Prognosis of lymph node metastasis confined to lateral pelvic or mesenteric nodes in mid–low rectal cancer: multicentre retrospective cohort study

We examined the clinicopathological characteristics of rectal cancer patients with lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis in order to clarify their associated prognostic factors. A total of 91 rectal cancer patients with LPLN metastasis who underwent curative resection at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 1985 and 2004 were reviewed. The five-year overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate of the studied patient were 39% and 27%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that tumor differentiation, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, mesenteric lymph node status and LPLN status were significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor differentiation, mesenteric lymph node status and LPLN status were significant prognostic factors. Among 15 patients with LPLN metastasis and without mesenteric lymph node metastasis, 11 patients (73.3%) with one or two LPLN metastases survived more than five years. Among 12 patients with four or more LPLN metastases, two(16.7%) survived more than five years. Tumor differentiation, mesenteric lymph node status and LPLN status are significant prognostic factors of patients with LPLN metastasis. Because some patients with LPLN metastasis survive for a long period, LPLN dissection should be considered for them.

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection improves oncological outcomes in rectal cancer patients with suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. However, the indication for this procedure remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for lateral lymph node metastasis and the indications for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. A multi-institutional retrospective study. This study was conducted at 3 university hospitals. This study involved 105 patients with locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer and clinically suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis who underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection between 2015 and 2020. Indications were set using lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis-associated preoperative factors. Among 105 patients, 36 (34.3%) had pathologically confirmed lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis and 77 (73.3%) underwent preoperative chemoradiation. Tumors located within 5 cm distance from the anal verge ( p = 0.02) and initial node size ≥ 6 mm ( p = 0.001) were significant predictors of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. The sensitivity was 100% (36/36) with a cutoff of 6 mm for the initial node size and 94.4% (34/36) with a cutoff of 8 mm for the initial node size. When using initial node size cutoffs of 8 mm for anal verge-to-tumor distance of >5 cm and 6 mm for anal verge-to-tumor distance of ≤5 cm, the sensitivity of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis was found to be 100%. The retrospective design and small sample size were the limitations of this study. Initial node size and tumor height were significant predictors of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. This study proposed that an initial node size of ≥8 mm with an anal verge-to-tumor distance of >5 cm and ≥6 mm with an anal verge-to-tumor distance of ≤5 cm are optimal indications for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C101 . ANTECEDENTES:La disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales mejora los resultados oncológicos en pacientes con cáncer de recto con sospecha de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. Sin embargo, la indicación de este procedimiento sigue sin estar clara.OBJETIVO:Nuestro objetivo fue identificar los factores predictivos de la metástasis de los ganglios linfáticos laterales y las indicaciones para la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo multiinstitucional.AJUSTES:Este estudio se realizó en tres hospitales universitarios.PACIENTES:Este estudio involucró a 105 pacientes con cáncer de recto medio/bajo localmente avanzado y sospecha clínica de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales que se sometieron a una escisión mesorrectal total con disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales entre 2015 y 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las indicaciones se establecieron utilizando los factores preoperatorios asociados con la metástasis de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales.RESULTADOS:Entre 105 pacientes, 36 (34,3%) tenían metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales confirmada patológicamente y 77 (73,3%) se sometieron a quimiorradiación preoperatoria. Los tumores ubicados dentro de los 5 cm desde el borde anal ( p = 0,02) y el tamaño inicial del ganglio ( p = 0,001) fueron predictores significativos de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. La sensibilidad fue del 100 % (36/36), con un punto de corte de 6 mm para el tamaño inicial del ganglio, seguido de 8 mm para el tamaño inicial del ganglio (94,4%, 34/36). Cuando se utilizó un tamaño de corte inicial del ganglio de 8 mm para una distancia entre el borde anal y el tumor >5 cm y 6 mm para una distancia entre el borde anal y el tumor ≤5 cm, la sensibilidad de la metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales fue del 100 %.LIMITACIONES:El diseño retrospectivo y el pequeño tamaño de la muestra.CONCLUSIONES:El tamaño inicial del ganglio y la altura del tumor fueron predictores significativos de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. Este estudio propuso que un tamaño de ganglio inicial de ≥8 mm con un tumor a >5 cm del margen anal y ≥6 mm con un tumor a ≤5 cm del margen anal son indicaciones óptimas para la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en el cáncer de recto. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C101 . (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado ).

To clarify the risk factors of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis of rectal cancer, we examined associations between LPLN status and clinicopathological factors including LPLN status diagnosed by computed tomography (CT). We reviewed a total of 210 patients with advanced rectal cancer, of which the lower margin was located at or below the peritoneal reflection, who underwent preoperative CT with 5-mm-thick sections and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection at the National Cancer Center Hospital between February 1998 and March 2006. Forty-seven patients (22.4%) had LPLN metastasis. Multivariate analysis showed that LPLN status diagnosed by CT, pathological regional lymph node status, tumor location, and tumor differentiation were significant risk factors for LPLN metastasis. Among 45 patients with well-differentiated adenocarcinoma who were LPLN-negative and in whom CT had found no regional lymph node metastasis, none had LPLN metastasis. On the other hand, among 13 patients with moderate or less differentiated lower rectal adenocarcinoma who were LPLN-positive and in whom CT had revealed regional lymph node metastasis, 12 (92.3%) had LPLN metastasis. LPLN status diagnosed by CT, pathological regional LN status, tumor location, and tumor differentiation are significant risk factors for LPLN metastasis. Using these factors, patients can be classified as having a low or high risk of LPLN metastasis.

Lateral pelvic lymph nodes dissection of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: A prospective case-series and literature review

The aim of the present retrospective study was to investigate the predictability of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for pararectal lymph node (PRLN) metastasis and lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis in rectal cancer (RC). The present study involved 44 patients with RC who were examined by DECT and then underwent surgery between May 2015 and September 2017. LPLN dissection was performed in 24 patients. The normalized iodine concentration (nIC), the ratio of iodine concentration in the lymph node (LN) to that in the common iliac artery on DECT, of the largest PRLN and LPLN was calculated, and the association between LN metastasis and nIC was analyzed. The median nIC value for PRLNs was significantly lower in PRLN metastasis-positive cases compared with PRLN metastasis-negative cases in the arterial phase [0.18 vs. 0.25; P=0.01; cut-off, 0.24; area under the curve (AUC), 0.733] and portal phase (0.47 vs. 0.61; P=0.03; cut-off, 0.59; AUC, 0.701). A significant difference was not identified between the median maximum short axis diameter of PRLNs in PRLN metastasis-positive and metastasis-negative cases (7.6 vs. 6.4 mm; P=0.33). The nIC for LPLNs was not significantly different between LPLN metastasis-positive and metastasis-negative cases in the arterial phase (0.15 vs. 0.21; P=0.19); but was significantly lower in LPLN metastasis-positive cases compared with LPLN metastasis-negative cases in the portal phase (0.29 vs. 0.56; P=0.04; cut-off, 0.29; AUC, 0.877). The maximum short axis diameter of LPLNs was significantly larger in metastasis-positive cases compared with LPLN metastasis-negative cases (9.1 vs. 4.8 mm; P=0.03; cut-off, 7.0 mm; AUC, 0.912). In conclusion, the nIC was identified to be significantly lower in metastasis-positive cases, which may be useful for the prediction of PRLN and LPLN metastases. A combination of size-based diagnosis and DECT may increase the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis.

Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is rare, with unknown oncological features. We investigated the oncological impact of LPLN metastasis in patients with rectal NETs. This study included 214 patients with rectal NETs who underwent curative surgery. We evaluated their clinicopathological characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes. LPLN dissection was performed in 15 patients with LPLN swelling ≥ 7mm (preoperative imaging); 12 patients had LPLN metastases, 6 of whom had LPLN metastases without mesorectal lymph node metastases (skip metastasis). The short-term outcomes were similar between the groups with and without LPLN dissection. The median follow-up period was 59.4months, and patients with LPLN metastasis showed significantly shorter disease-free and overall survival rates than those without metastasis. Among 199 patients who did not undergo LPLN dissection, only 1 had LPLN recurrence. In a univariate analysis, tumor depth, tumor grade, and LPLN metastasis were associated with the overall survival. In the multivariate analysis, only LPLN metastasis was an independent predictor of the overall survival. LPLN metastasis is a poor prognostic factor for patients with rectal NETs. LPLN enlargement can be considered an indication for dissection, owing to its high rate of metastasis and associated poor prognosis.

Lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis is an important metastatic mode and a major cause of locoregional recurrence of mid-low rectal cancer. Recently, there is an East-West discrepancy in regard to the diagnosis, clinical significance, treatment and prognosis of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. In the West, lateral nodal involvement may represent systemic disease and preoperative chemoradiotherapy can sterilize clinically suspected lateral nodes. Thus, in many Western countries, the standard therapy for lower rectal cancer is total mesorectal excision with chemoradiotherapy, and pelvic sidewall dissection is rarely performed. In the East, and Japan in particular, however, there is a positive attitude in regard to lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND). They consider that lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis is as regional metastasis, and the clinically suspected lateral nodes can not be removed by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The selective LPND after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy may be found to be promising treatment for the improvement of therapeutic benefits in these patients. Therefore, the large-scale prospective studies are urgently required to improve selection criteria for LPND and neoadjuvant treatment to prevent overtreatment in the near future. Selective LPND after neoadjuvant treatment based on modern imaging techniques is expected to reduce locoregional recurrence and improve long-term survival in patients with mid-low rectal cancer.

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy can decrease local recurrence to lateral compartments, thereby providing survival benefits. The safety of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy was investigated, and the surgical indications and survival benefits of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection were established on the basis of preoperative characteristics. A multicenter retrospective study. Three hospitals in China. Four hundred nine patients with clinical evidence of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. Patients who received lateral pelvic lymph node dissection were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they received chemoradiotherapy (n = 139) or not (n = 270). The safety, indications, and survival benefits of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy were investigated. The surgery times were significantly prolonged by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (291.3 vs 265.5 min; p = 0.021). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that poor/mucinous/signet-ring adenocarcinoma (OR = 4.42, 95% CI, 2.24-11.27; p = 0.031) and postchemoradiotherapy lateral pelvic lymph node short-axis diameter ≥7 mm (OR = 15.2, 95% CI, 5.89-53.01; p < 0.001) were independent predictive factors for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. Multivariate prognostic analysis showed that swollen lateral pelvic lymph nodes beyond the obturator or internal iliac as well as the involvement of 3 or more lateral pelvic lymph nodes were independent adverse prognostic factors. The retrospective nature of the study and the small sample size were the limitations of this study. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is a practicable procedure with acceptable morbidity. Postchemoradiotherapy lateral pelvic lymph node short-axis diameter ≥7 mm and poor/signet/mucinous adenocarcinoma could be used for predicting lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis after chemoradiotherapy. However, lateral pelvic lymph node dissection should be carefully considered in patients with swollen lateral pelvic lymph nodes beyond the obturator or internal iliac region or involvement of multiple lateral pelvic lymph nodes. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C133 . ANTECEDENTES:La disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria puede disminuir la recurrencia local en los compartimentos laterales, lo que brinda beneficios de supervivencia.OBJETIVO:Se investigó la seguridad de la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria, y se establecieron las indicaciones quirúrgicas y los beneficios de supervivencia de la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en función de las características preoperatorias.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico.ESCENARIO:Tres hospitales en China.PACIENTES:Cuatrocientos nueve pacientes con evidencia clínica de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes que recibieron disección de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales se dividieron en dos grupos dependiendo de si recibieron quimiorradioterapia (n = 139) o no (n = 270).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se investigaron la seguridad, las indicaciones y los beneficios de supervivencia de la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria.RESULTADOS:Los tiempos de cirugía se prolongaron significativamente con la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria (291,3 vs 265,5 min, p = 0,021). El análisis multivariable demostró que el adenocarcinoma mal diferenciado/mucinoso/en anillo de sello (odds ratio = 4,42, intervalo de confianza del 95%, 2,24-11,27; p = 0,031) y el diámetro del eje corto de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia ≥7 mm (odds ratio = 15,2, intervalo de confianza del 95%, 5,89-53,01; p < 0,001) fueron factores predictivos independientes de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. El análisis pronóstico multivariable mostró que la inflamación de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales más allá del obturador o la ilíaca interna, así como la afectación de tres o más ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales, eran factores pronósticos adversos independientes.LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio y el pequeño tamaño de la muestra.CONCLUSIONES:La quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria combinada con la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales es un procedimiento practicable con una morbilidad aceptable. Posterior a la quimiorradioterapia, el diámetro del eje corto de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales ≥7 mm y el adenocarcinoma pobre/en sello/mucinoso podrían usarse para predecir la metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia. Sin embargo, la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales debe considerarse cuidadosamente en pacientes con ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales inflamados más allá del obturador o de la región ilíaca interna o compromiso de múltiples ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C133 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

BackgroundThere is still controversy regarding the clinical value and significance of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) dissection (LPND). The present study aimed to investigate whether the addition of LPND to total mesorectal excision (TME) confers survival benefits in rectal cancer patients with clinical lateral pelvic node metastasis (LPNM).MethodsFrom January 2015 to January 2021, a total of 141 rectal cancer patients with clinical evidence of LPNM who underwent TME + LPND were retrospectively analysed and divided into the LPNM group (n = 29) and the non-LPNM group (n = 112). The LPNM group was further subdivided into a high-risk LPNM group (n = 14) and a low-risk LPNM group (n = 15). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize selection bias. The primary outcomes of this study were 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).ResultsOf the 141 patients undergoing LPND, the local recurrence rate of patients with LPNM was significantly higher than that of patients without LPNM both before (27.6% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.001) and after (27.6% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.025) PSM. Multivariate analysis revealed that LPNM was an independent risk factor for not only OS (HR: 3.06; 95% CI, 1.15–8.17; P = 0.025) but also DFS (HR: 2.39; 95% CI, 1.18–4.87; P = 0.016) in patients with LPNM after TME + LPND. When the LPNM group was further subdivided, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that OS and DFS were significantly better in the low-risk group (obturator/internal iliac artery region and < 2 positive LPNs).ConclusionEven after LPND, LPNM patients have a poor prognosis. Moreover, LPNM is an independent poor prognostic factor affecting OS and DFS after TME + LPND. However, LPND appears to confer survival benefits to specific patients with single LPN involvement in the obturator region or internal iliac vessel region. Furthermore, LPND may have no indication in stage IV patients and should be selected carefully.

There is a lack of consensus regarding treating involved lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and MRI-based factors associated with pathological lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing total neoadjuvant therapy and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. This is a retrospective study. This study was conducted at a single comprehensive cancer center. A total of 107 patients with advanced low rectal cancer with pretreatment enlarged lateral pelvic lymph nodes (≥7 mm in long axis) undergoing total neoadjuvant therapy with long-course chemoradiotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, were enrolled. Pathological lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis and survival. Among 107 patients, short-axis lateral node diameter at baseline was <7 mm in 48 patients and ≥7 mm in 59 patients. The ≥7 mm group showed significantly higher rates of pathological lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis (44.1% vs 2.1%; p < 0.0001). In this group, pathological lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis was independently associated with pretreatment malignant features and posttreatment short-axis diameter ≥4 mm. Five-year relapse-free survival was significantly lower in patients with posttreatment lateral node diameter ≥4 mm than those with <4 mm (71.1% vs 86.2%, p = 0.0364). Patients with pathological lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis had significantly lower overall survival, relapse-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival rates. Selection bias exists in a retrospective analysis. Pathological lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis is rare in patients with pretreatment short-axis diameter <7 mm. In patients with pretreatment short-axis diameter ≥7 mm, pretreatment malignant features and posttreatment short-axis diameter are both associated with pathological lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. These factors should be considered when deciding whether to proceed with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after total neoadjuvant therapy. See Video Abstract. ANTECEDENTES:No existe consenso sobre el tratamiento de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales afectados en el cáncer rectal.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar los factores clínicos y basados en imágenes de resonancia magnética asociados con la metástasis patológica de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales en pacientes sometidos a terapia neoadyuvante total y disección lateral de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos.DISEO:Este es un estudio retrospectivo.EORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se llevó a cabo en un solo centro oncológico integral.PACIENTES:Se inscribieron 107 pacientes con cáncer rectal bajo avanzado con ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales agrandados antes del tratamiento (≥7 mm en el eje largo) sometidos a terapia neoadyuvante total con quimiorradioterapia de larga duración, seguida de escisión mesorrectal total y disección de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Metástasis patológica de ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales y supervivencia.RESULTADOS:Entre 107 pacientes, 48 tenían un diámetro ganglionar lateral en el eje corto <7 mm al inicio, mientras que 59 tenían ≥7 mm. El grupo de ≥7 mm mostró tasas significativamente más altas de metástasis patológica de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales (44,1% vs 2,1%; p < 0,0001). En este grupo, la metástasis patológica de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales se asoció de forma independiente con características malignas previas al tratamiento y un diámetro ganglionar lateral posterior al tratamiento ≥4 mm. La supervivencia sin recidiva a los cinco años fue significativamente menor en pacientes con un diámetro ganglionar lateral posterior al tratamiento ≥4 mm que en aquellos con un diámetro <4 mm (71,1% vs 86,2%, p = 0,0364). Los pacientes con la metástasis patológica de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales tuvieron tasas de supervivencia global, supervivencia sin recidiva y supervivencia sin recurrencia local significativamente más bajas.LIMITACIONES:Existe sesgo de selección en un análisis retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:La metástasis patológica de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales es poco frecuente en pacientes con un diámetro del eje corto previo al tratamiento <7 mm. En pacientes con un diámetro del eje corto previo al tratamiento ≥7 mm, las características malignas previas al tratamiento y el diámetro del eje corto posterior al tratamiento se asocian con metástasis patológica de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales. Estos factores deben tenerse en cuenta al decidir si se debe proceder a la disección de los ganglios linfáticos pélvicos laterales después de la terapia neoadyuvante total. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

We assessed the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis in patients with advanced low-rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and LPLN dissection (LPLD) for clinically suspected LPLN metastasis. Our aim was to identify the optimal indications for LPLD. The study population consisted of 77 patients with advanced low-rectal cancer who underwent LPLD for clinically suspicious LPLN metastasis after preoperative CRT. MRI findings before/after CRT, clinical factors, and LPLN metastasis were evaluated. LPLN metastasis was confirmed in 31 patients (40.3 %). Metastasis was significantly higher in patients with LPLNs with a short-axis diameter ≥8 mm than in patients with LPLNs with a short-axis diameter <8 mm before CRT (75 vs. 20 %, P < 0.0001). LPLN metastasis was also significantly higher in patients with LPLNs with a short-axis diameter >5 mm than in patients with LPLNs with a short-axis diameter ≤5 mm after CRT (75 vs. 20 %, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed the independent association of female sex [P = 0.0192; odds ratio (OR) 5.616; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.315-28.942], pre-CRT short-axis diameter of the LPLN ≥8 mm (P = 0.0047; OR 9.188; 95 % CI 1.948-54.366), and CRT without induction systemic chemotherapy (P = 0.0285; OR 9.235; 95 % CI 1.241-106.947) with LPLN metastasis. MRI before CRT is useful to predict LPLN metastasis and to determine the indications for LPLD.

Oncological outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy remain to be elucidated. The purpose of this study was to clarify the therapeutic effect of chemoradiotherapy on lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis, the risk factors of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis, and oncological outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after chemoradiotherapy. This was a nonrandomized, retrospective study. The study was conducted at a tertiary referral university hospital. Patients with rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery from 2003 to 2015 (N = 222) were included. Radiation (total, 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) with concomitant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy was administered. Lateral pelvic lymph nodes with a diameter of ≥8 mm before chemoradiotherapy were selectively dissected. Frequency and risk factors of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis were examined. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in 31 patients (14.0%), and 16 (51.6%) of these patients were pathologically diagnosed as positive for metastasis. Among the patients treated with total mesorectal excision alone (n = 191), 2 (0.9%) had recurrence in the lateral pelvic lymph node area, which was pathologically confirmed after salvage R0 resection. T category downstaging (73.3% vs 12.5%; p < 0.01) and high histological regression of the primary lesion (73.3% vs 18.8%; p < 0.01) were more frequent in patients with pathologically negative lateral pelvic lymph nodes than in those with positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes. Young age, short distance from the anal verge, and enlarged lateral pelvic lymph node before chemoradiotherapy were associated with lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. The study was limited by its retrospective nature and small study population. The incidence of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis after chemoradiotherapy was estimated to be 8.1% (18/222). Young age, short distance from the anal verge, and enlarged lateral pelvic lymph node before chemoradiotherapy were risk factors of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis after chemoradiotherapy.

The aim of this study was to elucidate the risk factors for and prognostic value of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis in advanced rectal cancer patients, including those with stage IV disease. The treatment outcomes of 78 patients with advanced rectal cancer, the lower margin of which was located at or below the peritoneal reflection, who underwent curative-intent surgery with bilateral LPLN dissection from 2005 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 78 rectal cancer patients, including 13 patients with stage IV tumors, 9 patients (11.5%) had LPLN metastasis. A multivariate analysis to identify preoperative clinical factors associated with LPLN metastasis showed that tumor location (below the peritoneal reflection: Rb), LPLN metastasis on preoperative imaging and distant metastasis were independent predictors of LPLN metastasis. In addition, metastasis at the regional lymph nodes in the mesorectum was significantly associated with LPLN metastasis. Both the disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with LPLN metastasis were significantly worse in comparison to patients without LPLN metastasis, and the CSS of stage IV patients with LPLN metastasis was significantly worse in comparison to stage IV patients without LPLN metastasis. Tumor location (Rb), LPLN metastasis on preoperative imaging and distant metastasis were risk factors for LPLN metastasis. The prognosis of rectal cancer patients with LPLN metastasis is poor. There may not be the indication of LPLN dissection in stage IV lower rectal cancer except cases having complaints due to LPLN metastasis.

Predictive factors of pathological lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients without clinical lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis (clinical stage II/III): The analysis of data from the clinical trial (JCOG0212)

The aim of this study was to elucidate the diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) for lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) metastasis in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Eighteen rectal cancer patients with enlarged (≥ 8mm) LPNs were treated with CRT followed by total mesorectal excision with LPN dissection during 2012-2015. After CRT, LPN maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax) were measured using PET/CT and long diameters of LPNs were measured using CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). LPN size and SUVmax were compared with pathological status in the resected specimen. Radiologically identified nodes were matched with surgically resected nodes by separate examination of 4 lymph nodal regions: internal iliac, obturator, external iliac and common iliac lymph nodes. In total, 34 LPNs were located by CT or MRI. Metastatic LPNs were significantly larger than non-metastatic LPNs (size, mean ± standard deviation: 13.0 ± 8.3 vs. 4.9 ± 3.5mm, p < 0.01). SUVmax was determinable for 28 of the LPNs, among which metastatic LPNs were found to have significantly higher SUVmax than non-metastatic LPNs (mean ± standard deviation: 2.2 ± 1.3 vs. 1.2 ± 0.3, p < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested optimal cutoff values of size = 12mm which had an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 82.1, 70.6, 100, 100, and 68.8%, respectively. An SUVmax = 1.6 had an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 85.7, 76.5, 100, 100, and 73.3%, respectively. When LPNs that were ≥ 12mm in size and/or had an SUV ≥ 1.6, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 92.9, 88.2, 100, 100, and 84.6%, respectively. After CRT, PET/CT alone or in combination with CT and MRI can predict the presence of metastatic LPN with a high degree of accuracy. PET/CT may be useful in selecting patients with rectal cancer who would benefit from LPN dissection in addition to TME. These results need to be confirmed by larger studies.