Abstract

Published data on quality of care indicators from various countries indicate the challenges of providing high-quality diabetes care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of care provided to members of the Canadian Forces (CF) who have diabetes, by determining the extent to which healthcare providers adhere to recommendations outlined in the 2008 Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) clinical practice guidelines. All 14 CF bases meeting eligibility criteria were included in the evaluation. Cases of diabetes were ascertained based on laboratory criteria. Adherence to 21 CDA guideline recommendations was evaluated following a review of patient medical records. The CF demonstrated high adherence (>75%) with 9 recommendations, moderate adherence (50% to 75%) with 7 recommendations and low adherence (<50%) with 5 recommendations. Most notably, there were 4 recommendations for which adherence was greater than 90%. The mean rate of adherence with all applicable recommendations per patient was 60.3% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 59.0% to 61.6%). CF adherence rates were generally similar to or better than comparable rates in the civilian population within Canada and other industrialized countries. It is unclear what accounts for the favourable quality of diabetes care in the CF Health Services, but this highly structured practice setting has a number of features that distinguish it from provincial healthcare systems. Several strategies can be considered to improve diabetes care even further, including providing feedback to physicians about their performance, promoting the use of diabetes care flow sheets and creating a diabetes registry.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.