Abstract
In this article, the feasibility of propidium iodide (PI) staining based on cell membrane damage as a sensitive and quantitative method to test the cytotoxicity of typical lipophilic compounds including 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) was examined. The sensitivity of PI staining was compared to that of the methylthiazol-2-yl-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. We found a good correlation between PI uptake and increasing concentrations of TCP (10–50 μM) and PFOS (20–50 μM) at lower concentrations than those between growth inhibition ratio determined by the MTT assay and increasing concentrations of TCP (150–400 μM) and PFOS (100–500 μM). These findings indicated that the PI staining was more sensitive than the MTT assay. Furthermore, both the amount of PI uptake and the ratio of morphologically changed cells increased with increasing TCP concentrations, suggesting that PI staining may be a suitable quantitative substitute for the original method based on the observation of morphological changes in Vero cells. Our data also suggest that it is possible that the cell membrane damage that resulted in increased PI uptake may be due to variations in the phospholipid and protein content of the membrane, which are affected by interactions between the lipophilic compounds and components of the cell membrane.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.