Abstract
This paper discusses the organization, selection and distribution of pronouns within the four selected presidential speeches, two from the former president Clinton, and the other two from President Bush (Jr.). It is argued that personal attitude and political ideologies can be reflected in the use of pronouns. And it is also argued that strategies used by the two presidents are quite similar, in spite of their differences in party background, political viewpoints and policies. And the reason for this is that they embrace similar purposes when delivering their speeches. So it is obvious that, for a speaker esp. a politician, to better fulfill their aims, they should attach more significance to the employment of the pronominal system.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
