Preserving the peritoneal membrane in long-term peritoneal dialysis patients.

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been widely used by patients with end-stage renal disease. However, chronic exposure of the peritoneal membrane to bioincompatible PD solutions, and peritonitis and uraemia during long-term dialysis result in peritoneal membrane injury and thereby contribute to membrane changes, ultrafiltration (UF) failure, inadequate dialysis and technical failure. Therefore, preserving the peritoneal membrane is important to maintain the efficacy of PD. This article reviews the current literature on therapeutic agents for preserving the peritoneal membrane. A literature search of PubMed was conducted using the search terms peritoneal fibrosis, peritoneal sclerosis, membrane, integrity, preserve, therapy and peritoneal dialysis, but not including peritonitis. Published clinical trials, invitro studies, experimental trials in animal models, meta-analyses and review articles were identified and reviewed for relevance. We focus on understanding how factors cause peritoneal membrane changes, the characteristics and mechanisms of peritoneal membrane changes in patients undergoing PD and the types of therapeutic agents for peritoneal membrane preservation. There have been many investigations into the preservation of the peritoneal membrane, including PD solution improvement, the inhibition of cytokine and growth factor expression using renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade, glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), L-carnitine and taurine additives. In addition, there are potential future therapeutic agents that are still in experimental investigations. The efficacy of many of the therapeutic agents is uncertain because there are insufficient good-quality clinical studies. Overall membrane preservation and patient survival remain unproven in using more biocompatible PD solutions. With RAAS blockade, results are still inconclusive, as many of the clinical studies were retrospective. With GAGs, L-carnitine and taurine additives, there is no sufficiently long follow-up clinical study with a large sample size to support its efficacy. Therefore, better quality clinical studies within this area should be performed.