Abstract

The application of criminal removal is a very important matter in the judgment . When consideration of improper judgment errors will obscure the essence of judicial and criminal law purposes . The purpose of this research is to analyze the application of criminal removal reasons based on Article 44 of the Criminal Code on judges' consideration in breaking free from all lawsuits against perpetrators of domestic violence that led to the death of Decision No. 16 / PID.B / 2011 / PN.BLK and also analyzing the suitability Consideration of the judge on the decision of the case with the purpose of criminal law . This research was conducted normatively and obtained the result that the Panel of Judges in breaking out of all lawsuits against perpetrators of domestic violence that led to death in the case Number 16 / PID.B / 2011 / PN.BLK using expert information that is psychiatrist as the only The basis for determining criminal responsibility or known by biological methods. Decision Number 16 / PID.B / 2011 / PN.BLK has been in accordance with the purpose of criminal law, one of which is achieved legal certainty, especially for the perpetrator. Â Key words : Decision, Out of all lawsuits, Article 44 of the Criminal Code.

Highlights

  • Penerapan alasan penghapus pidana merupakan suatu hal yang sangat penting dalam penjatuhan putusan

  • The purpose of this research is to analyze the application of criminal removal reasons based on

  • free from all lawsuits against perpetrators of domestic violence that led to the death of Decision No. 16

Read more

Summary

METODE PENELITIAN

Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah metode pendekatan hukum normatif/doktrinal, menggunakan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif yaitu suatu penelitian yang menggambarkan keadaan obyek yang akan diteliti.[6] Sumber data yang dipergunakan adalah sumber data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum. Sekunder.[7] Bahan Hukum Primer berupa peraturan perundangundangan, yang digunakan adalah. Sedangkan bahan hukum sekunder berupa hasil karya dari kalangan hukum dalam bentuk buku-buku atau artikel. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah dengan studi kepustakaan atau studi dokumen. Kemudian disajikan dalam bentuk uraian teks naratif yang disusun secara sistematis. Selanjutnya dianalisis dengan metode kualitatif, yaitu menguraikan data secara bermutu, dalam bentuk kalimat yang teratur, runtun, logis, tidak tumpang tindih dan efektif, dan kemudian dilakukan pembahasan

PEMBAHASAN
23 Tahun 2002 Tentang
27 Tahun 1983 Tentang
Kesesuaian
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.