Proposed changes to current definitions of ICHD-3 regarding headache and facial pain attributed to the disorder of the nose or paranasal sinuses.
BackgroundClinicians encounter difficulties in differentiating between headache/facial pain of true sinogenic origin, and clinically similar pain related to primary headache disorders, such as migraine. The International Classification of Headache Disorders and International Classification of Orofacial Pain, together with clinical definitions of acute and chronic rhinosinusitis as refined by the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps, have produced a unique opportunity to improve the current diagnostic criteria of headache/facial pain attributed to rhinosinusitis.MethodsAn international multidisciplinary panel reviewed clinical evidence regarding the overlap of primary headaches and rhinosinusitis in order to harmonize and clarify diagnostic frameworks.ResultsThe proposal integrates validated rhinologic definitions into headache and facial pain classifications. Key suggestions include the removal or adjustment of non-specific criteria (e.g., headache exacerbated by pressure applied over the paranasal sinuses) which also frequently occur in primary headache disorders. To enhance specificity, evidence-based negative predictors - such as the absence of nausea, osmophobia or photophobia and phonophobia - are introduced. Only for chronic rhinosinusitis, it has been proposed to include endoscopic or radiological evidence of inflammation, as necessary to confirm the diagnosis.ConclusionAligning ICHD-4 with contemporary rhinologic guidelines through the use of positive and negative predictors may help improve diagnostic accuracy, ensure appropriate therapy and increase the reliability of trial design.
- Discussion
4
- 10.1067/mai.2003.1568
- Jul 1, 2003
- The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Reply
- Front Matter
7
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.09.009
- Nov 8, 2005
- The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Expanding the evidence base for the medical treatment of nasal polyposis
- Research Article
140
- 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001435
- Jan 1, 2019
- Pain
This article describes chronic secondary headache and chronic orofacial pain (OFP) disorders with respect to the new International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). The section refers extensively to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) of the International Headache Society that is implemented in the chapter on Neurology in ICD-11. The ICHD-3 differentiates between primary (idiopathic) headache disorders, secondary (symptomatic) headache disorders, and OFP disorders including cranial neuralgias. Chronic headache or OFP is defined as headache or OFP that occurs on at least 50% of the days during at least 3 months and lasting at least 2 hours per day. Only chronic secondary headache and chronic secondary OFP disorders are included here; chronic primary headache or OFP disorders are listed under chronic primary pain syndromes that have been described in a companion publication. The subdivisions of chronic secondary OFP of ICHD-3 are complemented by the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders and contributions from the International Association for the Study of Pain Special Interest Group on Orofacial and Head Pain and include chronic dental pain. The ICD-11 codes described here are intended to be used in combination with codes for the underlying diseases, to identify patients who require specialized pain management. In addition, these codes shall enhance visibility of these disorders in morbidity statistics and motivate research into their mechanisms.
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.mpmed.2023.06.011
- Jul 25, 2023
- Medicine
Headache and facial pain
- Research Article
15
- 10.1016/j.jaip.2012.12.001
- Feb 6, 2013
- The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Chronic Rhinosinusitis
- Research Article
41
- 10.5664/jcsm.27392
- Feb 15, 2009
- Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
Insomnia has been identified as a risk factor for tension-type headache, although the pathogenesis of sleep disturbance in this population is unclear. The present study examined pain-related self-management strategies in a nonclinical, young-adult sample for preliminary evidence to support a novel hypothesis for the development of insomnia in this population. Self-report data on triggers of headache, pain interference with sleep, and pain-related self-management strategies were analyzed for 32 women with tension-type headache and 33 women with minimal pain who served as controls. The results revealed that a significantly greater proportion of the headache group relative to the control group reported sleep problems as a trigger of headaches, stress as a trigger of headache, and going to sleep as a coping strategy for pain. The headache group also reported significantly higher ratings of pain interference with sleep. Going to sleep was the most commonly used self-management strategy (81%) by headache sufferers and also rated as the most effective strategy (5.5 out of 7.0). These findings suggest that a bidirectional relationship between sleep disturbance and headache is present in this young-adult sample. Furthermore, the frequent use of sleep as a self-management strategy for pain is consistent with the hypothesis that sleep-seeking behavior might be a mediating factor in the development of insomnia among people with tension-type headache. This hypothesis fits within the most widely accepted conceptual model of chronic insomnia and should be further investigated in individuals with both tension-type headache and insomnia.
- Research Article
31
- 10.1007/s11916-009-0051-8
- Jul 14, 2009
- Current Pain and Headache Reports
Sinus headache is not a diagnostic term supported by the academia, yet it appears to be understood by the general public and larger medical community. It can be considered both a primary and secondary headache disorder. As a primary headache disorder, most of the patients considered to have sinus headache indeed have migraine (migraine with sinus symptoms). Yet it is also possible that some attacks of sinus headache may represent a unique clinical phenotype of migraine or be a unique clinical entity. Potentially, primary sinus headache can chronify and be refractory through immune-mediated mechanisms or as a catalyst for migraine chronification through ineffective treatment or medication overuse and misuse. As a secondary headache disorder, sinus headache can be associated with a wide range of underlying etiologies such as infection, anatomical abnormalities, trauma, and immunological disease or sleep disorders. It is possible that these underlying pathophysiological processes generate long-standing activation of nociceptive mechanisms involved in headache and can lead to chronification and refractoriness of the headache symptomatology. This article explores some of the potential mechanisms and the available scientific studies that may explain how sinus headache can become chronic and present to the clinician as a refractory headache disorder.
- Front Matter
86
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.01.024
- Mar 1, 2020
- The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
The sense of smell in chronic rhinosinusitis
- Research Article
1
- 10.22141/2224-0551.16.2.2021.229881
- Sep 10, 2021
- CHILD`S HEALTH
1
- Research Article
10
- 10.33762/bsurg.2020.167508
- Dec 31, 2020
- Basrah Journal of Surgery
Treatment of sinonasal diseases is either conservative or surgical. The recent advances in surgical management is the use of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) as it causes less morbidity, complication, pain and above all, less recurrence rates. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ESS for the treatment of nasal & paranasal sinus diseases and to address the postoperative complications. A prospective study was done at the Department of Otolaryngology in Basrah Teaching Hospital in the period from January 2016 to August 2019. One hundred twenty six patients with sinonasal diseases were involved in this study, more than this number of patients was operated upon but they either refused participation in this study or dropped from follow-up. The main indications of surgery were; chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyp (33%), chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp (28.6%), Allergic fungal sinusitis & mycetoma (17.4%), and acute recurrent sinusitis (16%). Main presenting symptoms were; nasal obstruction (85.7%), nasal discharge (69%), headache and facial pain (66.6%) and hyposmia and or anosmia (57.9%). The majority of operated upon patients were primary cases (98 patients, 77.7%), while (28 patients, 22.2%) were revision cases. The commonest causes of revision were; retained or incompletely removed uncinate process in 28.5% of cases, followed by incomplete removal or persistence of anterior ethmoid cells in 21.4% cases. In this series complications occurred in 15%, which were generally minor (9.5%), major complications occurred in 5.5% of operated upon patients. The commonest major complication is sever bleeding which was reported in 4.7% and anosmia which was reported in one patient. No CSF leak, retro orbital haemorrhage, or blindness was reported. Most of the patients in this series were improved (88.8%), complete symptom improvement occurred in (75 patients, 59.5%), partial improvement (37 patients, 29.3%), while (14 patients, 11%) were not improved. In conclusion, functional endoscopic sinus surgery is a safe surgery for sinonasal diseases, it carry good success rate with non-significant major complications. Key words: Nasal Sinus, Functional Surgery, Endoscopy
- Research Article
36
- 10.1542/pir.33-12-562
- Nov 30, 2012
- Pediatrics in Review
1. Heidi K. Blume, MD, MPH 1. Division of Pediatric Neurology, Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA. * Abbreviations: CSF: : cerebrospinal fluid ICH: : intracranial hemorrhage ICP: : intracranial pressure IIH: : idiopathic intracranial hypertension NDPH: : new daily persistent headache NSAID: : nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug SVT: : sinus venous thrombosis TAC: : trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia Headaches are common in children; while most are caused by a benign problem or primary headache disorder, headaches can be a sign of a serious underlying condition. Pediatricians must be aware of the most recent recommendations for evaluating and managing headaches. After reading this article, readers should be able to: 1. Understand the evaluation of a child who has headache. 2. Recognize the diagnostic criteria for pediatric migraine. 3. Recognize “red flags” for elevated intracranial pressure or other underlying conditions in the child who has headache. 4. Discuss treatment strategies for migraine, tension, and chronic headache disorders. Headaches are common in children and adolescents and are a frequent chief complaint in office and emergency department visits. The vast majority of childhood headaches are due to a primary headache disorder, such as migraine, or an acute, relatively benign process, such as viral infection. However, clinicians also need to consider other causes of headaches in children. Even when headaches are benign, they may cause significant dysfunction for the child and family and must be managed appropriately to minimize disability and optimize function. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology of childhood headache, evaluation of the child who has headaches, when to consider secondary headache syndromes, and the diagnosis and management of primary headache disorders such as migraine and tension-type headaches. Acute and chronic headaches are relatively common in children and adolescents, although estimates of the precise prevalence of headache and migraine vary widely. Depending on the study definition of headache, population involved, and time periods studied, 17% to 90% of children report headaches, with an overall prevalence of 58% reporting some form of headache in the past year. (1 …
- Research Article
36
- 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.1.106
- Dec 24, 2015
- Journal of Korean Medical Science
The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility and usefulness of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition, beta version (ICHD-3β), and compare the differences with the International Classification of Headache Disorders, second edition (ICHD-2). Consecutive first-visit patients were recruited from 11 headache clinics in Korea. Headache classification was performed in accordance with ICHD-3β. The characteristics of headaches were analyzed and the feasibility and usefulness of this version was assessed by the proportion of unclassified headache disorders compared with ICHD-2. A total of 1,627 patients were enrolled (mean age, 47.4±14.7 yr; 62.8% female). Classification by ICHD-3β was achieved in 97.8% of headache patients, whereas 90.0% could be classified by ICHD-2. Primary headaches (n=1,429, 87.8%) were classified as follows: 697 migraines, 445 tension-type headaches, 22 cluster headaches, and 265 other primary headache disorders. Secondary headache or painful cranial neuropathies/other facial pains were diagnosed in 163 patients (10.0%). Only 2.2% were not classified by ICHD-3β. The main reasons for missing classifications were insufficient information (1.6%) or absence of suitable classification (0.6%). The diagnoses differed from those using ICHD-2 in 243 patients (14.9%). Among them, 165 patients were newly classified from unclassified with ICHD-2 because of the relaxation of the previous strict criteria or the introduction of a new diagnostic category. ICHD-3β would yield a higher classification rate than its previous version, ICHD-2. ICHD-3β is applicable in clinical practice for first-visit headache patients of a referral hospital.
- Research Article
- 10.1055/s-0029-1216349
- Apr 23, 2009
- Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie
Chronic inflammation of nasal mucosa and sinuses are of increasing prevalence. Patients suffering from chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are characterised by nasal obstruction and secre- tion, impaired sense of smell, head and facial pain, causing impact on quality of life as well as tremendous socioeconomic effects. Therefore, effective and specific diagnostics as well as therapies are essential, which have to be selected from state of the art, evidence based guidelines. According to EP3OS guidelines from 2007 the CRS is defined as chronic inflammation of the nose and nasal sinuses, with or without nasal polyps (CRSwNP/CRSsNP). Upon shown diagnostic criteria of CRS first choice of therapy should be topical glucocorticoids causing anti-inflammatory and curative effects. Improvement of nasal symptoms can be achieved by hypertonic salt solutions. Median to severe symptoms of CRSsNP might be improved by longterm-treatment with oral macrolides. Patients suffering additionally from allergies will benefit from antihistamines, whereas those suffering from analgesic-intolerance (AI) will show improvement upon adaptive desensitisation. Leukotriene receptor antagonists, anti-IgE-antibodies (Omalizumab) or anti-interleukin-5- antibodies (Mepolizumab) are new therapeutic options for the treatment of CRS. This paper reviews recent pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapeutic options for conservative treatment of CRS. In addition, evidence based therapeutic options of CRS treatment are evaluated.
- Research Article
10
- 10.1542/peds.109.1.166
- Jan 1, 2002
- Pediatrics
The sinusitis debate.
- Research Article
93
- 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.12.1092
- Mar 15, 2014
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Basophils are elevated in nasal polyps of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without aspirin sensitivity