Abstract
Recent performance breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), especially advances in deep learning, the availability of powerful and easy-to-use ML libraries (e.g., scikit-learn, TensorFlow, PyTorch), and increasing computational power, have led to unprecedented interest in AI/ML among nuclear engineers. For physics-based computational models, verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification (VVUQ) processes have been very widely investigated, and many methodologies have been developed. However, VVUQ of ML models has been relatively less studied, especially in nuclear engineering. This work focuses on uncertainty quantification (UQ) of ML models as a preliminary step of ML VVUQ, more specifically Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) because they are the most widely used supervised ML algorithm for both regression and classification tasks. This work aims at quantifying the prediction or approximation uncertainties of DNNs when they are used as surrogate models for expensive physical models. Three techniques for UQ of DNNs are compared, namely, Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD), Deep Ensembles (DE), and Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs). Two nuclear engineering examples are used to benchmark these methods: (1) time-dependent fission gas release data using the Bison code and (2) void fraction simulation based on the Boiling Water Reactor Full-size Fine-Mesh Bundle Tests (BFBT) benchmark using the TRACE code. It is found that the three methods typically require different DNN architectures and hyperparameters to optimize their performance. The UQ results also depend on the amount of training data available and the nature of the data. Overall, all three methods can provide reasonable estimations of the approximation uncertainties. The uncertainties are generally smaller when the mean predictions are close to the test data while the BNN methods usually produce larger uncertainties than MCD and DE.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Monte Carlo Dropout
Nuclear Engineering
Breakthroughs In Artificial Intelligence
Deep Ensembles
Machine Learning
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
Jul 23, 2021
Dec 20, 2021
Scientific Reports
Sep 30, 2022
Jul 1, 2022
Journal of Computational Science
Mar 1, 2023
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Mar 1, 2023
Neural Computing and Applications
Aug 19, 2023
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Jul 1, 2022
IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence
Feb 1, 2022
Machine Learning: Science and Technology
May 3, 2023
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Aug 1, 2021
Feb 1, 2021
International Journal of Energy Research
Sep 6, 2023
Dec 1, 2018
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Nov 19, 2023
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Nov 17, 2023
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Nov 17, 2023
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Nov 16, 2023
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Nov 2, 2023
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Oct 28, 2023
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Oct 23, 2023
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Oct 22, 2023
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Oct 21, 2023
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Oct 16, 2023