Abstract

In a bifurcated U.S. food market, where one market is largely controlled by national brands and global corporations alongside an expanding alter­nate market of hyper-local direct sales, midscale producers and processors are struggling to persist. One emerging strategy for rebuilding this middle of the food system—food hubs—has gained attention as a model that could rebuild local food economies and equitable food access. Through an examination of Michigan food hubs, we ask about the extent to which and under what conditions food hubs can operationalize dual economic and social goals. We found many innovations and efforts to address food access in low-income communities—espe­cially among food hubs that were nonprofits, had been operating for less time, and were more dependent on external revenue—but their impact tended to be small-scale and uncertain. Most food hubs want to do more, but our study suggests they may not be able to until they can figuratively “put on their own mask before helping others.” That is, food hubs may be one means of increasing afford­able, healthy food access in certain scenarios, but equitable food access may be an unrealistic and unsustainable goal unless they can ensure their own financial stability. Among other options for satis­fying the requirements for equitable food access, financial survival, and returns to the farm gate, our findings suggest that food hubs attempting to reduce food access inequities may need to be subsidized as a public good, unless and until the public sector commits to a more comprehensive strategy to address food system failures. See the press release for this article.

Highlights

  • The U.S food market has increasingly come to resemble two systems: the mainstream market controlled by national brands and globally focused corporations, and an expanding alternate market of hyper-local direct sales

  • Food hub managers and their partners are still hopeful that a number of pathways exist for supporting food hubs to simultaneously improve equitable food access, their own financial survival, and returns to the farm gate

  • Food hubs in our study have been in operation for only 3 years on average, compared to the national average of 9 years (Colasanti et al, 2018), this varied considerably based on the legal model, with mixed models in operation for 1.5 years, nonprofits for 2.2 years, and for-profits for 6.7 years

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The U.S food market has increasingly come to resemble two systems: the mainstream market controlled by national brands and globally focused corporations, and an expanding alternate market of hyper-local direct sales. This bifurcation is tied to a gradual loss of structural diversity in the food system, in midscale regional production and processing, which is seen as key to scaling up more sustainable, economically viable, and socially equitable food businesses (Stahlbrand, 2017; Stevenson, Clancy, King, Lev, Ostrom, & Smith, 2011). While research is mounting to show how food hubs are creating jobs, offering fair prices to farmers, and sparking wider economic development (Colasanti, Hardy, Farbman, Pirog, Fisk, & Hamm, 2018; Jablonkski et al, 2016), evidence about food hubs’ contributions to affordable, local food access is both understudied and inconclusive (Berti & Mulligan, 2016)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.