Procedural volume and outcomes with atrial fibrillation ablation: A report from the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry

Abstract

BackgroundThe association of hospital and physician procedure volume with outcome has not been well evaluated for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in contemporary practice. ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the association between hospital and physician AF ablation volume and procedural success (isolation of all pulmonary veins) and major adverse events (MAEs). MethodsProcedures reported to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry AFib Ablation Registry between July 2019 and June 2022 were included. Hospital and physician procedural volumes were annualized and stratified into quartiles to compare outcomes. Three-level hierarchical (patient, hospital, and physician) models were used to assess the procedural volume–outcome relationship. ResultsA total of 70,296 first-time AF ablations at 186 US hospitals were included. Overall, procedural success and MAE rates were 98.5% and 1.0%, respectively. With hospital volume (Q4) as a reference, the likelihood of procedural success was lower for Q1 (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29–0.68), Q2 (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33–0.75), and Q3 (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40–0.89); the results were similarly significant for physician volume. With MAE for hospitals, there was an inverse procedural volume relationship for Q1 (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.26–2.52) but not for Q2 (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.77–1.46) or Q3 (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.89–1.58) and similarly for physicians in Q1 and Q2 but not in Q3. An adjusted MAE ≤1% was predicted by an annual volume of approximately 190 for hospitals and 60 for physicians. ConclusionIn this national cohort, hospital and physician AF ablation procedural volumes were directly related to acute procedural success and inversely related to rates of MAE.