Quality of Life Survey of Urinary Diversion Patients: Comparison of Ileal Conduits versus Continent Kock Ileal Reservoirs

Abstract

There has been a recent marked increase in interest in continent urinary diversions. While considerable time has been spent on the technical aspects of these diversions the psychological impact has not yet been fully explored. We describe an extensive survey that was conducted among 100 consecutive adults (87 respondents) who had undergone urinary diversion via an ileal conduit and 100 consecutive adults (85 respondents) in whom a continent Kock ileal reservoir was created during the last 3 to 5 years at our university by the same surgeons. The Kock pouch patients were stratified further into 63 with primary diversion and 22 who underwent conversion from previous conduit diversions. The survey consisted of a questionnaire that included a social and sexual survey, the Beck Depressive Inventory, the Profile of Mood States and a physical impact study. The results revealed that all patients surveyed generally were satisfied with the diversions and they had adapted reasonably socially, physically and psychologically. The key to adaptation seemed to be a detailed, realistic preoperative education about the type of diversion used. Patients with ileal conduit diversions had the lowest expectations of the form of diversion as defined by the preoperative awareness of the need to wear an external ostomy appliance with its associated inconveniences and change in the external body image. Postoperatively, ileal conduit patients also had the poorest self images as defined by a decrease in sexual desire and in all forms of physical contact (sexual and nonsexual). The subset of patients who underwent conversion from conduit diversions to Kock pouches, however, were statistically the most satisfied, and they were the most physically and sexually active. We conclude that the Kock continent urostomy offers an important alternative to noncontinent forms of diversion.