Abstract
This paper studies the price of SP in the second step, the risk premium, λ, the spot variance, vt, and the correlation coefficient between the asset return and its volatility, ρ, are estimated by a nonlinear least-squares method that minimizes the sum of the squares of the error between the cross-sectional option price and the corresponding model price. The model performance is assessed by directly comparing the computed option model price with the market price. We find that both the Black–Scholes model and the Heston model overprice the out-of-the-money options and underprice the in-the-money options, but the degree of the bias is different. The Heston model significantly outperforms the Black–Scholes model in almost all moneyness-maturity groups. On average, the Heston model can reduce pricing errors by about 25%. However, pricing bias still exists in the Heston model. In particular, the Heston model always overprices short-term options, indicating that some other factors, such as the random jump, may also be needed to explain the option price.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
