Abstract

BackgroundPapillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most commonly diagnosed differentiated thyroid carcinoma. There is controversy about performing upfront lobectomy vs thyroidectomy for smaller well differentiated thyroid carcinoma. MethodsA retrospective study from 2015 to 2020 was conducted consisting of consecutive patients with a preoperative malignant (Bethesda VI) cytology on fine needle aspirate (FNA) consistent with PTC. Specific ultrasonographic features such as taller than wide, hypoechogenicity, irregular margins, internal vascularity and microcalcifications were recorded. Criteria for exclusion was the presence of positive lymph nodes, extrathyroidal extension, familial thyroid carcinoma and bilateral disease detected preoperatively. Outcome was defined as a lobectomy being adequate treatment or a completion thyroidectomy recommended based on current 2015 ATA guidelines. ResultsPreoperative malignant cytological nodules (Bethesda VI) with irregular margins on sonography were significantly (p = 0.025) at increased risk (OR = 2.48) of requiring a completion thyroidectomy. There was also no statistically significant difference between groups when stratified by size with 50% of tumours between 1 and 2 cm requiring a completion thyroidectomy. ConclusionsThe presence of irregular margins on ultrasound predicts an increased risk of requiring a completion thyroidectomy. Specific consideration of this sonographic finding should be made when counselling patients who have cytologically confirmed papillary thyroid carcinoma regarding the best choice of thyroid operation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.