Abstract

AbstractBACKGROUNDLaparoscopic donation has become the most common technique for living donor kidney transplantation. Despite claims of greater patient acceptance, Significant increases in living donation, relative to the waiting list, have not been realized. Defining laparoscopic donors′ long‐term psychosocial impressions may allow for strategies to increase rates of living donation.METHODSThe study method was a retrospective telephone survey inquiring into pre‐donation perceptions, hospital experiences, and post‐donation psychosocial issues.RESULTSEighty‐one patients who had undergone laparoscopic donation with at least a 1‐year follow‐up were interviewed. Twenty‐one percent first heard about this procedure from sources other than healthcare workers or their recipients. Overall, 99% believed they were adequately informed, and 35% reported pre‐operative testing was difficult. Seventy‐four percent of patients reported a positive impression of the hospital stay, although 52% reported more post‐operative pain then expected. Sixty‐one percent of patients returned to work within a month. Nine percent reported financial burden, and 6% reported difficulties with insurance. Eighty‐four percent believed the recipient had a good outcome. Ninety‐four percent would donate again if possible.CONCLUSIONThis study confi rms that long‐term donor perceptions of laparoscopic nephrectomy remain favorable. Most donors are knowledgeable about this procedure, but perceptions may be erratic because of varied sources. Early contact with the transplant team is essential in providing an educational and streamlined experience to the laparoscopic donor in renal transplant.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.