Problems with the estimation of urine protein by automated assays

Abstract

Objectives: Most clinical laboratories replaced their manual precipitation techniques for the determination of urinary protein with automated dye binding assays or benzethonium chloride-turbidimetric assays. Few studies have validated these assays for the measurement of urinary proteins in the normal range. Design and methods: This study compares four automated assays for the measurement of urinary protein to a manual Ponceau S/TCA precipitation assay. We evaluated the linearity, the precision, the analytical sensitivity, the accuracy and the recovery of different proteins for each assay. Results: All assays showed good linearity with the theoretical concentration of albumin present in the sample. The coefficient of variation was below 10% at a concentration of 0.142 g/L. However, the manual Ponceau S/TCA assay demonstrated superior analytical sensitivity. Accuracy determinations showed a variable positive bias and poor correlations at concentrations below 0.1 g/L when compared to the Ponceau S/TCA assay. Small molecular weight peptides particularly affected the pyrogallol red assays but other urinary components also interfered with the automated assays. Conclusions: Most automated assays show high imprecision and poor accuracy for the measurement of urinary protein in the normal range. The Ponceau S/TCA offers a precise and accurate manual alternative to these automated assays.