Quantitative Evaluation of Image Quality Improvement and Reduced Radiation Output with Photon-Counting CT in 4D Parathyroid Imaging.

Background Photon-counting CT (PCCT) has been shown to improve cardiovascular CT imaging in adults. Data in neonates, infants, and young children under the age of 3 years are missing. Purpose To compare image quality and radiation dose of ultrahigh-pitch PCCT with that of ultrahigh-pitch dual-source CT (DSCT) in children suspected of having congenital heart defects. Materials and Methods This is a prospective analysis of existing clinical CT studies in children suspected of having congenital heart defects who underwent contrast-enhanced PCCT or DSCT in the heart and thoracic aorta between January 2019 and October 2022. CT dose index and dose-length product were used to calculate effective radiation dose. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated by standardized region-of-interest analysis. SNR and CNR dose ratios were calculated. Visual image quality was assessed by four independent readers on a five-point scale: 5, excellent or absent; 4, good or minimal; 3, moderate; 2, limited or substantial; and 1, poor or massive. Results Contrast-enhanced PCCT (n = 30) or DSCT (n = 84) was performed in 113 children (55 female and 58 male participants; median age, 66 days [IQR, 15-270]; median height, 56 cm [IQR, 52-67]; and median weight, 4.5 kg [IQR, 3.4-7.1]). A diagnostic image quality score of at least 3 was obtained in 29 of 30 (97%) with PCCT versus 65 of 84 (77%) with DSCT. Mean overall image quality ratings were higher for PCCT versus DSCT (4.17 vs 3.16, respectively; P < .001). SNR and CNR were higher for PCCT versus DSCT with SNR (46.3 ± 16.3 vs 29.9 ± 15.3, respectively; P = .007) and CNR (62.0 ± 50.3 vs 37.2 ± 20.8, respectively; P = .001). Mean effective radiation doses were similar for PCCT and DSCT (0.50 mSv vs 0.52 mSv; P = .47). Conclusion At a similar radiation dose, PCCT offers a higher SNR and CNR and thus better cardiovascular imaging quality than DSCT in children suspected of having cardiac heart defects. © RSNA, 2023.

This study evaluates the feasibility of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT)-based coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using ultra-low flow contrast rate while maintaining diagnostic image quality. In this prospective trial, 292 patients underwent CCTA assigned to one of three protocols: ultra-low (1.5-1.8 mL/s) or routine (4.0-5.0 mL/s) contrast injection with PCD-CT, or routine injection with EID-CT. All scans utilized a high-pitch prospective electrocardiogram-triggering acquisition. PCD-CT images were reconstructed at 45 keV (ultra-low) or 60 keV (routine). Objective image quality was quantitatively assessed by measuring vessel attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Subjective image quality parameters (vascular contrast, image noise, artifacts, and vessel clarity) were independently evaluated by two blinded readers using a 4-point Likert scale (1: non-diagnostic; 2: adequate; 3: good; 4: excellent). Objective image quality demonstrated comparable attenuation, CNR, and SNR in proximal coronary segments across all groups (all p > 0.05). The ultra-low PCD-CT protocol significantly lowers attenuation in the distal LAD (373.20 ± 49.58 HU) compared to routine protocols (PCD-CT: 393.52 ± 49.38 HU; EID-CT: 396.72 ± 47.55 HU; p = 0.01). While distal vessel clarity scores were modestly reduced in distal vessel clarity (ultra-low PCD-CT: 2.91 ± 0.81 versus routine PCD-CT: 3.58 ± 0.50 versus routine EID-CT: 3.54 ± 0.50; p < 0.01). For patients with difficulty establishing venous access routes, ultra-low contrast agent flow rates in PCD-CT maintain objective image quality comparable to that of standard protocols, with acceptable diagnostic performance despite slight reductions. Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) maintains objective coronary CT angiography image quality comparable to standard protocols even at ultra-low contrast flow rates (1.5-1.8 mL/s), offering a clinically acceptable and safer alternative for patients with challenging venous access. First validation of ultra-low flow contrast rate CCTA using photon-counting CT (PCD-CT). Ultra-low flow rates maintain objective image quality (CNR/SNR) versus routine protocols. PCD-CT enables 50% contrast reduction without diagnostic compromise.

This study aimed to compare the image quality of portal venous phase-derived virtual noncontrast (VNC) images from photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) with energy-integrating dual-energy computed tomography (EI-DECT) in the same patient using quantitative and qualitative analyses. Consecutive patients retrospectively identified with available portal venous phase-derived VNC images from both PCCT and EI-DECT were included. Patients without available VNC in picture archiving and communication system in PCCT or prior EI-DECT and non-portal venous phase acquisitions were excluded. Three fellowship-trained radiologists blinded to VNC source qualitatively assessed VNC images on a 5-point scale for overall image quality, image noise, small structure delineation, noise texture, artifacts, and degree of iodine removal. Quantitative assessment used region-of-interest measurements within the aorta at 4 standard locations, both psoas muscles, both renal cortices, spleen, retroperitoneal fat, and inferior vena cava. Attenuation (Hounsfield unit), quantitative noise (Hounsfield unit SD), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) (CNR vascular , CNR kidney , CNR spleen , CNR fat ), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (SNR vascular , SNR kidney , SNR spleen , SNR fat ), and radiation dose were compared between PCCT and EI-DECT with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. A P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. A total of 74 patients (27 men; mean ± SD age, 63 ± 13 years) were included. Computed tomography dose index volumes for PCCT and EI-DECT were 9.2 ± 3.5 mGy and 9.4 ± 9.0 mGy, respectively ( P = 0.06). Qualitatively, PCCT VNC images had better overall image quality, image noise, small structure delineation, noise texture, and fewer artifacts (all P < 0.00001). Virtual noncontrast images from PCCT had lower attenuation (all P < 0.05), noise ( P = 0.006), and higher CNR ( P < 0.0001-0.04). Contrast-enhanced structures had lower SNR on PCCT ( P = 0.001, 0.002), reflecting greater contrast removal. The SNRfat (nonenhancing) was higher for PCCT than EI-DECT ( P < 0.00001). Virtual noncontrast images from PCCT had improved image quality, lower noise, improved CNR and SNR compared with those derived from EI-DECT.

BackgroundRegular disease monitoring with low-dose high-resolution (LD-HR) computed tomography (CT) scans is necessary for the clinical management of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). The aim of this study was to compare the image quality and radiation dose of LD-HR protocols between photon-counting CT (PCCT) and energy-integrating detector system CT (EID-CT) in pwCF.MethodsThis retrospective study included 23 pwCF undergoing LD-HR chest CT with PCCT who had previously undergone LD-HR chest CT with EID-CT. An intraindividual comparison of radiation dose and image quality was conducted. The study measured the dose-length product, volumetric CT dose index, effective dose and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Three blinded radiologists assessed the overall image quality, image sharpness, and image noise using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (deficient) to 5 (very good) for image quality and image sharpness and from 1 (very high) to 5 (very low) for image noise.ResultsPCCT used approximately 42% less radiation dose than EID-CT (median effective dose 0.54 versus 0.93 mSv, p < 0.001). PCCT was consistently rated higher than EID-CT for overall image quality and image sharpness. Additionally, image noise was lower with PCCT compared to EID-CT. The average SNR of the lung parenchyma was lower with PCCT compared to EID-CT (p < 0.001).ConclusionIn pwCF, LD-HR chest CT protocols using PCCT scans provided significantly better image quality and reduced radiation exposure compared to EID-CT.Relevance statementIn pwCF, regular follow-up could be performed through photon-counting CT instead of EID-CT, with substantial advantages in terms of both lower radiation exposure and increased image quality.Key PointsPhoton-counting CT (PCCT) and energy-integrating detector system CT (EID-CT) were compared in 23 people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF).Image quality was rated higher for PCCT than for EID-CT.PCCT used approximately 42% less radiation dose and offered superior image quality than EID-CT.Graphical

Feasibility of ultra-high-resolution abdominal CT angiography in PCCT in outperforming conventional EICT.

Comparison of Low Dose Performance of Photon-Counting and Energy Integrating CT

Purpose To determine whether photon-counting CT (PCCT) acquisition of whole-body CT images provides similar quantitative image quality and reader satisfaction for multiple myeloma screening at lower radiation doses than does standard energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. Materials and Methods Patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance prospectively underwent clinical noncontrast whole-body CT with EID and same-day PCCT (August-December 2021). Five axial scan locations were evaluated by seven radiologists, with 11% (eight of 70) of images including osteolytic lesions. Images were shown in randomized order, and each reader rated the following: discernibility of the osseous cortex and osseous trabeculae, perceived image noise level, and diagnostic confidence. Presence of lytic osseous lesions was indicated. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were calculated. Comparisons were made using paired t tests and mixed linear effects models. Results Seven participants (four women) were included (mean age, 66 years ± 9 [SD]; body mass index, 30.1 kg/m2 ± 5.2). Mean cortical definition, trabecular definition, image noise, and image quality scores were 83, 67, 75, and 78 versus 84, 66, 74, and 76 for EID and PCCT, respectively (P = .65, .11, .26, and .11, respectively). PCCT helped identify more lesions (79% [22 of 28]) than did EID (64% [18 of 28]). CNRs and SNRs were similar between modalities. PCCT had lower radiation doses than EID (volume CT dose index: EID, 11.37 ± 2.8 vs PCCT, 1.8 ± 0.6 [P = .06]; dose-length product: EID, 1654.1 ± 409.6 vs PCCT, 253.4 ± 89.6 [P = .05]). Conclusion This pilot investigation suggests that PCCT affords similar quantitative and qualitative scores as EID at significantly lower radiation doses. Keywords: CT, CT-Spectral, Skeletal-Axial, Spine, Hematologic Diseases, Whole-Body Imaging, Comparative Studies Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.

Recently, new dual energy (DE) computed tomography (CT) systems—dual source CT (DSCT) and photon counting CT (PCCT) have been introduced. Although these systems have the same clinical targets, they have major differences as they use dual and single kVp acquisitions and different x-ray detection and energy resolution concepts. The purpose of this study was theoretical and experimental comparisons of DSCT and PCCT. The DSCT Siemens Somatom Flash was modeled for simulation study. The PCCT had the same configuration as DSCT except it used a photon counting detector. The soft tissue phantoms with 20, 30, and 38 cm diameters included iodine, CaCO3, adipose, and water samples. The dose (air kerma) was 14 mGy for all studies. The low and high energy CT data were simulated at 80 kVp and 140 kVp for DSCT, and in 20–58 keV and 59–120 keV energy ranges for PCCT, respectively. The experiments used Somatom Flash DSCT system and PCCT system based on photon counting CdZnTe detector with 2 × 256 pixel configuration and 1 × 1 mm2 pixels size. In simulated general CT images, PCCT provided higher contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) than DSCT with 0.4/0.8 mm Sn filters. The PCCT with K-edge filter provided higher CNR than the PCCT with a Cu filter, and DSCT with 0.4 mm Sn filter provided higher CNR than the DSCT with a 0.8 mm Sn filter. In simulated DE subtracted images, CNR of the DSCT was comparable to the PCCT with a Cu filter. However, DE PCCT with Ho a K-edge filter provided 30–40% higher CNR than the DE DSCT with 0.4/0.8 mm Sn filters. The experimental PCCT provided higher CNR in general imaging compared to the DSCT. In experimental DE subtracted images, the DSCT provided higher CNR than the PCCT with a Cu filter. However, experimental CNR with DE PCCT with K-edge filter was 15% higher than in DE DSCT, which is less than 30–40% increase predicted by the simulation study. It is concluded that ideal PCCT can provide substantial advantages over ideal DSCT in CT imaging including DE subtracted CT. However, the limitations of the PCCT detector does not allow it to reach its full potential and therefore further efforts are needed to improve PCCT detectors.

To compare the potential of various bone evaluations by considering photon-counting CT (PCCT) and multiple energy-integrating-detector CT (EIDCT), including three dual-energy CT (DECT) scanners with standardized various parameters in both standard resolution (STD) and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) modes. Four cadaveric forearms were scanned using PCCT and five EIDCTs, by applying STD and UHR modes. Visibility of bone architecture, image quality, and a non-displaced fracture were subjectively scored against a reference EIDCT image by using a five-point scale. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also compared. To assess metal artifacts, a forearm with radial plate fixation was scanned by with and without Tin filter (Sn+ and Sn-), and virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) at 120 keV was created. Regarding Sn+ and VMI, images were only obtained from the technically available scanners. Subjective scores and the areas of streak artifacts were compared. PCCT demonstrated significantly lower noise (p < 0.001) and higher bone SNR and CNR (p < 0.001) than all EIDCTs in both resolution modes. However, there was no significant difference between PCCT and EIDCTs in almost all subjective scores, regardless of scan modes, except for image quality where a significant difference was observed, compared to several EIDCTs. Metal artifact analysis revealed PCCT had larger artifact in Sn- and Sn+ (p < 0.001), but fewer in VMIs than three DECTs (p < 0.001 or 0.001). Under standardized conditions, while PCCT had almost no subjective superiority in visualizing bone structures and fracture line when compared to EIDCTs, it outperformed in quantitative analysis related to image quality, especially in lower noise and higher tissue contrast. When using PCCT to assess cases with metal implants, it may be recommended to use VMIs to minimize the possible tendency for artifact to be pronounced.

To compare photon-counting detector CT (PCCT) and energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) for abdominopelvic imaging regarding radiation dose and image quality. This prospective study enrolled 94 adults undergoing abdominopelvic CT. Objective image quality was assessed by measuring hepatic noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Two blinded radiologists independently scored subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. Radiation exposure was evaluated via CTDIvol, dose-length product (DLP), and scan length-normalized DLP (nDLP). PCCT significantly reduced radiation dose: CTDIvol by 57%, DLP by 62%, and nDLP by 57% (all P < .001). Concurrently, image quality improved:hepatic noise decreasing by 31% (P < .001), and SNR increased by 40-70% (P < .001); CNR increased 22-45% (P < .05). PCCT achieves substantial radiation dose reduction while improving objective image quality compared with EID-CT in abdominopelvic imaging. These findings support PCCT as a valuable tool for dose-optimised abdominal protocols.

BackgroundCardiovascular CT is required for planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). PurposeTo compare image quality, suitability for TAVI planning, and radiation dose of photon-counting CT (PCCT) with that of dual-source CT (DSCT). Material and MethodsRetrospective study on consecutive TAVI candidates with aortic valve stenosis who underwent contrast-enhanced aorto-ilio-femoral PCCT and/or DSCT between 01/2022–07/2023. Signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated by standardized ROI-analysis. Image quality and suitability for TAVI planning were assessed by four independent expert readers (two cardiac radiologists, two cardiologists) on a 5-point-scale. CT dose-index (CTDI) and dose-length-product (DLP) were used to calculate effective radiation dose (eRD). Results300 patients (136 female, median age: 81 years, IQR: 76-84) underwent 302 CT-examinations, with PCCT in 202, DSCT in 100; two patients underwent both. Although SNR and CNR were significantly lower in PCCT vs. DSCT-images (33.0±10.5 vs. 47.3±16.4 and 47.3±14.8 vs. 59.3±21.9, P<.001, respectively), visual image quality was higher in PCCT vs. DSCT (4.8 vs. 3.3, P <.001), with moderate overall inter-reader agreement among radiologists and among cardiologists (κ=0.60, respectively). Image quality was rated as “excellent” in 160/202 (79.2%) of PCCT vs. 5/100 (5%) of DSCT-cases. Readers found images suitable to depict the aortic valve hinge-points and to map the femoral access path in 99% of PCCT vs. 85% of DSCT (P<0.01), with suitability ranked significantly higher in PCCT vs. DSCT (4.8 vs. 3.3, P<.001). Mean CTDI and DLP, and thus eRD, were significantly lower for PCCT vs. DSCT (22.4 vs. 62.9; 519.4 vs. 895.5, and 8.8 ± 4.5 mSv vs. 15.3 ± 5.8 mSv; all P<.001). ConclusionPCCT improves image quality, effectively avoids non-diagnostic CT-imaging for TAVI planning, and is associated with a lower radiation dose compared with state-of-the-art DSCT. Radiologists and cardiologists found PCCT images more suitable for TAVI planning.

BackgroundWith the emergence of photon-counting CT, ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) imaging can be performed without dose penalty. This study aims to directly compare the image quality of UHR and standard resolution (SR) scan mode in femoral artery angiographies.MethodsAfter establishing continuous extracorporeal perfusion in four fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens, photon-counting CT angiographies were performed with a radiation dose of 5 mGy and tube voltage of 120 kV in both SR and UHR mode. Images were reconstructed with dedicated convolution kernels (soft: Body-vascular (Bv)48; sharp: Bv60; ultrasharp: Bv76). Six radiologists evaluated the image quality by means of a pairwise forced-choice comparison tool. Kendall’s concordance coefficient (W) was calculated to quantify interrater agreement. Image quality was further assessed by measuring intraluminal attenuation and image noise as well as by calculating signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR).ResultsUHR yielded lower noise than SR for identical reconstructions with kernels ≥ Bv60 (p < 0.001). UHR scans exhibited lower intraluminal attenuation compared to SR (Bv60: 406.4 ± 25.1 versus 418.1 ± 30.1 HU; p < 0.001). Irrespective of scan mode, SNR and CNR decreased while noise increased with sharper kernels but UHR scans were objectively superior to SR nonetheless (Bv60: SNR 25.9 ± 6.4 versus 20.9 ± 5.3; CNR 22.7 ± 5.8 versus 18.4 ± 4.8; p < 0.001). Notably, UHR scans were preferred in subjective assessment when images were reconstructed with the ultrasharp Bv76 kernel, whereas SR was rated superior for Bv60. Interrater agreement was high (W = 0.935).ConclusionsCombinations of UHR scan mode and ultrasharp convolution kernel are able to exploit the full image quality potential in photon-counting CT angiography of the femoral arteries.Relevance statementThe UHR scan mode offers improved image quality and may increase diagnostic accuracy in CT angiography of the peripheral arterial runoff when optimized reconstruction parameters are chosen.Key points• UHR photon-counting CT improves image quality in combination with ultrasharp convolution kernels.• UHR datasets display lower image noise compared with identically reconstructed standard resolution scans.• Scans in UHR mode show decreased intraluminal attenuation compared with standard resolution imaging.Graphical

Potential of employing a quantum iterative reconstruction algorithm for ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT of the hip

To investigate the objective performance and subjective image quality of lower extremity CT angiography (CTA) in peripheral artery disease (PAD) through comparison of the first-generation photon-counting CT (PCCT) technology and the third-generation dual source energy-integrating detector CT (DECT) technology. Patients who underwent a CTA either on a PCCT or on a DECT were included in this retrospective analysis. All included patients received a digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as reference standard for stenosis grading. Virtual monoenergetic image data sets were reconstructed at 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 keV. The noise, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of vascular structures, as well as the subjective image quality using a standardized 5-point Likert Scale, were determined. Finally, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the stenotic disease detection for either technology (DECT and PCCT) were analyzed. PCCT angiography was performed in 50 PAD patients (31 males, mean age 76.16 ± 10.26), and DECT angiography was pursued in 50 PAD patients as well (29 males, mean age 74.0 ± 14.26). PCCT reached significantly higher CNR compared with DECT in all assessed arterial territories [eg, 27.84 (IQR: 22.57 to 34.66) vs 17.25 (IQR: 12.12 to 23.71), at the iliac arterial vasculature at 40 keV, P < 0.001]. Image quality and contrast were rated significantly higher for PCCT compared with DECT [eg, mean vessel contrast 5 (IQR: 4 to 5) vs 4 (IQR: 4 to 4)], at the calf arterial vasculature at 40 keV, P <0.001. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for PCCT were 96%, 97%, and 97%, respectively, in comparison to 93%, 96%, and 94%, respectively, for DECT image data sets at 55 keV. PCCT offers superior objective performance and better subjective image quality compared with DECT. Hence, PCCT angiography is improving cross-sectional PAD imaging.

Dose optimization for pediatric chest CT: a comparative study of energy-integrating and photon-counting detector CT using 70kV and 100kV protocols with tin filtration regarding image quality and dose exposure.