological empowerment); improved networks and the experience of mutual support from and solidarity with fellow group members (social empowerment); and access to wider social participation combined with an increased understanding of political contexts and individual rights (political empowerment). There is no evidence of increased levels of domestic violence. Qualitative data indicate that ESHG may decrease domestic violence as women gain respect from their partners, families and access to household decision‐making. Few qualitative studies report experiences of disappointment, mistrust and stigma among women who attended ESHG. ESHGs do not reach the poorest citizens. The ‘poorest of the poor’ do not participate for economic and religious reasons, and mechanisms of self‐selection. Plain language summary Motivation: Self‐help groups (SHGs) are implemented around the world to empower women, supported by many developing country governments and agencies. A relatively large number of studies purport to demonstrate the effectiveness of SHGs. This is the first systematic review of that evidence. Approach: We conducted a systematic review of the effectiveness of women's economic SHG programs, incorporating evidence from quantitative and qualitative studies. We systematically searched for published and unpublished literature, and applied inclusion criteria based on the study protocol. We critically appraised all included studies and used a combination of statistical meta‐analysis and meta‐ethnography to synthesize the findings based on a theory of change. Findings from quantitative synthesis: Our review suggests that economic SHGs have positive effects on various dimensions of women's empowerment, including economic, social, and political empowerment. However, we did not find evidence for positive effects of SHGs on psychological empowerment. Our findings further suggest there are important variations in the impacts of SHGs on empowerment that are associated with program design and contextual characteristics. Findings from qualitative synthesis: Women's perspectives on factors determining their participation in, and benefits from, SHGs suggest various pathways through which SHGs could achieve the identified positive impacts. Evidence suggested that the positive effects of SHGs on economic, social, and political empowerment run through the channels of familiarity with handling money and independence in financial decision making, solidarity, improved social networks, and respect from the household and other community members. In contrast to the quantitative evidence, the qualitative synthesis suggests that women participating in SHGs perceive themselves to be psychologically empowered. Women also perceive low participation of the poorest of the poor in SHGs due to various barriers, which could potentially limit the benefits the poorest could gain from SHG membership. Findings from integrated synthesis: Our integration of the quantitative and qualitative evidence suggests there is no evidence for adverse effects of women's SHGs on the likelihood of domestic violence. Women's perspectives in the qualitative research indicate that even if domestic violence occurs in the short term, in the long term the benefits from SHG membership may mitigate the initial adverse consequences of SHGs on domestic violence. Executive Summary BACKGROUND Women bear an unequal share of the burden of poverty globally due to societal and structural barriers. One way that governments, development agencies, and grassroots women's groups have tried to address these inequalities is through women's SHGs. This review focuses on the impacts of SHGs with a broad range of collective finance, enterprise, and livelihood components on women's political, economic, social, and psychological empowerment. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to examine the impact of women's economic SHGs on women's individual‐level empowerment in low‐ and middle‐income countries using evidence from rigorous quantitative evaluations. The secondary objective was to examine the perspectives of female participants on their experiences of empowerment as a result of participation in economic SHGs in low‐and middle‐income countries using evidence from high‐quality qualitative evaluations. We conducted an integrated mixed‐methods systematic review that examined data generated through both quantitative and qualitative research methods. SEARCH METHODS We searched electronic databases, grey literature, relevant journals and organization websites and performed keyword hand searches and requested recommendation from key personnel. The search was conducted from March 2013–February 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies conducted from 1980–January 2014 that examined the impact of SHGs on the empowerment of and perspectives of women of all ages in low‐ and middle‐income countries, as defined by the World Bank, who participated in SHGs in which female participants physically came together and received a collective finance and enterprise and/or livelihoods group intervention. To be included in the review, quantitative studies had to measure economic empowerment, political empowerment, psychological empowerment or social empowerment. We also examined adverse outcomes including intimate partner violence, stigma, disappointment, and reduced subjective well‐being. We included quantitative studies with experimental designs using random assignment to the intervention and quasi‐experimental designs with non‐random assignment (such as regression discontinuity designs, “natural experiments,” and studies in which participants self‐select into the program). In addition, we included qualitative studies that explored empowerment from the perspectives of women participants in SHGs using in‐depth interviews, ethnography/participant observation, and focus groups. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We systematically coded information from the included studies and critically appraised them. We conducted statistical meta‐analysis from the data extracted from quantitative experimental and quasi‐experimental studies, and used meta‐ethnographic methods to synthesize the textual data extracted from the women's quotes in the qualitative studies. We then integrated the findings from the qualitative synthesis with those from the quantitative studies to develop a framework for assessing how economic SHGs might impact women's empowerment. RESULTS We included a total of 23 quantitative and 11 qualitative studies in the final analysis. Initially, we reviewed 3,536 abstracts from electronic database searches and 351 abstracts from the gray literature searches. We found that women's economic SHGs have positive statistically significant effects on various dimensions of women's empowerment, including economic, social and political empowerment ranging from 0.06‐0.41 SD. We did not find evidence for statistically significant effects of SHGs on psychological empowerment. We also did not find statistical evidence of adverse effects of women's SHGs. Our integration of the quantitative and qualitative evidence indicates that SHGs do not have adverse consequences for domestic violence. Our synthesis of women's perspectives on factors determining their participation in, and benefits from SHGs suggests various pathways through which SHGs could achieve the identified positive impacts on empowerment. Women's experiences suggested that the positive effects of SHGs on economic, social, and political empowerment run through several channels including: familiarity with handling money and independence in financial decision making; solidarity; improved social networks; and respect from the household and other community members. Our synthesis of the qualitative evidence (key informant interviews and focus groups) also indicates that women perceive there to be low participation of the poorest of the poor in SHGs, as compared to less poor women. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY, PRACTICE AND RESEARCH</jats

Many key development outcomes depend on women's ability to negotiate favorable intrahousehold allocations of resources. Yet it has been difficult to clearly identify which policies can increase women's bargaining power and result in better outcomes. This paper reviews both the analytical frameworks and the empirical evidence on the importance of women's bargaining power. It argues that there is sufficient evidence from rigorous studies to conclude that women's bargaining power does affect outcomes. But in many specific instances, the quantitative evidence cannot rigorously identify causality. In these cases, a combination of quantitative and qualitative evidence may suggest policy levers. Taken together, there are sufficient data in place to support a greatly expanded focus on intrahousehold outcomes and bargaining power. Additional data at the individual level will allow for further and more detailed research. A growing literature supports the current conventional wisdom -- namely, that the patterns of evidence suggest that women's education, incomes, and assets all are important aspects of women's bargaining power.

This mixed-method systematic review synthesised quantitative and qualitative empirical evidence on how cognitive dissonance triggered by care experiences and circumstances affects nurses' well-being, professional behaviour, patient care and on the coping strategies nurses use to manage these experiences. Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance, a convergent integrated synthesis approach combined qualitative and quantitative findings. Sixteen studies were included following a comprehensive search across five databases in August 2024. Sixteen studies were included: 12 qualitative, two quantitative and two mixed-methods. Four key themes were identified: (i) dissonance is triggered by conflicting demands, (ii) dissonance discomfort may generate lasting distress, (iii) dissonance influences nursing practice and quality of care and (iv) dissonance reduction efforts varied. Overall, the evidence base was limited in scope and predominantly qualitative, with included studies generally showing moderate to high methodological quality. Cognitive dissonance is a common but under-recognised challenge in nursing. It arises when actions conflict with professional standards or when nurses are prevented from providing necessary care. If unresolved, it harms nurses' psychological well-being, causing stress, emotional strain and reduced job satisfaction. It may also reduce the quality of care in nursing practice. There is a need for validated measurement tools, longitudinal research exploring long-term impacts and targeted interventions to support nurses. This review is the first to systematically synthesise qualitative and quantitative evidence on cognitive dissonance in nursing. It addresses an important gap by bringing together findings on how dissonance arises in clinical settings, how nurses experience and manage it and its effects on practice and patient care. It also contributes to our understanding of coping strategies nurses use to cope with cognitive dissonance. The findings will support future research, education and interventions aimed at improving care quality and nurse well-being. No patient or public involvement.

Background and ObjectivesTo effectively customize Parkinson disease (PD) programs, it is important to incorporate the “individual's voice” and have a thorough understanding of the symptom priorities of people with PD (PwP) and care partners (CP). In this convergent integrated mixed-method systematic review, we aimed to analyze qualitative and quantitative evidence of PD motor and nonmotor symptoms affecting health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in PwP and CP, comparing priorities across different levels of disease severity.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global; and the Michael J. Fox Foundation Data Resources for studies published up to June 29, 2022. We included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies investigating PD symptom priorities among PwP and CP. We critically appraised eligible studies for methodological quality using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. Derived terms were mapped and coded according to thematic attribution. Independent syntheses of qualitative and quantitative evidence and transformation of quantitative data into qualitative formats were performed.ResultsOf the 7,716 identified studies, we included 70 that provided qualitative (n = 13), quantitative (n = 53), and mixed (n = 4) evidence. We included 604 mapped terms representing 11 PwP-identified and CP-identified motor and nonmotor symptom categories. Across all PD stages, both PwP and CP considered 5 domains more affecting their HRQOL, namely: “motor functionality,” “mood,” “cognition,” “gait, balance, posture, and falls,” and “nighttime sleep disorders.” In early disease, PwP and CP considered “mood” the domain that most affected their HRQOL. In advanced PD, PwP considered “pain” the domain that most affects their HRQOL, while CP considered “psychiatric symptoms.” The domain “gait, balance, posture, and falls” was equally considered by both PwP and CP as the second domain that most affects their HRQOL in the advanced stage of PD.DiscussionThe ranking of the priority of symptoms is largely shared by PwP and CP, and motor symptom priorities dominate the full disease spectrum. However, the nonmotor symptom priorities shift according to the disease severity stage. Tailored care and research require that providers consider these shifting priorities and incorporate the “individual's voice” into treatment decisions.

BackgroundLandmark studies in adult-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) populations indicate that improved glycaemic control through use of intensive insulin therapy is strongly associated with reduced risk for the development of diabetes-related complications and mortality in later years. However, it is unclear whether these associations can be extrapolated to childhood-onset T1D, given the influence of other important biological and psychosocial determinants of glycaemic control, particularly during adolescence. The aims of the review are (1) to investigate the impact of early glycaemic control (within the first 2 years after diagnosis) on subsequent glycaemic trends and risk of complications during the life course of childhood-onset T1D and (2) to identify the predictors of early glycaemic control in children and young people (0–25 years).MethodsThe methods used in this study are systematic identification, review and mapping of quantitative (intervention and observational) and qualitative literature; assessing the effect and predictors of early glycaemic control in T1D (diagnosed ≤18 years) on risk or prevalence of later complications. An iterated search strategy, with no language or period restrictions, was applied to identify studies from six electronic databases. This will be supplemented by hand-searching (reference lists and contacting authors of studies meeting the inclusion criteria). Studies assessing glycaemic control within the first 2 years of diagnosis in children (at baseline) will be quality-assessed against predefined criteria and mapped descriptively to future health outcomes. Extracted data will be analysed and synthesised using narrative and forest plots or harvest plots for quantitative evidence and thematic analyses for qualitative studies. To get a deeper understanding of the predictors of early glycaemic control in reducing complications in childhood and adult life, we will integrate qualitative and quantitative evidence using mixed methods or parallel synthesis approach.DiscussionThese linked reviews will be the first to systematically investigate the effects of early glycaemic control and integrate both the quantitative and qualitative evidence on predictors of early glycaemic control in childhood-onset T1D in reducing future diabetes complications. This will help identify and map current research and inform development of effective future interventions.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42015024546Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0146-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

To establish current knowledge about the efficacy and acceptance of intentional rounding in current practice, from the perspective of nurses, patients, patient satisfaction and safety indicators. Intentional rounding is a formal means of nursing staff checking care needs of patients in hospital settings on a regular basis. An integrative literature review conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute manual. A literature search from 2000 - 2017 was conducted using the following electronic databases: The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ProQuest, PubMed, Informit, Sage and Scopus. Articles were assessed for quality and rigor using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tool for Quantitative Studies. A sequential explanatory mixed studies approach was used to combine qualitative and quantitative evidence in a single review. In-depth parallel reviews of the quantitative and qualitative evidence were undertaken, and then a synthesis of the combined qualitative and quantitative evidence conducted. Intentional rounding has positive outcomes on patient satisfaction and safety. Nurses perceive benefits related to intentional rounding; however, some nurses perceive it as an additional, unnecessary task. The effectiveness of intentional rounding is influenced by external factors including leadership and formal rounding education, workload, ward layout, staffing and experience level. Intentional rounding is a positive intervention in patient safety and satisfaction generally, but needs further research and consideration about actual impact, staff delegation, education and engagement, student nurse involvement, documentation and specializing the structure of intentional rounding.

Numerical and Formal Analysis in United States History method of the statistician as well as that of the critic of evidence is absolutely essential. Turner wrote these words in I904, expressing convictions which this distinguished historian retained throughout his life, as did many of his students and professional colleagues throughout their careers. But, despite the commitment of some American historians to quantitative analysis from the I89os to the I930s, their techniques were relatively crude; interest in quantitative evidence was low by the I940s except among economic historians. Turnerian quantifiers seem not to have used, nor at least emphasized, the word quantification. It slipped unobtrusively into the working vocabulary of historians in the United States during the late 1950s and early I96os. In 1959 the Social Science Research Council sponsored a Conference on the History of Quantification in the Social Sciences. The papers presented there were published in a volume entitled Quantification: A History of the Meaning of Measurement in the Natural and Social Sciences. In the editor's eyes, measurement was a satisfactory synonym for quantification.1 To American historians today, quantification still suggests measurement, but it is also a code word that brings related issues to mind involving the identification, processing, and administrative control of quantitative historical evidence in the form of machine-readable data, as well as the conceptual framework and

Background: Healthy dietary behaviours are essential for maintaining health, functional independence, and quality of life in later life. Family members are a key source of social support for community-dwelling older adults, yet the ways in which family support shapes older adults' dietary behaviours, particularly among those who retain autonomy, remain insufficiently synthesized. Therefore, this review aims to map how family support influences dietary behaviours among community-dwelling older adults by examining the forms, roles, and contextual influences of family support within a Social Support Theory framework. Methods: Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and PRISMA-ScR reporting standards, we conducted a scoping review of empirical studies published in English or Chinese. Searches were conducted across PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to 2025. Quantitative and qualitative evidence was synthesised using a convergent-segregated mixed-methods approach. Qualitative findings were deductively mapped to instrumental, informational, emotional, and esteem support domains. Results: Nineteen studies were included. Quantitative evidence indicated that family support, particularly shared meal preparation, joint dietary adherence, and autonomy-supportive encouragement, was generally associated with better diet quality, dietary adherence, and nutritional outcomes. Qualitative findings showed that the influence of family support depended on relationship dynamics and contextual factors, including communication patterns, autonomy negotiation, shared responsibility, and cultural expectations. Conclusions: Family support plays a multifaceted and context-dependent role in shaping dietary behaviours among community-dwelling older adults. These findings can inform the development of family-inclusive strategies and interventions that promote healthy dietary behaviours while respecting older adults' autonomy and relational contexts.

BackgroundThe aim of these reviews is to inform the design and content of interventions to reduce obesity in young children. The behaviors that are associated with obesity/overweight have been studied extensively; however, the factors associated with these behaviors in young children (0 to 6 years) have not been systematically reviewed. Over the past few years the focus of obesity prevention has shifted to preschool children because of the high prevalence of obesity at school entry and recognition that habits formed in early life could track into adulthood. In order to develop effective interventions and change behavior, it is important to understand the factors that are associated with those behaviors. For example, we need to understand whether it would be more important to target the family, childcare settings or the wider environment and identify the most effective way of changing these energy balance related behaviors.Methods/DesignQuantitative (intervention and observational) and qualitative literature on determinants/correlates of fruit and vegetable intake, sugar sweetened beverage and other unhealthy diet intake, and physical activity and sedentary behaviors in young children will be systematically identified, mapped and reviewed. A common search strategy (no language or period restrictions) will be used to identify papers from eight electronic databases and this will be supplemented by hand-searching. Next, studies in developed countries that examine the factors associated with these behaviors in children aged 0 to 6 years (at baseline) will be screened and mapped descriptively followed by in-depth data extraction, quality assessment and synthesis. Data from quantitative studies will be summarized using either forest plots or harvest plots and narrative synthesis, and qualitative studies using thematic analysis. Qualitative evidence will be integrated with the quantitative evidence, using a parallel synthesis approach, to provide a deeper understanding of effective strategies to influence these energy balance related behaviors.DiscussionIn addition to updating and mapping current research, these reviews will be the first to comprehensively synthesize and integrate both the quantitative and qualitative evidence pertaining to determinants/correlates/barriers/facilitators of obesity related behaviors in this young age group (0 to 6 years) with the aim of informing future interventions.Trial registrationInternational Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) Registration number: CRD42012002881