Psychometric Evaluation of the English Language Version of the Instagram Addiction Scale-15 Among English-Speaking Indian Adults.

This study aimed to translate and validate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Philippines Sunlight Exposure Questionnaire. A total of 392 Chinese individuals aged at least 18 years, residing in various cities in Sichuan province for at least 1 year, were recruited. The reliability of the Chinese version of the questionnaire was measured through internal consistency, split-half reliability, and retest reliability, while validity was determined using the content validity index and the structure validity index. The Chinese version of the Sunlight Exposure Questionnaire, which includes 19 items covering 5 factors, demonstrated McDonald's omega coefficient of 0.788. The split-half reliability of the questionnaire was 0.823, and the retest reliability was 0.940. The content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.952. The five-factor structure, supported by eigenvalues, explained 66.2% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated favorable model fit. The chi-square value degrees of freedom ratio (χ2/df) = 1.852, the goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = 0.938, the normed fit index (NFI) = 0.922, the incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.962, the comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.962, the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.952, and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.047. The indicators of the fit of the model were within reasonable bounds. The Chinese version of the Sunlight Exposure Questionnaire shows validity and good reliability for assessing sun exposure among adults in a Chinese cultural context.

Introduction Despite being one of the most effective methods of preventing the spread of communicable diseases1, vaccination has been subjected to criticism. Several scales have been formulated that were used to document attitudes towards vaccination. However, they either focus on parental attitudes towards children’s vaccinations or are targeted towards an individual’s attitude towards a specific vaccine. A scale that could document an individual’s attitude about vaccinations in general was developed by Martin and Petrie2. Aim The study aimed to translate and validate an Urdu version of the Vaccine Attitude Examination (VAX) scale in a selected Pakistani sample. Methods A cross sectional study was conducted for a month (Sept. 2021) in an outpatient department of a healthcare facility in Karachi, Pakistan. All adult men and women, as well as their caregivers (≥ 18 years), who visited the clinic, spoke Urdu as their first language, and were eligible for COVID-19 vaccine were invited. Convenience sampling method was selected, and sample size calculation was based on an item response ratio of 1:20. An Urdu version of the VAX scale was developed. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS version 23. The reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The model fitness was evaluated through IBM AMOS version 25. It done carried out using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reporting of fit indices, namely goodness of fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI), Tucker Lewis index (TLI), comparative fit index (CFI), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). The scale was considered as reliable if Cronbach’s (α) was >0.7. Model fitness was considered acceptable if most fit indices were in acceptable ranges3, i.e., GFI, TLI, CFI > 0.9 and RMSEA < 0.6, as well as p value < 0.05. This study was granted ethical clearance by the Institutional Review Board of Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi, Pakistan (Reference# THI/IRB/FQ/22-09-21/017). Results A total of 211 responses were analysed. The reliability of the scale, i.e., Cronbach’s alpha value was 0.821, and remained the same, i.e., > 0.8 during item deletion. CFA using a 4-factor model revealed the following values for fit indices; GFI = 0.944, TLI = 0.953, CFI = 0.966, and RMSEA = 0.051 (p value = 0.008). Discussion/Conclusion Although a very small scale study, the findings suggest that the Urdu version of VAX scale is reliable and a valid instrument for use in an Urdu speaking population. The scale showed good internal consistency and acceptable model fitness. The use of convenience sampling and being conducted at a single site may affect the generalisability of the results. However, this was the first time the VAX Urdu version was made available for an Urdu speaking population. It is hoped that the attitudes toward vaccines that are measured by the Urdu VAX will provide valuable information as public health officials and others work to improve vaccine uptake. Availability of the Urdu version will enable clinicians to assess the Urdu speaking persons’ attitude towards general vaccination including COVID-19 vaccination.

To examine the psychometric properties of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale (MCSRS), previously translated and adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. A methodological and cross-sectional study with data collected at a low-risk maternity hospital, period of 2017 and 2018. The inclusion criteria were early postpartum, maternal age between 18 and 34 years, birth of a live infant, and birth over 36 weeks' gestation. The Brazilian Portuguese version of the MCSRS with 34 items in six subscales (self, partner, baby, nurse, physicians, and overall childbirth satisfaction) was administered in a face-to-face interview. Psychometric analyses assessed internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) examined dimensionality. The population included 411 participants. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated a good fitness for the model, comparative fit index (CFI) and goodness-of-fit index (GFI)=0.99; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) (0.07; 95% CI 0.07-0.08); incremental fit index (IFI) and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI)=0.99, which confirmed the six subscales identified in the original scale. The factorial loads of the items were all above 0.70. For the questionnaire's overall reliability, Cronbach's alpha was 0.96 and McDonald's omega was 0.97. The MCSRS is a valid instrument, being that all subscales had good reliability indexes. CFA inclusion criteria also encompassed women who underwent an unplanned cesarean section, thus extending the use of the MCSRS.

BackgroundFew validated brief scales are available to measure constructs that may hinder mpox-related prevention and care engagement, such as knowledge and stigma. Both are highly salient barriers to infectious disease care and disease understanding, precursors to evaluating one’s risk and need to, for example, accept vaccination. To address this gap, we developed and validated the Mpox Stigma Scale (MSS) and Mpox Knowledge Scale (MKS).MethodsAs part of a full-scale clinical trial, we offered an optional mpox survey to participants who self-identified as African American or Black, were 18–29 years old, and lived in Alabama, Georgia, or North Carolina (2023, N = 330). We calculated psychometric properties through confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and applied Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Goodness of Fit Index (GFI), and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) values equal to or exceeding 0.90 and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) values less than 0.08 to determine adequate model fit. We computed internal reliability using Cronbach’s alpha and calculated Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients between the MSS and MKS and related variables.ResultsFor the MSS, CFA results showed that the one-factor model fit the data well (χ2(df = 5, N = 330) = 34.962, CFI = 0.97, GFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.13, SRMR = 0.03). For the MKS, the one-factor model provided a good fit to the data (χ2(df = 6, N = 330) = 8.44, CFI = 0.99, GFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.15, SRMR = 0.02). Cronbach’s alphas were MSS = 0.91 and MKS = 0.83, suggesting good to excellent reliability. The MSS was correlated with the MKS (r = .55, p < .001), stigmatizing attitudes (r = .24, p < .001), attitudes towards mpox vaccination (r=-.12, p = .030), and worry about contracting mpox (r = .44, p < .001). The MKS was correlated with worry about contracting mpox (r = .30, p < .001) and mpox disclosure (r=-.16, p = .003).ConclusionsThe MSS and MKS are reliable and valid tools for public health practice, treatment and prevention research, and behavioral science. Further validation is warranted across populations and geographic locations.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05490329.

Martin and Petrie developed the Vaccine Attitudes Examination (VAX) scale with an aim to document general vaccination attitudes. Vaccine acceptance plays an important role in curbing COVID-19 infections. Thus, it was important to assess vaccination attitudes of Pakistani people towards novel COVID-19 vaccines. The VAX scale was not available in Urdu language for Pakistani population. The study aimed to carry out cross-cultural adaptation and validation of an Urdu version of the Vaccine Attitude Examination (VAX) scale in a selected population sample from Pakistan. A cross sectional study was conducted in September 2021 in an outpatient department of a healthcare facility in Karachi, Pakistan. Adult visitors, eligible for COVID-19 vaccine and spoke Urdu as first language were invited. Convenient sampling was used, and sample size was based on an item response ratio of 1:20. An Urdu version of the VAX scale was developed. The reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The model fitness was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and fit indices namely goodness of fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI), Tucker Lewis index (TLI), comparative fit index (CFI), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). A structural equation model (SEM) was also developed. IBM SPSS and AMOS were used to analyse the data. The study had ethical clearance. A total of 211 responses were analysed. The reliability (Cronbach's α) was 0.821. The ICC was 0.831 (95% CI: 0.795-0.863). CFA using a 4-factor model revealed the following values for fit indices; GFI = 0.944, AGFI = 0.909, TLI = 0.953, CFI = 0.966, and RMSEA = 0.051. All values reported were in the acceptable range. The VAX Urdu version is a reliable and valid instrument for use in an Urdu speaking population and will enable clinicians to assess the public's attitude towards general vaccination including COVID-19 vaccination. Clinicians can use the VAX-U to document a person's vaccine hesitancy and tailor their counselling to address the issues in vaccine uptake.

Background: Medication adherence is a major challenge for patients with diabetes. Adherence rates are often low, and this can lead to poor glycaemic control and increased risk of complications. There are a number of tools available to measure medication adherence, but few have been validated in Arabic-speaking populations.Aim: This study aimed to validate the Arabic version of the General Medication Adherence Scale in patients with type 2 diabetes in Jordan.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted for 3 months among patients attending diabetes mellitus outpatient clinic in Irbid, Jordan. The validation procedure included confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and equation modelling (SEM). Fit indices, namely, goodness of fit index (GFI), Tucker Lewis index (TLI), comparative fit index (CFI), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) were observed. Corrected item-total correlation (ITC) was reported. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha (α) and α value based on item deletion was also carried out. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was reported. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS v23 and IBM AMOS v25.Results: Data from 119 participants were gathered. The mean adherence score was 27.5 (±6) ranging from 6 to 33. More than half of the patients were adherent to their therapy (n = 79, 66.4%). The reliability of the scale (n = 11) was 0.907, and ICC ranged from 0.880—0.930: 95% CI. The following values were observed in CFA; χ2 = 62.158, df = 41, χ2/df = 1.516, GFI = 0.913, AGFI = 0.860, TLI = 0.960, CFI = 0.971 and RMSEA = 0.066. A total of 10 out of 11 items had corrected ITC >0.5. The α remained between 0.89–0.92 during item deletion.Conclusion: The results obtained in this study suggest that the scale is valid and reliable in measuring adherence to medications in the studied sample of patients with diabetes. This scale can be used by clinicians in Jordan to assess adherence and may further aide in evaluating interventions to improve adherence rates in persons with type 2 diabetes.

Background: There is no medication adherence scale available in Sindhi language currently. Hence, the Sindhi speaking population will either use a translator or provide their medical history in another language for documentation of medical conditions. This poses a challenge in monitoring and evaluating adherence to medications within this linguistic community.Aim: The aim of this study was to translate and validate the Sindhi version of the General Medication Adherence Scale (GMAS-S) in patients with chronic diseases.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 4 months duration and was conducted in out-patient department of a university affiliated hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. All adults with chronic diseases, who were on long-term medications, and able to read and understand Sindhi language were invited. Convenience sampling was employed and a questionnaire consisting of demographic questions and the Sindhi version of GMAS was used. The translation of the scale was carried out. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted, and a structural equation model (SEM) was developed. Fit indices, namely, goodness of fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI), Tucker Lewis index (TLI), comparative fit index (CFI), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) were reported. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha (α), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), corrected item-to-total correlation (ITC) and item deletion. Data were analysed through IBM SPSS version 23 and IBM AMOS version 25. The study obtained ethical clearance.Results: A total of 150 responses were analysed. The reliability of the Sindhi version of GMAS was (α) = 0.696. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was reported at 0.696 (95% CI: 0.618–0.763). The values for the fit indices were as follows: χ2/df = 1.84, GFI = 0.918, TLI = 0.920, CFI = 0.942, AGFI = 0.864, and RMSEA = 0.075. All values except AGFI were in the acceptable ranges and indicated good fitness. Most participants (80.7%) appeared non-adherent to their medications.Conclusion: The results of the study demonstrate that the Sindhi version of the GMAS is a valid and reliable scale to measure adherence in Sindhi speaking persons with chronic diseases.

Background Academic commitment as a new specialized issue has attracted the attention of educational researchers. Despite of the conducting relevant studies, it was more considered by Human-Vogel and Rabe. Their designed research tool has not yet been used in Iran. Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the factor structure and reliability of this tool in Iranian learners. Methods The primary tool consisted of 30 items and 5 dimensions (students’ satisfaction with their studies, level of commitment, investment, quality of alternatives, and meaningfulness). In this cross-sectional study, 449 pre-university students of Bandar Abbas city were selected through multi-stage sampling. Data were analyzed using AMOS and SPSS software. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine factor structure. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and Gottman and Spearman-Brown split-half coefficients, were used to test the reliability. Results After examination the validity of the tool, five items were excluded and finally a questionnaire including 25 questions was obtained. Beta coefficients were greater than 0.4. Model fit indices, including root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), Comparative fit index (CFI), goodness of fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI), normed fit index (NFI), incremental fit index (IFI), and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) were obtained 0.04, 0.95, 0.91, 0.90, 0.90, 0.95, and 0.94, respectively, indicating the fitness of this five-factor tool. A Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.87, a Gottman’s split-half of 0.65, and a Spearman-Brown split-half of 0.68 were obtained, indicating the appropriate reliability of the instrument. Conclusions Based on the results, the final version of the tool seems to be suitable for assessing academic commitment in Iranian learners in the Iran educational systems.

Purpose: Employee Engagement is mainstream attention for organizations in the current business scenario. The purpose of the current research focused on analysing the relationship between HRM Practices and Employee Engagement considering employees working in various IT industries, especially considering employees working in HR Department. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research was cross-sectional in nature and survey method was employed to collect the data. Exploratory Factor Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Modelling were used to analyse the hypothesis. Data was collected among 345 employees employed in the HR department of various private sector organizations. Results: The model fit indices were adequate and acceptable. The model fit indices obtained were: CMIN/DF = 2.909; Goodness of Fit index (GFI) = 0.945; adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) = 0.909; incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.976; Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.981; comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.966; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.06. Findings: The results of the study disclose that HRM practices and Employee Engagement were related to each other. HRM practices in organizations empowered employees and made them more engaged to perform better in their job roles. The study results imply that HRM practices need to be considered as priority in business organizations for the long term success. Research Limitations: Non probabilistic sample method was adopted and it was possible to gather data only from 345 employees working in the HR Department of various private sector organizations. Practical Implications: Business organizations are constantly working towards adopting new strategies and programs in the workplace to empower employees and keep them engaged in their work roles and responsibilities. Therefore, organizations to focus on human resource management practices and implement them effectively to make their employees committed and engaged towards their job. In this context, the present research attempts to analyse the association between human resource practices and employee engagement. The results provide insights for business managers on the importance of having effective Human Resource practices to enhance employees level of engagement towards their work roles. Originality/ Value: Current research contributes to the existing literature on Human Resource Practices and Employee Engagement. While considering the current business scenario, it becomes very important to understand the role of human resource management practices on the engagement level of employees.

There are very few studies evaluating the knowledge of dentists about infection precautions in oral radiology. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the modified form of a developed questionnaire and to apply this questionnaire to Turkish dentists. The questionnaire was applied to a sample of 250 dentists for the scale development [200 for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and 50 for control] and 173 dentists for the implementation of the scale. The scale was applied to 200 dentists and construct validity was examined with CFA. For model fit; chi square to df ratio, RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation), TLI (Tucker-Lewis Index), CFI (Comparative Fit Index), GFI (goodness of fit index), AGFI (adjusted goodness of fit index) and NFI (normed fit index) were obtained. Also, reliability analysis was applied and itemtotal correlations and Cronbach's alpha values were given. Adapted scale scores using a different sample of 173 dentists were compared according to demographic characteristics. CFA showed good fit statistics (X2/df=1.511, RMSEA=0.057, TLI=0.942, CFI=0.953, GFI=0.926, AGFI=0.900, NFI=0.928) for the scale. Item-total correlations were over 0.30 and Cronbach's alpha was calculated as 0.877. In addition, experienced dentists had higher scores in the dimension of personal hygiene (p<0.05). The Turkish version of the modified infection control questionnaire in oral radiology showed adequate psychometric properties. This indicated that it could be a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of infection control in oral radiology among Turkish dentists.

BackgroundThe quality of life (QoL) of family caregivers supporting older persons with functional dependence due to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a growing concern. Accurately assessing caregiver well-being requires culturally appropriate, valid, and reliable instruments. However, such tools remain limited in the Indonesian context.ObjectiveThis study aimed to translate the Quality of Life Index (QLI) into Indonesian and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Indonesian version (QLI-I) among family caregivers of dependent older persons with T2DM.MethodsBrislin’s back-translation method was used to ensure linguistic and conceptual equivalence in the translation process. Content validity was assessed by a panel of five experts. Psychometric evaluation was conducted on a purposive sample of 394 family caregivers recruited from eleven community health centers in Medan, Indonesia. Construct validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while convergent validity and construct reliability (CR) were analyzed to assess measurement accuracy.ResultsThe Indonesian version of the Quality of Life Index (QLI-I) demonstrated strong construct validity, with standardized factor loadings ranging from 0.707 to 0.870. CFA indicated an acceptable model fit based on the following indices: Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.067, ratio of chi-square to degrees of freedom (CMIN/df) = 2.779, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.906, Incremental Fit Index (IFI) = 0.906, Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.814, and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.898. Composite Reliability (CR) values were high across all domains: Health/Functioning (HF) = 0.957, Family (FA) = 0.876, Social/Economic (SE) = 0.924, and Psychological/Spiritual (PS) = 0.922. Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values met the recommended threshold for each domain: HF = 0.633, FA = 0.586, SE = 0.605, and PS = 0.627. All constructs demonstrated acceptable discriminant validity, confirming the distinctiveness of each domain.ConclusionThe QLI-I is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the QoL of family caregivers of dependent older persons with T2DM. Its use in clinical and community settings can support nurses and healthcare professionals in identifying caregiver needs and developing culturally appropriate, evidence-based interventions to enhance caregiver well-being.

ObjectiveThis research seeks to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for Couples (IRIC) to ensure it is culturally relevant to China, while also assessing its reliability and validity among a sample of pregnant women and their spouses.MethodsA total of 402 couples were recruited from two hospitals in Anhui Province. The English version of the IRIC was translated into Chinese in accordance with Brislin’s principles of cross-cultural translation. The reliability of the translated scale was assessed using Cronbach’s α coefficient, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability. The structural validity of the scale was examined through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale served as a criterion measure to evaluate its correlation with the IRIC. All data analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 and Mplus 8.3.ResultsThe Chinese version of the IRIC comprises two dimensions and thirteen items (seven items pertaining to empathic concern and six items related to Perspective Taking). In the sample of pregnant women, the Cronbach’s α coefficient for the Chinese version of the IRIC was 0.922, with coefficients of 0.871 for Empathic Concern and 0.909 for the Perspective Taking. The split-half reliability was 0.902 and the overall test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.996. In the sample of partners of pregnant women, the Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.938, with coefficients of 0.895 for empathic concern and 0.925 for Perspective Taking, and a split-half reliability of 0.898, while the overall test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.997. The content validity index at the scale level was 0.967, and at the item level, it ranged from 0.857 to 1.000. In the sample of pregnant women, the confirmatory factor analysis results indicated that the fit indices for the bi-factor model were satisfactory (Chi-square/degrees of freedom (chi^2/df) = 1.331, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.993, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.987, normal fit index (NFI) = 0.972, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.958, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.041, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.038). In the sample of partners, the confirmatory factor analysis results also demonstrated satisfactory fit indices for the bi-factor model (chi^2/df = 1.588, CFI = 0.989, TLI = 0.976, NFI = 0.971, GFI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.054, SRMR = 0.039). The scale successfully passed the equivalence test, with indices fitting well.ConclusionThe findings suggest that the Chinese version of the IRIC exhibits strong reliability and validity, rendering it an effective instrument for evaluating the level of empathy between pregnant women and their partners. The translated scale also facilitates the early detection of couple empathy, providing a scientific foundation for the development of early personalized intervention strategies. Overall, this scale possesses clinical relevance and practical importance in enhancing marital satisfaction. However, future research should encompass a larger and more diverse population.

BackgroundMaternal anxiety induced by neonatal jaundice has adverse effects on maternal and infant health, but there was no specific tool to identify the anxiety level of mothers. This study aims to develop a Maternal Anxiety for Neonatal Jaundice Scale (MANJS) and to validate it in the target population.MethodsAn initial 11-items MANJS was developed through literature review, expert panel consultation, and a pilot-test. Subsequently, mothers of neonates with jaundice were recruited from the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hainan Province, China, from June to December 2018, for a formal questionnaire survey. Based on the data collected, the scale was validated for construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, content validity, and internal consistency reliability after the items screening.ResultsThe reliability and validity of MANJS were validated in 1127 mothers of jaundiced neonates. After the item with cross-loadings was removed using exploratory factor analysis, MANJS consisted of two dimensions and 10 items, with a cumulative variance contribution of 74.36% and factor loadings above 0.6 for all items. The confirmatory factor analysis identified three items with cross-factor loading or error correlation and then they were removed orderly. The further confirmatory factor analysis showed a good construct validity for the 7-item MANJS, with standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.029, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.068, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.961, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.937, incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.961, normed fit index (NFI) = 0.954, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.998, adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) = 0.996, respectively. The average variance extracted values (AVE) of the two factors were 0.80 and 0.72, and the combined reliability (CR) were 0.94 and 0.88, respectively. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90 for the MANJS, and split-half reliability was 0.72.ConclusionsMANJS was demonstrated to have satisfactory reliability and validity in evaluating maternal anxiety caused by neonatal jaundice among Chinese postpartum women.

ObjectivesTo study the psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC-GE).DesignCross-sectional study.SettingThree Georgian hospitals.ParticipantsStaff of participating hospitals (n=579 responses, response rate 41.6%).Primary and...

To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the 5-item oral health impact profile (OHIP-5). According to the international guidelines, the Chinese version of the OHIP-5 was produced. It was applied to patients who visit our clinic. The reliability of the scale was evaluated by internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability. In addition, the validity of the scale was evaluated by construct validity and convergent validity. A total of 556 patients were enrolled in the study. The Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient values (ICC) of the Chinese version of the OHIP-5 were 0.868, 0.831, respectively. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the one-factor model provided an acceptable fit to the data. The fit indices were: the chi-square fit statistics/degree of freedom (χ²/df)=2.419, the goodness-of-fit index (GFI)=0.995, the adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI)= 0.960, the normed fit index (NFI)=0.996, the incremental fit index (IFI)=0.997, the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI)= 0.985, the comparative fit index (CFI)=0.997, and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.070. For the convergent validity of the scale, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.674. The Chinese version of OHIP-5 had a good reliability and validity by rigorous psychometric properties. Overall, it can be further promoted in clinical research and epidemiological investigations.