Abstract
Evaluations of environmental impact assessment (EIA) experiences are often anecdotal, raising the issue of generalizing beyond unique local conditions. A cross section of ten EIA reports is systematically reviewed in an effort to address this concern. The analysis is first placed in context with an overview of concepts and frameworks for assessing EIA quality and effectiveness. After presenting the study methodology, the ten EIAs are subjected to both a screening and a performance analysis. Examples of recurrent problem areas identified include: overall study design; the generation and evaluation of alternatives; the consideration of impact significance; uncertainty; cumulative effects potential and sustainability; and impact management integration and implementation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
