Abstract

Housing with care has become increasingly popular in recent years, and has been viewed by policy-makers and commissioners as offering a more enabling, homely and cost effective alternative to care homes. However, most residents enter with fewer care needs than those admitted to care homes, and with different expectations. Although a previous study (Baumker et al., 2011) compared the functional outcomes for matched groups of residents, most comparative studies have used unmatched groups. This paper will compare the social care related quality of life (SCRQoL) obtained using the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) for residents in housing with care and those receiving home care. The housing with care residents were drawn from the ASSET (Adult Social Services Environments and Settings) project, which was commissioned and funded by the Department of Health’s NIHR School for Social Care Research. The home care recipients were drawn from the OSCA (Outcomes for Social Care for Adults) project. Matched groups of 124 individuals in each were created using propensity score matching. Residents in housing with care had less unmet need (current SCRQoL) than people receiving home care (p<0.0001); similar expected SCRQoL in the absence of social services (p>0.05); and a higher gain (current compared with expected) (p<0.0001). The improvements in outcomes were achieved without increased costs in providing personal care. Housing with care is relatively scarce, but this study adds further evidence for the value of developing more specialized housing and increasing the choice available to older people wishing to move from unsuitable accommodation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.