Abstract
Abstract The purpose of the work is to systematize the discipline of the proof of environmental harm in inter-State litigation, examining, in light of the practice of international courts and tribunals, the following five aspects: (i) definition of the actionable ‘environmental damage’; (ii) burden of proof and presentation of evidence; (iii) means and methods of proof; (iv) standard of proof; and (v) evaluation of the damage. The analysis takes into account the most relevant case law and doctrinal studies in the field, reconstructing a general framework, whilst taking into account specificities that might derive from specific applicable regimes. The main aim of the work is to assess whether the challenges in proving environmental harm are fostering – or have already led to – the creation of a different set of applicable rules on evidence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
