Abstract

Objective: The current literature on propofol infusion as a bridge to extubation in critically ill children is limited to children with burns and congenital cardiac disease. We hypothesize that propofol infusion is a feasible bridge to extubation in mechanically ventilated, critically ill children.Design: Retrospective chart review.Setting: Pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital.Patients: Children < 21 years, admitted to our Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) for at least 48 h and at least two sedative infusions and who received propofol infusion for 4 to 24 h during anticipated extubation from January 2014 to May 2017.Interventions: None.Measurements and Main Results: We assessed extubation success as primary outcome. We defined extubation success as no re-intubation within 24 h after extubation. We also assessed for occurrence of adverse effects of propofol infusion (1) hemodynamic instability [more than 10% change from pre-propofol baseline heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) measured 4 h before and during propofol infusion, need for any inotrope and/or fluid bolus] and (2) occurrence of lactic acidosis in absence of any documented sepsis. We compared hemodynamic parameters before and during infusion using Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test (significant p-value ≤ 0.05). We evaluated 35 critically ill, mechanically ventilated children. The median age, weight and duration of MV were 3.8 (IQR: 1.25–10.5) years, 12 (IQR: 6–16.2) kilograms and 111 (IQR: 78–212) h, respectively. Of the 35 patients, 15 (43%) were post-surgical (10 general and 5 cardiac) and the remaining 20 (57%) were non-surgical respiratory failure cases. The median (IQR) propofol infusion dose and duration were 64.7 (53.2-81.1) mcg/kg/min and 7.8 h respectively. Only one patient got re-intubated within 24 h of extubation and was later diagnosed with vascular ring. During propofol infusion, 7/35 (20%) patients exhibited transient drop in MAP > 10% from baseline, but none had lactic acidosis or required an inotrope or fluid bolus.Conclusions: In critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients, propofol infusion used over a short duration (<12 h) was found to be a feasible bridge to extubation. No patient had significant hypotension or lactic acidosis during the infusion.

Highlights

  • Extubation of critically ill children who have been maintained on large doses of sedatives is challenging

  • The criteria used in our study to define propofolrelated hemodynamic instability were adopted from a previous pediatric study—more than 10% increase in heart rate (HR) with more than 10% decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) as compared to pre-propofol baseline measured 4 h before and during propofol infusion and need for any inotrope and/or fluid bolus during propofol infusion [11]

  • Our findings suggest that propofol is a feasible option as a periextubation sedative agent in critically ill children supported on mechanical ventilation in general pediatric critical care unit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Extubation of critically ill children who have been maintained on large doses of sedatives is challenging. Even though propofol infusion is used as a bridge to extubation, there is a very limited data in the pediatric population regarding propofol infusion for smooth and successful extubation, especially in critically ill children supported on mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h. We performed a retrospective chart review to assess the use of propofol infusion for a successful extubation in critically ill children who required mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h in our general PICU. To our knowledge, this is the first study, which explored feasibility of propofol infusion as a bridge to successful extubation in a general PICU

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.