Abstract
Accurate staging of cancer underpins the decision making for individual patients, the collection of outcomes data and the development of appropriate services. Unfortunately, this is not something that the wider oncology community has done well and there are many valid reasons why this part of cancer patient management has proved challenging. However, there are ways in which Clinical Radiologists can improve on staging reporting and contribute to better patient care. The CASPAR project was set up to explore the value of, and the processes necessary, for proforma reporting in common cancers. Audits of histopathology reporting of colorectal cancer stage have shown an increase in minimum staging data from 31%-100% following the introduction of proforma reporting. As a consequence, minimum data-set reporting of prognostic histopathological data for resected cancers has become a global standard of care. The impact that this has on clinical outcomes is evident from subsequent studies which have shown that patients with staging reports where data set items are missing have poorer survival outcomes. Imaging reporting, and the accurate identification of tumour stage, plays a critical role in the allocation of patients to appropriate pathways, particularly in those cancers where preoperative strategies are employed for identifiable groups of patients. The CASPAR project sought to test the hypothesis that reporting practice and staging could improve through the implementation of proformas. The results will be discussed during this meeting but they do show an absolute improvement of 40% in hospitals that successfully made the implementation. Barriers to implementation are multifactorial but there are important issues with regard to technical capability and workforce availability. National data collection and entry into research trials requires accurate staging and both are likely to be enhanced by the consistency, completeness and accuracy that structured proformas encourage.
Highlights
Accurate staging of cancer underpins the decision making for individual patients, the collection of outcomes data and the development of appropriate services
There are ways in which Clinical Radiologists can improve on staging reporting and contribute to better patient care
Minimum data-set reporting of prognostic histopathological data for resected cancers has become a global standard of care. The impact that this has on clinical outcomes is evident from subsequent studies which have shown that patients with staging reports where data set items are missing have poorer survival outcomes
Summary
Accurate staging of cancer underpins the decision making for individual patients, the collection of outcomes data and the development of appropriate services. Diana Tait From International Cancer Imaging Society Meeting and 15th Annual Teaching Course (ICIS 2015) London, UK. This is not something that the wider oncology community has done well and there are many valid reasons why this part of cancer patient management has proved challenging. There are ways in which Clinical Radiologists can improve on staging reporting and contribute to better patient care.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.