Abstract
To test the efficacy of ceftazidime in irrigating solution during vitrectomy to prevent experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa endophthalmitis. Thirty-two rabbit eyes were divided into 6 groups. Vitrectomy using one of two different irrigating solutions was followed by intravitreal injection of P. aeruginosa: Group 1, balanced salt solution (BSS) followed by 100 colony-forming units (CFU) P. aeruginosa; Group 2, BSS fortified with ceftazidime 175 microg/mL (CBSS) followed by intravitreal injection of 100 CFU P. aeruginosa; Group 3, BSS followed by 500 CFU P. aeruginosa; Group 4, CBSS followed by 500 CFU P. aeruginosa; Group 5, BSS followed by 5000 CFU P. aeruginosa; and Group 6, CBSS followed by 5000 CFU P. aeruginosa. The eyes were examined clinically. Vitreous samples were cultured and histology was performed. Group 1: Three of 5 eyes showed mild to moderate vitreous opacities. Group 2: No vitreous opacities developed. Group 3: All eyes demonstrated endophthalmitis. Group 4: All 6 eyes had clear vitreous with visible fundus. Group 5: Severe endophthalmitis occurred in all 6 eyes. Group 6: Four eyes had clearly visible fundus, 2 eyes had hazy vitreous with red reflex of the fundus. Bacterial growth in groups 3, 4, 5, and 6 was seen in 4/4, 1/6, 6/6, and 0/6 eyes, respectively. When 100-5000 CFU P. aeruginosa were injected after vitrectomy, ceftazidime in the irrigating solution inhibited the signs of intraocular inflammation, and the rate of positive bacterial culture.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.