Abstract
The detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has been employed in prognosticating the likelihood of recurrence and metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC). Nonetheless, the findings remain enigmatic. This meta-analysis aims to systematically assess the predictive utility of CTCs detection in postoperative recurrence and metastasis among CRC patients. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to March 2023. Pooled estimates including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve were computed to gauge the predictive value. The QUADAS-2 tool was employed to appraise bias risks in individual studies. The assessment of publication bias in the included literature was performed using Deek's funnel plot. The study encompassed 16 articles and 2037 patients. After synthesizing the pertinent indices, CTCs monitoring demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.79) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.55-0.83), respectively. The corresponding values for positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 2.4 (95% CI, 1.5-4.0), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.29-0.58), and 6 (95% CI, 3-13). The summary receiver operating characteristic curve yielded an area under the curve of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.80). Deek's funnel plot analysis revealed no significant evidence of publication bias (P = .42). This investigation underscores the potential of CTCs detection as a noninvasive modality to efficaciously prognosticate postoperative recurrence and metastasis in CRC.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.