Abstract

To assess the patterns of use of Disease Modifying Treatments (DMTs) between 2012 and 2016 among Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) patients in Europe (EU). Data are from an ongoing multi-center retrospective chart-review study of RRMS patients in 5-EU (5EU: UK/Germany/France/Italy/Spain). Data on diagnosis, clinical status, and treatment patterns are collected from health care providers (HCPs) with practice duration (≥3yrs) and patient volume (≥15 MS patients/month). Each HCP collects de-identified data from next 10 consecutive MS patients within the respective study windows. RRMS patients taking injectable (INJ), ORAL, or infusible (INF) DMTs were analyzed across five time-periods since 2012: Q42012/Q42013/Q42014/Q42015/Q42016. In total, 1395(Q42012)/1465(Q42013)/1601(Q42014)/1586(Q4015)/1591(Q416) eligible RRMS patient charts were included in the analyses. Over the 2012-2016 time period, top-4 reasons for choosing DMTs were: efficacy factors (74.2%/55.6%), convenience factors (8.0%/13.6%), benefit vs risk profile (2.6%/10.5%) and patient decision (5.5%/5.9%). Overall % patients on INJ decreased from 73.5% (Q42012) to 38.8% (Q42016), and those on ORAL increased from 11.3% (Q42012) to 43.2% (Q42016). INF use showed only slight increase (14.6%/17.5% in Q42012/Q42016). Within 1st-line, changes in drug utilization from Q42012/Q42016 were: INJ:93.5%/53.5%, ORAL:2.0%/35.7%, INF:4.2%/10.3%; within 2nd-line, INJ:51.8%/23.7%, ORAL:18.9%/53.5%, INF:28.6%/22.7%; within 3rd and later lines, INJ:17.8%/9.4%, ORAL:44.1%/51.1%, INF:36.2%/37.8%. Among the overall cohort, mean EDSS scores at the time of study data collection remained stable from Q42012/Q42016 for INJ (2.08/1.99) & INF (3.63/3.26), while EDSS scores decreased for ORAL (3.18/2.16). In this study cohort, adoption of oral DMTs increased dramatically; displacing the use of injectables as preferred treatment and corresponding to a shift in prescription driver trends. Most recent EDSS scores indicated lower disease severity among users of oral DMTs, a likely consequence of their 1st line penetration. Impact of observed treatment patterns and treatment sequencing strategies on patient outcomes warrant further scrutiny.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.