Abstract

AbstractThis chapter discusses the prosperity–religion link and reviews some prominent empirical studies refuting and confirming Weber’s thesis and balancing the evidence gathered. It also emphasises the importance of seriously considering the institutional (and hegemonic) influence of religion in addition to the cultural influence (of religious adherents). The historical institutional influence of religion has been the crucial factor with regard to prosperity/transparency (more than the current proportion of adherents).The relationships of prosperity vis-à-vis religion as a predictor (independent) variable (e.g. Weber) or as a criterion (dependent) variable (e.g. Marx) reinforce each other and produced a vast body of theories and empirical studies. In the first causal arrow, Weber’s explanations and findings in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism has attracted much criticism over the last century. The debate remains polarised.The second causal arrow (religion as a dependent variable vis-à-vis prosperity) resulted in, among others, secularisation theories focusing on either the supply or demand-side of religion. The theory of existential security is an influential model that empirically focuses on the variations of the demand-side and revises the secularisation theory.

Highlights

  • In the first causal arrow, religion is a predictor variable that affects prosperity. This arrow represents a school of thought that descends from Weber (1905), with the so-called cultural argument that the beliefs of individual Protestants led to higher prosperity

  • This study argues that the institutional influence of religion has been more decisive than the “cultural path” of this causal relation

  • Religion as a Predictor (Independent) Variable that. Key issues in this interaction are how the institution of religion influences the institutions of law and state, and prosperity

Read more

Summary

Affects Prosperity

Key issues in this interaction are how the institution of religion influences the institutions of law and state, and prosperity (institutional influence of religion) (see Sect. 5.3).

Max Weber linked religion and economic performance arguing that the Protestant
Affected by Prosperity
Prosperity and Religion
Findings
Empirical Expectation

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.