Primary chest wall sarcoma: advances in surgical management and outcomes

Sarcomas of the chest wall are rare, and wide surgical resection is generally the cornerstone of treatment. The objective of our study was to evaluate outcome of full-thickness resections of recurrent and primary chest wall sarcomas. To evaluate morbidity, mortality, and overall and disease-free survival after surgical resection of primary and recurrent chest wall sarcomas, we performed a retrospective review of all patients with sarcomas of the chest wall surgically treated at two tertiary oncologic referral centers between January 1980 and December 2006. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, as well as the follow-up of these patients, were retrieved from the patients' original records. One hundred twenty-seven patients were included in this study, 83 patients with a primary sarcoma and 44 patients with a recurrence. Age, sex, tumor size, histologic type, grade and localization on the chest wall were similar for both groups. Fewer neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies were used in the treatment of recurrences. Chest wall resection was more extensive in the recurrent group, which did not result in more complications (23%) or more reinterventions (5%). Microscopically radical resection was achieved in 80% of the primary sarcomas and 64% of the recurrences. With a median follow-up of 73 months, disease-free survival after surgery for recurrences was 18 months versus 36 months for primary sarcomas, with 5-year survival rates of 50% and 63%, respectively. Although chances for local control are lower after surgical treatment of recurrent chest wall sarcoma, chest wall resection is a safe and effective procedure, with an acceptable survival.

Surgical Treatment for Primary Chest Wall Sarcoma: A Single-Institution Study

Background: Primary chest wall sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of chest wall tumors that require multimodal oncologic and surgical therapy. The aim of this study was to review our experience regarding the surgical treatment of chest wall sarcomas, evaluating the short- and long-term results. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, patients who underwent surgery for soft tissue and bone sarcoma of the chest wall between 1999 and 2018 were included. We analyzed the oncologic and surgical outcomes of chest wall resections and reconstructions, assessing overall and recurrence-free survival and the associated clinical factors. Results: In total, 44 patients underwent chest wall resection for primary chest wall sarcoma, of which 18 (41%) received surgery only, 10 (23%) received additional chemoradiotherapy, 7% (3) received surgery with chemotherapy, and 30% (13) received radiotherapy in addition to surgery. No perioperative mortality occurred. Five-year overall survival was 51.5% (CI 95%: 36.1–73.4%), and median overall survival was 1973 days (CI 95% 1461; -). As determined in the univariate analysis, the presence of metastasis upon admission and tumor grade were significantly associated with shorter survival (p = 0.037 and p < 0.01, respectively). Five-year recurrence-free survival was 71.5% (95% CI 57.6%; 88.7%). Tumor resection margins and metastatic disease upon diagnosis were significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Conclusion: Surgical therapy is the cornerstone of the treatment of chest wall sarcomas and can be performed safely. Metastasis and high tumor grade have a negative influence on overall survival, while tumor margins and metastasis have a negative influence on local recurrence.

Background & ObjectivesPrimary chest wall sarcomas are rare and therapeutically challenging tumors. Herein we report the outcomes of a surgery-based multimodality therapy for these pathologies over an 11-year period. In addition, we present a case that illustrates the surgical challenges that extensive chest wall resection may pose.MethodsUsing the Society of Thoracic Surgeons general thoracic surgery database, we have prospectively collected data in our institute on all patients undergoing chest wall resection and reconstruction for primary chest wall sarcomas between June 2008–October 2019.ResultsWe performed 28 surgical procedures on 25 patients aged 5 to 91 years (median age 33). Eleven tumors were bone- and cartilage-derived and 14 tumors originated from soft tissue elements. Seven patients (7/25, 28%) received neo-adjuvant therapy and 14 patients (14/25, 56%) received adjuvant therapy. The median number of ribs that were resected was 2.5 (range 0 to 6). In 18/28 (64%) of surgeries, additional skeletal or visceral organs were removed, including: diaphragm [1], scapula [2], sternum [2], lung [2], vertebra [1], clavicle [1] and colon [1]. Chest wall reconstruction was deemed necessary in 16/28 (57%) of cases, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Gore-Tex patches was used in 13/28 (46%) of cases and biological flaps where used in 4/28 (14%) of cases. R0, R1 and R2 resection margins were achieved in 19/28 (68%), 9/28 (32%) and 0/28 (0%) of cases, respectively. The median follow up time was 33 months (range 2 to 138). During the study period, disease recurred in 8/25 (32%) of patients. Of these, 3 were re-operated on and are free of disease. At date of last follow up, 5/25 (20%) of patients have died due to their disease and in contrast, 20/25 (80%) were alive with no evidence of disease.ConclusionsSurgery-based multimodality therapy is an effective treatment approach for primary chest wall sarcomas. Resection of additional skeletal or visceral organs and reconstruction with synthetic and/or biological flaps is often required in order to obtain R0 resection margins. Ultimately, long-term survival in this clinical scenario is an achievable goal.

Single-Institution, Multidisciplinary Experience with Surgical Resection of Primary Chest Wall Sarcomas

BackgroundPrimary chest wall sarcoma is a rare disease with limited reports of surgical resection.MethodsThis retrospective review included 41 patients with primary chest wall sarcoma who underwent chest wall resection and reconstruction from 2001 to 2015. The clinical, histologic, and surgical variables were collected and analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).ResultsThe OS rates at 5 and 10 years were 73% and 61%, respectively. The RFS rate at 10 years was 57.1%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed old age (hazard ratio [HR], 5.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.71–15.48) as a significant risk factor for death. A surgical resection margin distance of less than 1.5 cm (HR, 15.759; 95% CI, 1.78–139.46) and histologic grade III (HR, 28.36; 95% CI, 2.76–290.87) were independent risk factors for recurrence.ConclusionLong-term OS and RFS after the surgical resection of primary chest wall sarcoma were clinically acceptable.

Chest wall sarcomas are rare and may demonstrate heterogeneous features. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy used as adjuncts. Herein, we report outcomes of a large cohort of patients with primary chest wall sarcoma who underwent resection. Records of 121 patients who underwent resection forprimary chest wall sarcoma between 1998 and 2013 were reviewed. A thoracic pathologist reexamined all tumors and categorized them according to grade. Univariable and multivariable Cox analyses were conducted to identify predictors of overall survival (OS). The median age was 45.0 (range, 11-81) years, and most tumors (63.6%, 77) were high grade. The median tumor size was 7 cm (range, 1-21 cm). Fifty-nine (48.8%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 12 (9.9%) received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. A complete resection was achieved in 103 (85.1%) patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.532) and radiation ( P = 1.000) were not associated with a complete resection. Five-year OS among patients undergoing R0 and R1 resections was 61.9% and 27.8%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified high grade (HR, 15.21; CI, 3.57-64.87; P < 0.001), R1 (HR, 3.10; CI, 1.40-6.86; P = 0.005), R2 resection (HR, 5.18; CI, 1.91-14.01; P = 0.001), and age (HR, 1.02; CI, 1.01-1.03; P = 0.002) as predictors of OS. In this series of resected chest wall sarcomas, complete resection and tumor grade remain the most important survival predictors. Individual decisions are required for the utilization of neoadjuvant therapy.

Primary chest wall sarcoma; a single institution experience of 3 years

ObjectivesWe aimed to analyze survival, predictors of outcome, and the long-term functional status of patients with a diagnosis of primary chest wall sarcoma who undergo chest wall resection and reconstruction. MethodsWe analyzed a prospectively maintained database, including all patients operated on between 2008 and 2021. The primary outcome measures were overall and disease-free survival and analyses were employed to determine the risk factors for poor survival and recurrence. ResultsOne hundred thirty-nine patients were included, 55% were men. The majority (96%) had an R0 resection and 75.1% had no postoperative complications up to 30 days postprocedure; median length of hospital stay was 7 days (range, 6-10 days). Median overall and disease-free survival was 58.8 and 53.6 months, respectively. For those alive, at long-term follow-up, 80% had a Medical Research Council dyspnea score of 0 and Karnofsky index >80%. Survival and mortality rates were better in chondrosarcomas compared with nonchondromatous sarcomas (P < .05). Previous history of radiotherapy, previous history of cancer, the type of sarcoma (Ewing's or soft tissue), the need for adjuvant treatment and tumor grade were significant predictors of mortality and recurrence on univariate testing. Extended resection, a higher number of ribs removed, and the incidence of postoperative complications were significantly associated with a worse postoperative Medical Research Council dyspnea score. ConclusionsCareful patient selection and multidisciplinary decision making is crucial. This leads to clear resection margins, good overall, and disease-free survival and good functional outcomes.

Chest wall sarcomas are rare, aggressive malignancies, the management of which mainly revolves around surgery. Radical tumour excision with free margins represents the optimal treatment for loco-regional clinically resectable disease. The objective of this study was to review our 11-year experience with chest wall resection for primary and metastatic sarcomas, focusing on surgical techniques and strategies for reconstruction. Retrospective analysis of a comprehensive database of patients who underwent chest wall resection for primary or secondary sarcoma at our Institute from January 2009 to December 2019. Out of 26 patients, 21 (81%) suffered from primary chest wall sarcoma, while 5 (19%) had recurring disease. The median number of resected ribs was 3. Sternal resection was performed in 6 cases (23%). Prosthetic thoracic reconstruction was deemed necessary in 24 cases (92%). Tumour recurrence was observed in 15 patients (58%). The median overall survival was 73.6 months. Primary and secondary tumours showed comparable survival (P = 0.49). At univariate analysis, disease recurrence and infiltrated margins on pathological specimens were associated with poorer survival (P = 0.014 and 0.022, respectively). In patients with primary sarcoma, the median progression-free survival was 13.3 months. Associated visceral resections were significantly associated to postoperative complications (P = 0.02). Chest wall resection followed by prosthetic reconstruction is feasible in carefully selected patients and should be performed by experienced surgeons with the aim of achieving free resection margins, resulting in improved long-term outcomes.

Sarcomas of the bone and soft tissues are detected after the onset of pain, detectable mass and related symptoms in the absence of a standardized screening examination. However, primary chest wall sarcomas can be incidentally detected upon chest X-ray or computed tomography. Previous studies of incidental primary chest wall sarcomas lack prognosis and disease-specific clinical data. This study aimed to investigate the prognoses of patients with incidental chest wall sarcomas and compare them with those of symptomatic patients. This study included 18 patients diagnosed with primary chest wall sarcoma between 2010 and 2023. Patient information such as age, sex, tumour diameter, tumour location, symptoms, treatment, time to treatment initiation, pathological diagnosis and outcome were retrospectively analysed. Among the 18 patients, the sarcomas were incidentally detected in five by chest X-ray and computed tomography in three and two patients, respectively. The pathological diagnoses of the patients were Ewing sarcoma, Chondrosarcoma grade 1, grade 2, periosteal osteosarcoma and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour. The patients had no symptoms at the first visit to our hospital, and no lesions in other organs were detected at the time of the initial examination. At the final follow-up, the patients remained disease-free after radical treatment. The tumour sizes of the five patients were significantly smaller than those of patients with symptoms (P=0.003). The incidental detection of chest wall sarcomas and consequent early detection and treatment of tumours improves patient prognosis relative to that of symptomatically diagnosed patients.

Low local recurrence rate without postmastectomy radiation in node-negative breast cancer patients with tumors 5 cm and larger

9054 Background: Primary sarcomas involving the chest wall are rare and data concerning treatment and results are sparse. Methods: We reviewed our experience with these sarcomas by using a multidisciplinary approach. A 12 year retrospective study identified 17 adult patients referred to our centre with localized primary bony or softy tissue sarcomas of the chest wall. Median age was 42 years (17–67). The male/female ratio was 3.5:1.Presenting complaints were swelling, pain or both. Tumor location were the rib (n=7) and clavicle (n=2) for bony tumors and posterior chest wall for softy tissue tumors (n=8). Histological types included: Ewing sarcomas (n=5), osteosarcomas (n=2), chondrosarcomas (n=4), malignant fibrous histiocytomas (n=2), and other types (n=4). Results: Twelve patients underwent up-front “en bloc” resections. Five patients (pts) underwent initial biopsy followed by resection. Surgical resections were microscopically complete (R0) for 9 pts, microscopically incomplete (R1) for 7 and macroscopically incomplete (R2) for one. Associated therapies were: radiotherapy for 10 pts (6/8 pts with incomplete resection, 4/9 with complete resection) and chemotherapy (pre-operatively for 5 pts, post-operatively for 13). Thirteen pts (76.5%) achieved adequate local tumor control. Seven pts (41.2%) developed local recurrence (LR) but 2 developed both RL + metastases and 3 developed metastases only. The incidence rate of LR was 23% (3/13 pts) in the adequate local control group and 100% in the local treatment failure group. Median follow-up was 38 months (6–168) and revealed 8 deaths. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 56% and 44%. Histology type and the pattern of first relapse were the most significant predictors of OS (p= 0.04; p=0.03). Patients (n=7) with a LR alone (43% alive at 60 months) had a significantly better survival than those with metastases (no patient alive at 36 months). Adequate local control was the major predictor of DFS (p= 0.01). Conclusion: Chest wall sarcomas are rare and require a combined aggressive multidisciplinary approach. The achievement of tumor local control is a critical step in their treatment process. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Patients undergoing surgery for locally advanced lung cancer involving the chest wall require anatomical lung with extensive en-bloc chest wall resection and appropriate reconstruction.In this proof-of-concept study, we aimed to produce personalized three-dimensional (3D)-printed chest wall prosthesis for a patient undergoing chest wall resection and reconstruction using clinically obtained computed tomography (CT) data. Preoperative CT scans of three patients undergoing chest wall resection were analyzed and the areas of resection segmented. This was then used to produce a 3D print of the chest wall and a silicone mold was created from the model. This mold was sterilized and used to produce methyl methacrylate prostheses which were then implanted into the patients. Three patients had their chest wall reconstructed using this technique to produce a patient specific prosthesis. There were no early complications or deaths. It is possible to use 3D printing to produce a patient specific chest wall reconstruction for patients undergoing chest wall resection for malignancy that is cost-effective. This chest wall is thought to provide stability in the form of prosthetic ribs as well compliance in the form of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch. Further research is required to measure chest wall compliance during the respiratory cycle and long-term follow-up from this method.

Chest wall resection is a complicated treatment modality with significant morbidity. The purpose of this study is to report our experience with chest wall resections and reconstructions. The records of all patients undergoing chest wall resection and reconstruction were reviewed. Diagnostic procedures, surgical indications, the location and size of the chest wall defect, performance of lung resection, the type of prosthesis, and postoperative complications were recorded. From 1997 to 2008, 162 patients underwent chest wall resection.113 (70%) of patients were male. Age of patients was 14 to 69 years. The most common indications for surgery were primary chest wall tumors. The most common localized chest wall mass has been seen in the anterior chest wall. Sternal resection was required in 22 patients, Lung resection in 15 patients, Rigid prosthetic reconstruction has been used in 20 patients and nonrigid prolene mesh and Marlex mesh in 40 patients. Mean intensive care unit stay was 8 days. In-hospital mortality was 3.7 % (six patients). Chest wall resection and reconstruction with Bone cement sandwich with mesh can be performed as a safe and effective surgical procedure for major chest wall defects and respiratory failure is lower in prosthetic reconstruction patients than previously reported (6).