Abstract
The empirical findings discussed here tend to substantiate the original preise that variation in tax burden across states is too significant to be “hidden” in aggregate analysis. The evidence shows that states do not, in fact, possess the same incidence pattern as some aggregate measures might suggest. It has been found instead that due to differences in local tax assignment and the tax instruments used, incidence patterns vary widely. It was also found that the property tax exerts a significant regressive influence in every state.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
