Abstract

493 Background: "Deepness of response" (DpR) is a new efficacy outcome measure that could explain the impact of tumor shrinkage on long-term survival outcome. In FIRE-3 trial, OS was significantly longer in patients (pts) treated with FOLFIR plus cetuximab compared with pts who received FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. One reason was that first-line treatment with Cetximab have a DpR, so it takes a lot of time to grow tumors. The aim of the present analysis was to evaluate OS, PFS, pathological grade and DpR for pts with mCRC treated with anti EGFR antibody+FOLFOX or FOLFIRI. Methods: A total of 100 pts with histopathologically confirmed mCRC treated with first-line chemotherapy in combination with anti-EGFR antibody and second-line chemotherapy with cetximab were enrolled between October 2008 and June 2013. First, we compare DpR for pts with first-line chemotherapy+anti EGFR antibody and second-line chemotherapy+cetximab. Second, we analyzed DpR and pathological grade for 32 pts performed conversion surgery. Third, we compare OS, PFS and DpR for 43 pts treaded with second-line chemotherapy+Cetximab. Results: The 38 (26) pts treated with FOLFOX+cetximab (panitumumab) had a mean DpR of 44.9 (51.4)% (Interquartile range [IR]:36.6 (39.8)%, 60.97 (64.65)%), minimum DpR -45.2 (0)%. The 43 pts treated with second-line FOLFIRI + Cetximab had a mean DpR of 10% (IR:-7.8%, 30.9%) and a minimum DpR of -158%. The DpR wans’t different between first-line FOLFOX+cetximab and panitumumab. But the DpR was significantly different between first-line FOLFOX+cetximab and second-line FOLFIRI+cetximab. Tumor regression grades 0 after preoperative. FOLFOX+cetximab (panitumumab) had a mean DpR of 61.3 (0)%, grade 1 had a mean DpR of 50.83 (56.14)%, grade 2 had a mean DpR of 54.91 (40.5)% and grade 3 had a mean DpR of 58.5 (76)%. Individual DpR of the pts treated with FOLFIRI+cetximab is a significant prognostic factor for survival time (OS and PFS) in the Longest diameter-based models (PFS:p=0.006 OS:p=0.01). Conclusions: Our results emphasize the value of the variable DpR as a new efficacy outcome measure and the DpR was shown to be associated with its ability to prolong OS and PFS.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.