Abstract

This prepared statement was in connection with my November 30, 2010 testimony before the Subcommittee on Crime and Drugs of the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary in a hearing titled, Examining Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The following topics are covered: Congressional intent in enacting the FCPA; why FCPA has changed; the impact of the new era of FCPA enforcement; the prosecution of individuals; and FCPA and deterrence.Despite being a fundamentally sound statute, the FCPA is being enforced in this new era of FCPA enforcement in many fundamentally unsound ways. The issue is not whether FCPA is good or bad for any one constituency, but whether the DOJ is enforcing, in many instances, the FCPA consistent with its provisions and consistent with Congressional intent. The issue is also whether the DOJ''s rhetoric is consistent with its conduct in prosecuting the most egregious instances of corporate bribery so that FCPA deters and not yield inconsistent results and two tiers of justice. These are the issues that need to be examined and the time to examine these issues is now.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.