Abstract

Traditional dosimeter measures, using a microphone in the sound field, provide little information about the actual noise exposure experienced by a subject wearing earplugs, earmuffs, earphones (traditional or insert), or someone exposed to a highly directional or local noise source. In these instances, the noise at the eardrum would appear to be a more useful measure, but cannot be directly compared to traditional damage risk criteria because the latter are based on measurements in a diffuse sound field. If a simple bridged‐T filter network [Killion, J. Audio Eng. Soc. 27, 13–16 (1979)] correcting for the transfer function between the diffuse field and the eardrum is interposed between a flat‐frequency‐response probe microphone and a dosimeter, the resulting dosimeter indication can be compared directly to traditional damage risk criteria. Techniques for minimizing the potential errors in such measurements will be discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.